You are here

Home » Content

KENDİNDEN PÜRÜZLENDİREN İKİ BAĞLAYICININ UYGULAMA FARKLILIKLARININ MİKROSIZINTI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

THE EVALUATION OF EFFECT ON MICROLEAKAGE OF APPLICATION DIFFERENCES OF TWO SELF-ETCHING ADHESIVE

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2007

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on microleakage of application differences [ename--etch (ME) and total-etch (TE)] of two self-etching adhesive with different acidic characteristic [Cearfl SE Bond (SE) and Prompt L-Pop (PLP)] and was to expose the association with microleakage examining morphology of interface resnn-tooth hard tissue under the scanning electron microscope (SEM). Class I occlusal preparations (4x3x2 mm3) were made in 60 extracted human primary molars. Teeth were randomly divided into six groups of 10 samples each. All cavities were restored using a fowable resin composite [Tetric Flow (TF)]. G1: PLP+TF; G2: ME+PLP+TF; G3: TE+PLP+TF; G4: SE+TF; G5: ME+SE+TF; G6: TE+SE+TF. Ali teeth were subjected to thermocyciing for 250 cycles. All samples were immersed nn dye solution for 24 hours for microlrakage test, and then sectioned using a diamond disk. Microleakage in both mesial and distal parts of the cavities was evaluated at 60X magnification under stereomicroscope. Besides, six specimens from each group were randomly selected and examined interface resnne-tooth hard tissue under SEM. Al data were statistically analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found between used materials and application methods in the microleakage (P<0.05). Microleakage values of Group 1 and Group 4 were determined higher than the other groups. The lowest microleakage value was found samples with enamel etch+SE application. As a result, microleakage values of samples with only application PLP and SE were found higher than samples appiication total etch and enamel etch. Total etch or mnne etch application would more useful for reduce to microleakage when used seff etching adhesive in restoration of primary teeth
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı asidik özelliğe sahip olan kendinden pürüzlendiren iki bağlayıcının [Adper Prompt-L-Pop (PLP), Clearfl S E Bond (SE)] uygulama faklılıklarının [mine-etch (ME) ve tota--etch (TE)] mikrosızıntı üzerine etkisini değerlendirmek ve elektron mikroskop (SEM) altında rezin-diş sert dokusu ara yüzey morfolojisini inceleyerek, mikrosızıntı ile ilişkisini ortaya koymaktır. 60 adet çekilmiş nnsan süt azı dişinde sınff I okluzal kavite preparasyonu (4x3x2 mm3) oluşturulmuştur. Dişler her brrinde 10 örnek olacak şekilde rastgele 6 gruba ayrılmıştır. Tüm kaviteler bir akıcı kompozit rezin [Tetric Flow (TF)] kullanılarak restore edilmiştir. G1: PLP+TF; G2: ME+PLP+TF; G3: TE+PLP+TF; G4: SE+TF; G5:ME+SE+TF; G6: TE+SE+TF. Tüm dişlere 250 kez termal si kus uygulanmıştır. Mikrosızıntı testi için, tüm örnekler 24 saat boya solüsyonunda bekletilmiş ve daha sonra bir elmas disk kullanılarak kesit alınmıştrr. Mikrosızıntı kavitelerin hem mesial hem de distal kısmında steromikroskop altında 60X büyütmede değerlendirilmiştir. Ayrıca, her bir gruptan rastgele 6 örnek seçilmiş ve rezin-diş sert dokusu ara yüzeyi SEM altında incelenmiştir. Tüm verller istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Kullanılan materyaller ve uygulanan yöntemler arasında mikrosızıntı açısından faklılık istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (P<0,05). Grup 1 ve Grup 4'de mikrosızıntı değerlerin/n daha yüksek olduğu tespit edilmiştir. En düşük mikrosızıntı değerlerine mnne etch+SE uygulanan örneklerde rastlanmıştır. Sonuç olarak, sadece PLP ve SE uygulanan örneklerin mikrosızıntı değerler, total-etch ve mine-etch uygulanan örneklerden daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Süt dişlerinin restorasyonunda dentin bağlayıcı ajan olarak kendinden pürüzlendiren bağlayıcılar kullanıldığında, total etch veya mine etch uygulaması mikrosızıntı oluşumunu azaltmak iç/n daha fayda! olabilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-kendinden-puruzlendiren-iki-baglayicinin-uygulama-farkliliklarinin-mikrosizinti-uzerine-etkisinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 3
19-28
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Pashley DH, Sano H, Ciucchi B, Yoshyaama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: a review. Dent Mater 1995;11:117-125.
2. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM. Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion. J Dent 1997;25:355-372.
3. Nakabayashi N, Saimi Y. Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 1996;75:1706-1715.
4. Senawongse P, Harnirattisai C, Shimada Y, Tagami J. Effective bond strength of current adhesive systems on deciduous and permanent dentin. Oper Dent2004;29:196-202.
5. Agostnni FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent2001;23:481-486.
6. Torii Y, Itou K, Nsshttani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K. Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to seff-etching primer appiication on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 2002;15:305-308.
7. Mgguez PA, Castro PS, Nunes MF, Watter R, Pererra PN. Effect of acid-etching on the enamel bond of two self-etching systems. J Adhesiv Dent 2003;5:107-112.
8. Miyazaki M, Hnnoura K, Honjo G, Onose H. Effect of seff-etchnng primer appiication method on enamel bond strength. Am J Dent2002;15:412-416.
9. Perdggao J, Geraldeii S, Hodges JS. Total-etch versus self-etch adhesive: effect on postoperative sensttivtty. J Am Dent Assoc 2003;134:1621-1629.
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg.
Cilt:17, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2007, Sayfa: 19-28
GÜRBÜZ, YILMAZ, GÜLER
10. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumiiti P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomzzed controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and wtthout selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 2005;21:375-383.
11. Douglas WH. Clinical status of dentine bonding agents. J Dent 1989;17:209-215.
12. Koibuchi H, Yasuda N, Nakabayashi N. Bonding to dentin with a self-etching primer: the effect of smear layers. Dent Mater 2001;17:122-126.
13. Kwong SM, Cheung GS, Kei LH, Itthagarun A, Smales RJ, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond strengths to sclerotic dentin using a self-etching and a total-etching technique. Dent Mater 2002;18:359-369.
14. Boj JR, Martin AM, Espasa E, Cortes O. Bond strength and micro morphology of a seff-etchnng primer versus a standard adhesive system with varying etching times in primary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent2004;5:233-238.
15. Erhardt MC, Cavaicante LM, Pimenta LA. Influence of phosphoric acid pretreatment on seff-etchnng bond strengths. J Esthet Rest Dent2004;16:33-40.
16. Hara AT, Amaral CM, Pimenta LA, Snnhoreti MA. Shear bond strength of hydrophiiic adhesive systems to enamel. Am J Dent 1999;12:181-184.
17. Hanngg M, Rennhardt KJ, Bott B. Seff-etchnng primer vs phosphoric acid: an atternatvee concept for composite-to-enamef bonding. Oper Dent 1999;24:172-180.
18. Blunck U, Roufet JF. Marginal adaptation of compomer Class V restorations in vttro. J Adhes Dent 1999 Summer;1(2):143-151.
19. Deiiperi S, Bardwef DN, Wegley C. Restoration interface microleakage using one total-etch and three self-etch adhesives. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 179-184.
20. Giachetti L, Scamnnaci Russo D, Bertnni F, Pierfeoni F, Nieri M. Effect of operator skill in relation to microleakage of total-etch and seff-etch bonding systems. J Dent2007; 35:289-293.
21. Cordoso PEC, Sadek FT. Microtensife bond strength on dentin using new adhesive systems with self-etching primers. Braz J Oral Sci 2003; 2:156-159.
22. Inoue S, Vargas MA, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P, Vanherfe G, Sano H, Van Meerbeek B.
Microtensife bond strength of eleven contemporary adhesives to dentin. J Adhes Dent 200; 3: 237¬245.
23. Abo T, Uno S, Sano H. Comparison of bonding efficacy of an all-in-one adhesive with a seff-etchnng primer system. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112: 286-292.
24. Oztaş N, Olmez A. Effects of one versus two-fayer applications of a seff-etchnng adhesive to dentin of primary teeth: a SEM study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6:18-25.
25. Moura SK, Santos JF, Bafester RY. Morphological characterization of the tooth/adhesive interface. Braz Dent J 2006; 17:179-185.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com