You are here

DESIGNING E-LEARNING PROGRAMS FOR RURAL SOCIAL TRANSFORMATION AND POVERTY REDUCTION

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
While the conventional education system with different forms of E-learning and rigid academic instructive curriculum could not bring desired changes in specified timeframe work at rural level in the targeted communities and groups, a multipronged sociological approach with a sociable and flexible curriculum in new E-Learning programs becomes need of hour. The impact of socializing influence of these E-Learning programs should be properly exploited to motivate and inspire the rural target groups. The benefits of Elearning then become extensive and soon integrate with the needs of the lower strata of the society in order for achieving a rapid social transformation in the lives of the farmers, vocational groups, artisans and small income self help groups comprising women, girls and physically challenged. The paper suggests a number of new generation E-Learning programs as strategies of development communication with a promise of high returns for the industry for its investment in these programs with socially relevant messages and media convergence.
169-179

REFERENCES

References: 

Azim Premji Foundation (2006). http://www.azimpremjifoundation.org
Badrul H. K and Vinod. J. (2006). E-Learning—Who, What and How? Journal of Creative
Communications. 1:1 (Sage Publications).
Census (2006). (http://www.censusindia.net/literates1.html
Daniel J G, (2006). How to reduce India‘s rural distress Deccan Chronicle in
―Meanwhile‖ Column Oct 31. (Karimnagar Edition).
Delors Commission Report, (1996).
Friere P (1983). Pedagogy of the oppressed, Seaburg Press, New York.
Infosys Foundation. http://www.infosys.com/infosys_foundation/index.htm
IWS (2006). http://www.internetworldstats.com/top20.htm
Jayanti, C. (2006). Mid term report card: Average, Oct 7, Indian Express.
Mefalopulos P, (2005). ―Communication for Sustainable Development: Applications and
Challenges‖ in Hemer O and Tufter, T (Eds). Media, Communication and Social Change:
Rethinking Communication for Development. Buenos Aires: CLASCO and Nordicom.
NICNET (2006). www.education.nic.in/cd50years/g/52/4J/524J0601.htm
Ortner, G. E. (1992). Does two way communication require a new distance education
technology? in: G. E. Ortner, K.Graff & H.Wilmersdoefer (Eds) Distance Education as
two-way communication. Frankfurt am Main, Verlag Per Lang, 148-170.
Paul M.C. (2005). Higher Education in India and the Need of Quality Assurance
Mechanisms for Developing a Knowledge Scoeity, University News, Association of
Indian Universities.Vol 43 (21) May 23-29. 2.
Pradeep, K. M. (2006). E-Strategies to support rural education in India. Educational
Media International (Routledege). Vol. 43 No. 2. 165-179.
Pragya S. (2006). Ring Tone‘s reality check: India Cell Phone story long way to go. Sept
19, Indian Express.
Rogers E. M. (1976). Communication and Development: Critical Perspectives. Beverly
Hills. Sage.
Rogers E. M. (1962). Diffusion of Innovations. New York Free Press.
Som Naidu. (2006). A Guidebook of Principles, Procedures and Practices E-Learning.
CEMCA, 11.
The World Congress on Communication for Development (2006). Communication for
Development—Making a Difference, (Oct 25-27). Rome, Italy.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com