Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Kümes Hayvanlarında Sindirim Sistemi Mikroflorası

Microflora of Digestive Tract in Poultry

Journal Name:

  • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Doğa Bilimleri Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The gut flora are microorganisms that normally live in digestive tract and can do a number of benefit functions for their host health and growth. The unicellular microorganisms are bacteria (predominant), fungi and protozoans. The intestine divided into three parts: the duodenum and small intestine where the number of bacteria relatively low, <108 g-1, the caeca where the microbial fermentation occurs and the number of bacteria present is approximately 1011 g-1 (wet weight) and the large intestine which in most bird is relatively short and is a posterior extension of the small intestine beginning at the level of the caeca and opening into the cloaca. In chicken, bacterial activities are mainly found in crop, caeca and, to lesser extent, the small intestine. The pH and transit time of different section of chicken allow establishment of specific microbial population in chicken. The composition of microorganisms in the gut is not stable over time and not homogeneous among species, individuals, and different parts of the intestine. Development of the gut microflora is dynamic, and is influenced by parents, environment and age. In poultry, the gut microbial community composition changes greatly within the first 2-3 weeks of age before stabilizing until 5-6 weeks of age, when a final change in community composition was observed. In this review, several factors affecting intestinal microflora, members of intestinal bacteria in poultry, roles of Lactobacilli in intestinal microflora were discussed.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bağırsak florasını oluşturan mikroorganizmalar normalde sindirin sisteminde yaşarlar ve konakçılarının sağlığı ile büyümesi üzerinde yararlı etkiler oluştururlar. Burada bulunan tekhücreli mikroorganizmalar dominant durumdaki bakteriler ile birlikte fungus ve protozoalardır. Üç ana kısımdan oluşan bağırsakta; duedonum ve ince bağırsakta bakteri sayısı oldukça azdır <10-8 g. Mikrobiyal fermantasyonun daha çok gerçekleştiği sekumda 1011 g-1 (yaş ağırlık) kadar bakteri bulunurken, çoğu kanatlıda oldukça kısa olan kalın bağırsak ince bağırsağın posterior bir uzantısı olup, sekumla başlayıp kloakla sona ermektedir. Kanatlıların farklı sindirim sisteminin farklı bölümlerindeki pH ve içeriğin geçiş zamanı özgün mikrobiyal popülasyonun oluşmasını sağlamaktadır. Bağırsaktaki mikroorganizmaların kompozisyonu her zaman stabil olmayıp, bununla birlikte farklı bağırsak kısımlarında türler ve bireyler içinde homojen değildir. Bağırsak miroflorasının oluşumu dinamik olup, çevre ve yaş gibi faktörlerce etkilenmektedir. Kanatlılarda mikrobiyal kominite kompozisyonu ilk 2-3 haftalık dönemde fazla miktarda değişmekte ve son değişikliğin görüldüğü 5-6 haftalık dönemde stabil hale gelmektedir. Bu derlemede, bağırsak florasını etkileyen bazı faktörler, kanatlılarda bağırsak bakterisi üyeleri ve Lactobasillerin bağırsak florasındaki rollerine değinilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kumes-hayvanlarinda-sindirim-sistemi-mikroflorasi.pdf
  • 1
39
42
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Adil, S., Magray, S.N., 2012. Impact and manipulation
of gut microflora in poutry: A review. 2012 J.
Anim. Vet. Adv., 11:873-877.
Amit-Romach, E., Sklan, D., Uni, Z., 2004. Microflora
ecology of the chicken intestine using 16S
ribosomal DNA primers. Poult. Sci., 83:1093-
1098.
Barnes, E.M., 1979. The nutritional significance of
dietary fiber analysis. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol,
90:3-20.
Barnes, E.M., Mead, G.C., Barnum, D.A., Harry, G.C.,
1972. The intestinal flora of the chicken in the
period of 2 to 6 weeks of age with particular
reference to the anaerobic bacteria. Br. Poultry
Sci., 13:321-326.
KSÜ Doğa Bil. Derg., 17(1), 2014
KSU J. Nat. Sci., 17(1), 2014
42 Derleme
Review
Bjerrum, L., Engberg, R.M., Leser, T.D., Jensen, B.B.,
Finster, K., Pedersen, K., 2006. Microbial
community composition of the ileum and cecum of
broiler chickens as revealed by molecular and
culture-based techniques. Poult. Sci, 85:1151–
1164.
Coates, M.E., 1980. The gut microflora and Growth. In:
Growth in Animals, Lawrence (ED.), Butterworths,
London, UK, pp: 175-188.
Fuller, R., 1984. Microbial activity in the alimentary
tract of birds. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 43:55-61.
Gabriel, I., Lessire, M., Mallet, S., Guillot J.F. 2006.
Microflora of the digestive tract: critical factors
and consequences for poultry. World Poult. Sci. J.
62:499-511.
Gong, J., Forster, R.J., Yu, H., Chambers, P.M., Sabour,
P.M., Wheatcroft, R., Chen, S., 2002. Molecular
analysis of bacterial populations in the ileum of
broiler chickens and comparison with bacteria in
the caecum. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 41:171-179.
Kizerwetter-Swida, M., Binek, M., 2005. Selection of
potentially probiotic Lactobacillus strains towards
their inhibitory activity against poultry
enteropathogenic bacteria. Pol. J. Microbiol.,
54:287-294.
Levrat, M.A., Remesy, C., Sorensen, P., 1991. High
propionic acid fermentation and mineral
accumulation in the caecum of rats adapted to
different levels of inulin. J. Nutr., 121:1730-1737.
Lin, W.H., Yu, B., Jang, S.H., Tsen, H.Y., 2007.
Different probiotic properties for Lactobacillus
fermentum strains isolated from swine and poultry.
Anaerobe, 13:107-113.
Lorenzoni, G. 2011. Intestinal flora and nutrition demand
a true balance. World Poult., 3: 1.
Mead, G.C., 1989. Microbes of the avian cecum: Types
present and substrates utilized. J. Exp. Zool., 3:48-
54.
Mulder, R.W.A.W., Havenaar, R., Huis, J.H.J., 1997.
Intervention stragies the use of probiotics and
competitive exclusion microfloras against
contamination with pathogens in poutry and pigs.
In: Probiotics 2 Application and Practical Aspects,
Fuller R. (Ed.). Chapman and Hall, New York, pp:
187-207.
Neal-McKinney, J.M., Lu, X., Duong, T., Larson, C.L.,
Call, D.R., Shah, D.H., Konke, M.E., 2012.
Production of organic acids by probiotic
Lactobacilli can be used to reduce pathogen load in
poultry. PLOS ONE, 7:1-11.
Nurmi, E.V., Rantala, M., 1973. New aspects of
Salmonella infection in broiler production. Nature,
241:210-211.
Pedroso, A.A., Menten, J.F., Lambais, M.R., Racanicci,
A.M., Longo, F.A., Sorbara, J.O., 2006. Intestinal
bacterial community and growth performance of
chickens fed diets containing antibiotics. Poult.
Sci., 85:747-752.
Pissavin, C., Burel, C., Gabriel, I., Beven, V., Mallet, S.,
Maurice, R., Queguiner, M., Lessire, M., Fravalo,
P., 2012. Capillary electrophoresis single-strand
conformation polymorphism for the monitoring of
gastrointestinal microbiota of chicken flocks. Poult.
Sci., 91 :2294-2304
Salanitro, J.P., Lake, I.G.B., Muirhead, P.A., Maglio,
M., Goodman, R., 1978. Bacteria isolated from the
duodenum, ileum, and cecum of young chicks.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 35:782-790.
Salminen, S., Bouley, C., Boutron-Ruault, M.C.,
Cummings, J.H., Frank, A., 1998. Functional food
science and gastrointestinal physiology function.
Br. J. Nut., 80:147-171.
Samanta, A.K., Jayapal, N., Senani, S., Kolte, A.P.,
Sridhar, M., 2013. Prebiotic inulin: Useful dietary
adjuncts to manipulate the livestock gut microflora.
Brazilian Journal of Microbiology, 44:1-14.
Smith, H.W., 1965. Observations on the flora of the
alimentary tract of animals and factors affecting its
composition. J. Pathol. Bacteriol., 89:95-122.
Timms, I., 1968. Observations on the bacterial flora of
the alimentary tract in three age groups of normal
chickens. Br. Vet. J., 24:470-477.
Torok, V.A., Ophel-Keller, K., Hughes, R.J., Forder, R.,
Ali, M., Macalpine, R., 2007. Environment and
age: impact on poultry gut microflora. Proceedings
ofthe 19th Australian Poultry Science Symposium,
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 12-14
February. pp 149-152.
Van der Wielen, P.W., Biesterveld, S., Notermans, S.,
Hofstra, H., Urlings, B.A.P., Van knapen, F., 2001.
Inhibition of glucose limited sequencing fed batch
culture of Salmonella enteric Setrovar Enteritidis
by volatile fatty representative of the ceca of
broiler chickens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,
67:1979-1982.
Zhou, H., Gong, J., Brisbin, J.T., Yu, H., Sanei, B.,
Sabour, P., Sharif, S., 2007. Appropriate chicken
sample size for identifying the composition of
broiler intestinal microbiota affected by dietary
antibiotics, using the polymerase chain reactiondenaturing
gradient gel electrophoresis technique.
Poult Sci., 86:2541-2549.
Zhu, X.Y., Zhong, T., Pandya, Y., Joerger, R.D., 2002.
16S rRNA-based analysis of microbiota from the
cecum of broiler chickens. Appl. Environ.
Microbiol., 68:124-137.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com