Buradasınız

An observational study of causes of recurrent pregnancy loss in rural Population

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction: Our aim was to identify causes of recurrent pregnancy loss in rural population in Maharashtra in Indian population Method: A longitudinal observation study was carried out in the Obst and Gynae department , Pravara Hospital . The study enrolled 70 patients aged 18 to 44 years with history of at least two or more miscarriages less than 20 weeks gestation. They were divided into 3 groups -Group A patients with history of two or more pregnancy losses who reported to OPD immediately after abortion of their last pregnancy; Group B - patients with history of recurrent pregnancy loss but < 20 weeks of gestation in their present pregnancy at the time of inclusion in study; Group C - patients with history of recurrent pregnancy loss but more than 20weeks gestation in their present pregnancy at the time of inclusion in the study. A detailed clinical history , thorough clinical examination and investigated with a certain group of pre-decided laboratory tests and special tests wherever relevant and possible, were done. The causes of RPL were evaluated. Results: Underlying causes were diagnosed in 35% cases ,while 65% cases remained unexplained. Anatomical causes were detected in 20% cases , wherein incompetent cervix was the most common cause while uterine malformations were present in 23.5% cases among which septate uterus was most common . 6% had Endocrine etiology ,comprising of hypothyroidism and diabetes mellitus . Infective cause in 6% and autoimmune causes in 3% patients. Conclusion: From our study we conclude that , even after detailed evaluation majority of cases of RPL remain unexplained . Anatomical causes account for majority causes in RPL .
70
76

REFERENCES

References: 

1) Berek Jonathan S. Berek & Novak’s Gynecology,14th edn,Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,1278.
2) RCOG Guidelines The Investigation and Treatment of Couples with Recurrent first trimester and second
trimester Miscarriage.RCOG Green-top Guideline No. 17 , 2011
3) Sirrat GM. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet 1999;336:673-5
4) Jivraj S, Anstie B, Cheong YC et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcome in women with a history of recurrent
miscarriage.Hum Reprod 2001;16:102-6.
5) T.C.Li, Makris M,Tomsu M et al . Recurrent miscarriage: aetiology, management and prognosis.2002
Human Reproduction Update, Vol.8, No.5 pp. 463±481.
6) Drakeley AJ, QuenbyS and FarquharsonRG. Mid-trimester loss—appraisal of a screening protocol. Hum
Reprod 1998;13(7) 1975–1980.
Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; December 2014: Vol.-4, Issue- 1, P. 70-76
71
www.ijbamr.com P ISSN: 2250-284X , E ISSN : 2250-2858
7) BrighamSA, Conlon C,FarquharsonRG. A longitudinal study of pregnancy outcome following idiopathic
recurrent miscarriage . Hum Reprod 1999;14-11:.2868-2871
8) Bhattacharya S, Townend J, Shetty A et al. Does miscarriage in an initial pregnancy lead
to adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in the next continuing pregnancy?BJOG 2008; 115(13):1623-
29.
9) Saito Shigeru.The causes and treatment of recurrent pregnancy loss . JMAJ 2009.52(2): 97–102.
10) Grimbizis GF, Camus M,Tarlatzis BC,et al. Clinical implications of uterine malformations and
hysteroscopic treatment results.Hum Reprod Update.2001;7:161-174.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com