You are here

Home » Content

SEROMERLER VE FİBERLE GÜÇLENDİRİLMİŞ KOMPOZİTLER

CEROMERS AND FİBER-REİNFORCED COMPOSİTES

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2006

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Recent studies in resin chemistry have provided the production of new dental composites with advanced physical and mechanic properties. Fiber materials are very functional materials and fber-rennforced compostt (FRC) resin systems contain all advantages of ceramic and poiimer chemistry. Renn forced composites can be considered two main groups according to reinforcement materials. If the reinforcement materia/ is a fiber, it is called FRC. If the reinforcement material is ceramic particules, it is called ceromer. Although FRC are composed of fibers with various structure and shape (glass, carbon, polyethylene, aramid) added into resin matrix; ceromers are hibrit resin composites reinforced with ceramic particules which are called glass poiimers. FRC prosthesis can be prepared either by a dental technician in a dental aaboratuary or by the dentist by charrside. This paper is about the structure and the propertis of FRC prosthesis which are a better alternative for non metallic prosthesis and the advantages, disadvantages, indications, contrindica-tions and the application areas are explained.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Reznn kimyasındaki son gelişmeler, fiziksel ve mekanik özellikleri geiiştirilmiş yeni dental kompozitlerin üretimini sağlamıştır. Fiber materyallerinin kullanım alanları geniştir ve fiber ile güçlendirilen kompozit (FRC) reznn sistemleri, seramik ve poiimer kimyasının avantajlarını bir araya getirmektedir. Güçlendirilmiş kompozitler içeriğindeki materyale göre iki ana gruba aynlmaktadrr. Eğer güçlendirme materyali fiber ise FRC, seramik parçacıkları ise seromer ismini almaktadırlar. FRCler resin matriks içerisine ilave edilen değişik yapı ve şekildeki fiberlerden (Cam, karbon, poiietilen, aram id gibi) meydana gelirken, seromerler cam polimerler diye adlandırılan, seramik parçacıklarıyla güçlendirilmiş hbrtt resin kompoztt/erdir. FRC protezler, diş teknisyeni tarafından laboratuarda veya diş hekimi tarafından hasta başında hazırlanabilmektedir. Makalede, metal desteksiz restorasyon/ara iyi bir alternatif o/an FRC protezlerin yapıları ve özellikleri hakkında bilgi verilmiş, avantaj, dezavantaj, endkkasyon, kontrendkkasyon ve uygulama alan/arı anlatılmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-seromerler-fiberle-guclendirilmis-kompozitler.pdf
  • 2
52-60
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Aydın
C, Yimaz H, Korkmaz T, At/ı Y, Zan T. Değşşkk kron-köprü veneer materyallerin/n sertliklerin/n ince/enmesi. Cum ÜÜ Dşşhek Fak Der 1998; 1(2): 93-96.
2. Dyer SC, Lass/la L V J, Joknnen M, Vaitttu P K. Effect of fiber position and orientation on fracture load of fber-rennforced composite. Dental Mater 2004;20:947-955.
3. Freiiich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Goldberg AJ. Fiber-reinforced composites in clinical dentistry 2000; Quintessence Pub. Co. Inc, Illinois.
4. Vaitttu PK, Seveinns C. Resin-bonded, fiber-reinforced composite fixed partial dentures: A cfinical study. J. Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 413¬418.
5. Cho L, Song H, Koak J, Heo S. Marginal accuracy and fracture strength of ceromer/ fber-rennforced composite crowns: Effect of variations in preparation design. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 388-395.
6. Ellakwa AE, Shortal AC, Marquis PM. Influence of fiber type and wettnng agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced compostt. JProsthet Dent2002, 88:485-490.
7. Freiiich MA, Meiers JC. Fber-rennforced composite prostheses. Dent Cin N Am 2004; 48: 545-562.
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt: 16, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2006, Sayfa: 52-60
8. Pfefffer, P., Grube, L., In Vitro Resistance of Interim Fixed Partiai Dentures, J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89:170-174.
9. Yimaz H, Aydın C: Akriiik resin/erin güçlendirme teknikeeri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2002; 12(1): 46-53.
10. Frettas CRB, Miranda MIS, Andrade MF, Flores VHO, Vaz LG, Guimaraes NC. Resistance to maxillary premo/ar fractures after restoration of class 2 preparations with resin composite or ceromer. Qunnttessence In12002; 33:589-594.
11. Jain P, Cobb D. Evaluation of fber-rennforced, bonded, inley- supported fixed partial enture-4-year resutts. Compendium 2002; 23(9): 779-792.
12. Ku CW, Park SW, Yang HS. Comparison of the fracture strengths of metal-ceramic crowns and three ceromer crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88:170-175.
13. Wak T, Nakamura T, Wakabayashi K, Mutobe Y, Yatani H. Adesvee strength between fber-rennforced composites and veneering composites and fracture load of combinations of these materials. Int J Prosthodont2004; 17:364-368.
14. Behr M, Rosentrttt M, Lazel D, Kreiseer T. Comparison of three types of fber-rennforced composite molar crowns on their fracture resistance and margnnal adaptation. J Dent 2001; 29:187-196.
15. Boh/sen F, Kern M. Clinical outcome of glass-fiber-reinforced crowns and fixed partaal dentures: A three-year retrospective study. Qunnttessence Int 2003; 34: 493-496.
16. Kükrer D, Gemalmaz D, Kuybulu EO, Bozkurt FÖ. A retrospective cinnical study of ceromer inlays: Results up to 53 months. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:17-23.
17. Edehoff D, Spiekermann H, Yi/dirim M. Metal-free inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Quintessence Int 2001; 32:269-281.
18. Attieri JV, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ, Pate/ AP. Longitudinal cinnical evaluation of fber-rennforced composite fixed partial dentures: A pilot study. J. Prosthet Dent 1994; 71:16- 22.
19. Rosentrttt M, Behr M, Lebrock A, Handel G, Friedel KH. Intraoral reparr of fber-rennforced composite fixed partial dentures. J. Prosthet Dent 1998; 79:393- 398.
KURT,
ÖZDOĞAN
, YILMAZ
20. Duke ES. The introduction of a new class of composite resins: Ceromers. Compendium 1999; 20(3): 246-247.
21. Replacement of an anterior tooth with a fber-rennforced resin bridge. Compendium 2001; 22(1): 68-74.
22. Park S-H. Comparison of degree of conversion for tight-cured and aditionally heat-cured composttes. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 613-618.
23. Samadzadeh A, Kugel G, Hurley E, Aboushala A. Fracture strengths of provisional restorations enforced with plasma-treated wowen polyethylene fiber. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78(5):447-450.
24. Kern M, Strub JR, Lü XY. Wear of composite resin veneering materials in a newly developed chewing simulator. J Dent Res 1998; 77:901-906.
25. Tanue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Wear and surface rougness of prosthetic composttes after toothbrush- dentifrice abrasion. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 350-355.
26. Göhring TN, Mörmann WH, Lutz F. Cinnical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of fber-rennforced inlay fixed dentures: Preliminary resuls after one year. J. Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 662¬668.
27. Behr M, Rosentrttt M, Ledwinsky E, Handel G. Fracture resistance and margnnal adaptation of conventionally cemented fber-rennforced composite three unit FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 467-472.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com