You are here

Home » Content

PERIODONTAL TEDAVİDE ULTRASONIK VE SONİK KAZIYICILAR

ULTRASONIC AND SONIC SCALERS IN PERIODONTAL TREATMENT

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1993

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this review the significance of sonic and ultrasonic scalers in the initial phase of periodontal therapy were evaluated. Although, during the initial phase of periodontal therapy, ultrasonic scalers seem to be as efficient as hand instruments, since they are not cabaple of working in deep and fibrotic periodontal pockets. Furthermore, patients with cardiac pacemakers or systemic infections are not good candidates for ultrasonic therapy. Sonic scalers do have some advantages over ultrasonic scalers. They are cost efficient, easy to sterilize and smaller in shape. But it would be an overestimation to claim that sonic scalers could replace ultrasonic scalers. There are not enough investigations on the efficiancy of sonic scalers.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu derlemede ultrasonik ve sonik kazıyıcıların periodontal başlangıç tedavisindeki yerleri değerlendirilmiştir. Ultrasonik kazıyıcılar periodontal başlangıç tedavisinde, klinik olarak, el aletleri üe aynı sonucu vermektedir. Ancak ultrasonik kazıyıcılar, el aletlerinin yerin tam olarak dolduramazlar. Zira, derin ve fibrotik ceplerde tüm kök yüzeylerine istenilen düzeyde ulaşamazlar. Ayrıca, infeksi-yon geçiren hastalarda ve kalp pili taşıyan bireylerde kullanılmaları sakıncalıdır. Sonik kazıyıcıların İse ultrasonik kazıyıcılara oranla daha küçük, ucuz ve kolay sterilize edilebilir olmaları gibi önemli avantajları vardır. Ancak, sonik kazıyıcıların ultrasonik kazıyıcıların yerini alabileceklerini ifade etmek şu an için mümkün değildir. Çünkü, üzerlerinde henüz yeteri kadar araştırma yapılmamıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-periodontal-tedavide-ultrasonik-sonik-kaziyicilar.pdf
  • 3
244
249
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Allen, E.F. and Rhoads, R.H.: Effects of high speed periodontal instruments on tooth surface. /. Periodontal., 1963; 34: 352-56.
2. Badersten, A., Nilveus, R. and Egelberg, J.: Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. I. Moderately advanced periodontitis./. Clin. Periodontal, 1981; 8: 57-72.
3. Badersten, A., Nilveus, R. and Egelberg, J.: Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. II. Severely advanced periodontitis. /. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1984; 11: 63-76.
4. Baehni, P., Thiio, B„ Chapuis, B. and Pernet, D.: Effects of ultrasonic and sonic scalers on dental plaque microflora in vitro and in vivo. /. CUn. PeriodontoL, 1992; 19: 455-59.
5. Belting, CM. and Spjut, P.J.: Effects of high-speed periodontal instruments on the root surface during subgingival calculus removal. J.Am. Dent. Assoc., 1964; 69: 579-84.
6. Breİninger, D.R., O'Leary, T.J. and Blumenshine, R.V.H.: Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus. J. PeriodontoL, 1987;58: 9-18.
7. Clark, S.M.: The ultrasonic dental unit: A guide for the clinical application of ultrasonics in dentistry and in dental hygiene. /. PeriodontoL, 1969; 40: 621-29.
8. Clark, S.M., Grupe, H.E. and Mahler, D.B.: The effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on root surfaces., 1968; 39: 135-137.
9. Curie, J. and Curie, P.: Sur I'electricite polaire dans les cris-taux hemiedresa faces enclinees., Compt. Read. Acad. Sc., 1880; 91: 383 (7'den naklen).
10. Dentsply International Inc.: Instructions for using Dentsply / Cavitron Model 2001,1980.
11. D'Silva, I.V., Nayak, R.P., Cherian, K.M. and Mulky, M.J.: An evaluation of the root topography following periodontal instrumentation-A scaning electran microscopic study./. Periodontal., 1979; 50: 283-90.
12. Ewen, S.J.: Ultrasound and periodontics. /. PeriodontoL, 1960; 31: 101-6.
13. Ewen, S.J. and Tascher, P.J.: Clinical use of ultrasonic root scaler./. PeriodontoL, 1958; 29: 45-49.
14. Gankerseer, eJ. and Walmsley, A.D.: Preliminary investigation into the performance of a sonic scaler. /. PeriodontoL, 1987; 58: 780-84.
15. Gellin, R.G., Miller, M.C., Javed, T., Engler, W.O. and Mishkin, D.J.: The effectiveness of the Titan-S sonic scaler versus curettes in the removal of subgingival calculus. A human surgical evaluation./. PeriodontoL, 1986; 57: 672-80.
16. Goldman, H.M.: Curettage by ultrasonic instrument. Oral Surg., OralMed., OralPathoL, 1960; J3:43-53.
17. Goldman, H.M.: Histologic assay of healing following ultrasonic curettage versus hand instrument curettage. Oral Surg., OralMed., OralPathoL, 1961; 14: 925-28.
18. Jotikasthira, N.E., Lie, T. and Leknes, K.N.: Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1992; 19: 560-69.
19. Joule, J.P.: On the effects of magnetism upon the dimensions of iron and steel bars. Mag. and J. Science Series, 1847; 3: 30: 76 (7'den naklen).
20. Kerry, G.J.: Roughness of root surfaces after use of ultrasonic instruments and hand curettes./. PeriodontoL, 1967; 38: 340-46.
21. Khatiblou, F.A. and Ghodssi, A.: Root surface smoothness or roughness in periodontal treatment. A clinical study./. PeriodontoL, 1983; 54: 365-67.
22. Larato, D.C., Ruskin, P.F. and Martin, A.: Effect of an ultrasonic scaler on bacterial counts in air. /. PeriodontoL 1967; 38: 550-54.
23. Leon, L.E. and Vogel, R.I.: A comparison of the effectiveness of hand scaling and ultrasonic debridement İn furcations as evaluated by differential dark-field microscopy./. PeriodontoL 1987;55:86-94.
24. Lie, T. and Leknes, K.N.: Evaluation of the effect on root surfaces of air turbine scalers and ultrasonic instrumentation./. PeriodontoL, 1985; 56: 522-31.
25. Lie, T. and Meyer, K.: Calculus removal and loss of tooth substance in response to different periodontal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1977; 4: 250-62.
26. Loos, B., Kİger, R. and Egelberg, J.: An evaluation of basic periodontal therapy using sonic and ultrasonic scalers./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1987; 14: 29-33.
27. Meyer, K. and Lie, T.: Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of micro-roughness measurements and scaning electron microscopy. /. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1977; 4: 77-91.
28. Moskow, B.S.: The response of the gingival sulcus to instrumentation: a histological investigation./. PeriodontoL, 1962; 33: 282-91.
29. Möller, P., Grevstad, A.O. and Kristoffersen, T.: Ultrasonic scaling of maxillary teeth causing tinnitus and temporary hearing shifts./ Clin. PeriodontoL, 1976; 3: 123-27.
Periodontal
Tedavide Ultrasonik ve Sonik Kazıyıcdar
249
30. Nadler, H.: Removal of crevicular epithelium by ultrasonic curettes. J. Periodontal, 1962; 33: 220-25.
3Î
. Oosterwaal, P.J.M., Matee, M.I., Mikx, F.H.M., van't Hof, M.A. and Renggli, H.H.: The effect of subgingival debridement with hand and ultrasonic instruments on the subgingival microflora./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1987; 14: 528-33.
32. Pameijer, C.H., Stallard, R.E. and Hiep, N.: Surface characteristics of teeth following periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study./. PeriodontoL, 1972; 43: 628-33.
33. Patterson, M., Eick, J.D., Eberhard, A.B., Gross, K. and Killoy, W.J.: The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations. /. PeriodontoL, 1989; 60: 325-29.
34. Ritz, L., Hefti, A.F. and Rateitschak, K.H.: An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1991; 18: 643-47.
35. Rosenberg, R.M. and Ash, M.M.: The effect of root roughness on plaque accumulation and gingival inflamation./. PeriodontoL 1974; 45:146-50.
36. Sanderson, A.D.: Gingival curettage by hand and ultrasonic instruments: Ahistologic comparison./.PeriodontoL, 1966; 40:279-90.
37. Schaffer, E.M., Stende, G. and King, D.: Healing of periodontal pocket tissues following ultrasonic scaling and hand planing./. PeriodontoL, 1964; 35: 140-48.
38. Smart, GJ., Wilson, M., Davies, E.H. and kieser, J.B.: The assesment of ultrasonic root surface debridement by determination of residual endotoxin levels. /. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1990; 17: 174-78.
39. Stende, G.W. and Schaffer, E.M.: A comparison of ultrasonic and hand scaling./. PeriodontoL, 1961; 32: 312-14.
40. Stewart, J.L., Drisko, R.R. and Herİach, A.D.: Comparison of ultrasonic and hand instruments for the removal of calculus. J.Am. Dent., Assoc., 1967; 75: 153-57.
41. Suppipat, N.: Ultrasonics in periodontics./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1974; J: 206-13.
42. Sweeney, W.T.: Charactiristics of ultrasonic vibrations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 1957;55:819-22.
43. Thornton, S. and Garnick, J.: Comparison of ultrasonic to hand instruments in the removal of subgingival plaque./. PeriodontoL, 1982; 53: 35-7.
44. Torfason, T.f Kiger, R., Selvig, K.A. and Egelberg, J.: Clinical improvement of gingival conditions following ultrasonic versus hand instruments of periodontal pockets./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1979; 6: 165-76.
45. Walmsley, A.D., Laird, W.R.E. and Williams, A.R.: Dental plaque removal by cavitational activity during ultrasonic scaling./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1988; 15: 539-43.
46. Walmsley, A.D., Walsh, T.F., Laird, W.R.E. and Williams, A.R.: Effects of cavitational activity on the root surface of during ultrasonic scaling./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1990; 17: 306¬12.
47. Wilkinson, R.F. and Maybury, J.E.: Scanning electron mikroscopy of the root surface following instrumentation. /. PeriodontoL, 1973; 44: 559-63.
48. Youle, J.D.:
Teme
l bilimler ansiklopedisi. Milliyet Yayınlan, İstanbul, 1989.
49. Zinner, D.D.: Ultrasonic studies in dentistry: A preliminary report. Proc. of Fourth Annual Conference on Ultrasonic Therapy. Library of Congress 55:12257:6:1955 (39'dan naklen).

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com