You are here

Home » Content

SONÎK VE ULTRASONİK SİSTEMLERİN DİŞHEKİMLİĞİNDE KULLANIMI

THE USE OF SONIC AND ULTRASONIC SYSTEMS IN DENTISTRY

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2002

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Sonic an d ultrasonic systems are being used in medical .science for diagnosis and treatment. These systems were used firstly in 1957 in dentistry with root canal treatment. Then, both in root canal treatment (root canal preparation, filling the roots, removing the silver cones, posts and broken instruments, retro cavity preparations) and in periodontal treatment (detertraj, curettage, removing the stains) sonic and ultrasonic systems were used lor different purposes. Recently a new instrument which works with sonic^, mechanism was developed for usage in cavity preparation. There isn't enough information about the effectiveness of this instrument. The aim of lliis review is to give information about the sonic systems and their usage in dentistry.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Sonik v e ültrasonik sistemler tıpta teşhis ve tedavi amacı ile yaygın olarak kullanılmakladır. Dişhekimliğindc bu sistemlerin kullanımı, ilk olarak 1957 yılında kök kanal prcparusyoını ile başlamıştır. Daha sonra, kök kanal tedavisinde değişik, amaçlarla (kanal preperasyonununda, kanalların doldurulmasında, gümüş kon, post ve kırık aletlerin çıkartılmasında, kök ucunda kavile prcpcrasyonutıda) kullanılmalarının yanışını, periodontal tedavi (detertraj, kürelaj vc lekelerin uzaklaştırılması işlemlerinde) amacıyla da sonik ve ültrasonik sistemlerin kullanıldığı gözlenmiştir. Son yıllarda ise, kavite preparas yon undu kullanılmak üzere sonik mekanizmayla çalışan yeni bir alet sistemi geliştirilmiştir. Bu aletlerin etkinliği hakkında literatürde yeterli bilgi mevcut değildir. Bu derlemenin amacı, sonik sistemlerin dişhckımligindckı kullanım alanları ve etkinlikleri hakkında bilgi sumılmasıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sonik-ultrasonik-sistemlerin-dishekimliginde-kullanimi.pdf
  • 3
58-65
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Alaça
m T. Endodonti. 2. Baskı, Ankara, 2000; 216-2192. Altshull .111, Marshall G. Morgan LA. Raumgartner JC. Comparision of Dentinal Crack Incidence and Removal Time Resulting from Post Removal by Ultrasonic or Mechanical Force. J Hndodon 1997; 23; 683-686
3. Atalay R.
Eğr
i Kanallarda Farklı Preperasyoıı Tekniklerinin Değerlendirilmesi ile İlgili Bir Arattırma. Doktora Tc/Çalışması. 1994
4. Baker MC, Ashrafı SH, Van Cura, Remeikis JH. Ultrasonic Compared with Hand Instrumentation; A Scanning Electron Microscope Study. J Endodon 1988; 14: 435-440
5. Beling KL, Marshall JG, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC. Evaluation lor Cracks Associated with Ultrasonic Root-End Preperation of Gutta-Percha Filled Canals. J Endodon 1997; 23; 323-326
6. Bertolotti R, Laomanen H. Bite-formed Posterior Resin Composite Restorations, Placed with a Self-Etching lYimer and a Novel Matrix. Quint In! 1999; 30; 419-22
7. Brent PD. Morgan LA, Marshall JG, Baumgartner JC, Evaluation of Diamond Coated Ultrasonic Instruments for Root-End Prcpcration. J Hndodon 1999; 25: 672-676
8. Buancristani J, Bradley (j, Caputo A. ^valuation ot Ultrasonic and Sonic Instruments lor '[ n trad i c ular Post Removal. J Hndodon 1994:20:486-489
9. Cameron CA. I he Use of Ultrasound in The Cleaning of Root Canals: A Clinical Report. .1 Hndodon
1982;8:472-474
10. Che nail BL, Teplitsky PE. Rndosonie.s Curbed Rool Canals. J Endodon 1985; 1 I: 369-374
11. Christensen G. Amalgam vs. Composite Resin: J A DA 1998; 129: 1757-59
12. iXimmer PM, Alodch MH. Döller R. Shaping of SimuMed Root Canals in Resin Blocks Using Files Activated by a Sonic Handpiece. Int Hndodon 1989; 22: 211-5
13- Ehriich E, Bayer YS, Hicks MC, Pellcv GB. Effects of Sonic Instrumentation on the Apical Prcpcration of Curved Canals. I Endodon 1989; İS: 200-?
]4. Glickman I . Clinical Penodontology, 7. baskı, USA. 1990; 603-607
15- Hasse L. An Innovative Approoich to ("lass II Prcpcration and Restoration. Signature, Spring Edition 1998; 16-8
16. Hugo B. Slassinakis A. Preperation and Restoration of Small Inlerpraksimal Carious Lesions with Sonic Instruments PracL Periodonl Aeslhel Dent 1998: 10: 353-359
17. Hull B, John V. Non-DcsLruclive testing. 1. Baskı, I Ion- Kong. 1988: 57-63
18. Jordan R, Suzuki M. Posterior Composite Restorations. JADA 1991; 122:31-37
19. Kielt LW, Montgomery S. The Hfleet of Endosonic Instrumentation in Simulated Curved Root Canals J Endodon 1987: 13:215-9
20. Koczorski J, Mitehull AI,. Direct Inlcy Restorations; Utilization of Sonic Preperation Technology in Conjunction with Ceramic Inserts. Praet Pcriodont Aesthet Dent 1999; IH67-73
21. Langeland K, Ciao K, Pascon HA. Work-Savirig Devices in Endodontics: Efficacy of Sonic and Ultrasonic Techniques. J Endodon 1985; 11:499-51022
Leinfelde
r KK A Conscvativc Approch la placing Posterim Composite Resin Restorations. JADA 1996, 127: 743-48
23. Eicnbcrg H. Sonic Approx: An Innovative Addition to the Restorative Continuum, I "rati PcriodoM Acsthct Dent 1998; 10: 913-922
24. Loushine R.I, Wdler HN, Hartwcl GR. Stcrcomicroscopic Evaluation of tana! Shape Following Hand, Sonic, and Ultrasonic Instrumentation. J Endodon 1989; 15: 417-21
25. Luiten D.I, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC, Marshall JG, A Comparision of Instrumentation Techniques on Apical Canal Transportation. .1 hndodon 1995; 21: 26-32
26. Mara JBC. Carda so PE, Ball ester RY. Microleakage of Class II Restoration Using Patterned Porcelain Inserts, J Dent Res 2000; 79: 369
27. Martın H. Ultrasonic Disinfection ol' the Root Canal. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1 976; 42: 92-97
28. Mehloff L>S, Marshall JG, Baumgartner ,1C. Comparision of Ultrasonic and High-speed Bur Root-end Preperations Using Bilaterally Matched Teath. J hndodon 3997; 23: 448-452
29. Rainwater A, Jcansonne BG. Sarkar N. Effects of Ultrasonic Root-End Preperation on Mictocrack Formation and Lcakege. J Endodon 20(10; 26: 72-75
30. Richman MT. The Use of Ultrasonics in Root Canal Therapy arid Root Resection. J Dent Med 1957; 12: 12-18
31. Scticn VJ, Denehy C1K. Vargas MA. Cavity IVeperation Devices: Effect on Microleakage of Class If Composite. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 3 139
32. Sonicsys
Kullanı
m Kılavuzu, Kavo, 2000
33. Tang MP, Stock CJ. I he Effect ol" Hand. Sonic and Ultrasonic Instrumentation on (hi- Shape of Curved Root Canals. Int Endodon J 1989; 22: 55-63
34. Transtad F, Harriett h. Scht-iartibcn L, Frasea P. Effectiveness and Safely of a Sonic Vibratory Endodontic Instrument, hndodon Dent Travmaut 1985; 1: 69-76
35. Hrltti I, Bala Q, Sonicsys Appro*
Kullanımını
n Klas 11 Restorasyonların Mikrosızmîısı Üzerine Etkisi. Cîa/.i Üniversitesi Di^hckinıligi Fakültesi 2. Uluslararası Bilimsel Kongresi 20ü I; poster no;34
36. Walker TL. Del Rio O. Histological Evaluation of Ultrasonic and Sonic Instrumentation of Curved Root Canals. J Endodon 1989, 15: 49 59
37. Weller RN, Brody JM, Bemier WE. Efficacy of Ultrasonic Cleaning. J Endodon 1985; II: 369-374
38. Wilson NHP, Dunne SM, Uainsfbrt ID. Current Materials and Techniques for Direct Restorations in Posterior "fecth. Part 2: Resin Coraposit Systems. Int Dent J 1997:47: 185-93
39. Wilson NHF, Wilson M, Smith GA. A Clinical Trial of a Visible Light Cured Posterior Composite Resin Restorative Material: Four-Year Results. Quint. Int 1998; 19: 133-39
40. Yahya AS, El Dceb ME. Effect ol" Sonic Versus Ultrasonic Instrumentation on Canal Preperaiion. .1 Endodon 1989; 15:235-9

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com