You are here

Home » Content

İşletmelerde Bilgi Sistemi Etkililiğini Değerlendirme Yöntemi Üzerine Bir On Çalışma

Journal Name:

  • Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2005

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Assesing the Information systems (IS) function within organizations has been ideniified as one of the most critical issues of Information systems management. Despite the importance of the subject to both executive management and tnformation system professionals, not much progress has been made toward assessing the contribution of the IS function to th enterprise. One reason for this of affairs is the fact that pure IS evaluation is an illusive concept. This paper adresses the problem assessing the IS function and provides a foundation for development of specifıc measures for IS assessment. The issues involved in an IS assessment are discussed along with the need and demand for such assessment. Traditional approaches to IS assessment are presented and a comprehensive approach which considers several perspectives is recommended.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bilgi sisteminin etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi, bilgi sistemi yönetiminin en önemli konulardan birisidir. Bu konu hem işletme yönetimi hem de bilgi sistemleri konusunda çalışan uzmanlar için son derece önemli olmasına rağmen hak ettiği ilgiyi görememiştir. Bunun bir nedeni konunun kendisiyle yakından ilişkilidir. Yani bilgi sistemleri kavramı kendi başına yanıltıcı olabilir. Bu çalışmada iki temel konu üzerinde odaklanılmıştır. Birincisi, bilgi sistemlerinin etkililiğinin ölçülmesindeki problemler, ikincisi ise, bilgi sistemlerinin etkililiğinin ölçülmesinde kullanılabilecek bir temel ölçütün oluşturulmasıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-isletmelerde-bilgi-sistemi-etkililigini-degerlendirme-yontemi-uzerine-bir-calisma.pdf
  • 1
59-69
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Baets, W. R. J. 1996. Some empirical evidence on IS strategy alignment in
banking. Information & Management, 30(4), 155-177. Bakos, Y, Dellarocas, C. 2003. Cooperation without enforcement? A
comparative analysis of litigation and online reputation as quality assurance
mechanisms. In eBusiness Researchat MİT, March26 (Vol. 3(2)). BalI, L, Harris, R, 1982. SMIS Members: A Membership Analysis, MİS
Quarterly, March.
Brancheau, J. C., Janz, B. D., & VVetherbe, J. C. (1996). Key issues in
information systems management: 1994-95 SİM Delphi results. MİS
ûuarterly, 20(2), 225-242. Burnstine, D. 1980. BIAIT: An Emerging Management Engineering Discipline,
vvorking paper, BIAIT International Inc. Business Systems Planning: information Systems Plannimg Guide, 1981. IBM
Corporation.
Buss, M. 1981. Penny-wise Approach to Data Processing, Harvard Business Review, July-August
67
E.Gödelek/ İsletmelerde Bilgi Sistemi Etkililiğini Değerlendirme Yöntemi Ü/erıne Bir Ön Çalışma
Cameron, K. 1980. Critical Çuestions in Assessing Organizational Effectiveness.
Organizational Dynamics, Autumn. Chang, Y. S, Leeb, J. K. 2003. Case-based modi.cation for optimization agents:
AGENT-OPT. Decision Support Systems, 10(56), 1-16. Cyert, R, March, J. 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs,
N.J.:Prentice Hail.
Dickson, G, Leitheiser, R, VVetherbe, J, Nechis, M. 1984. Key Information
Systems Issue forthr 1980' s, MİS Çuarterly, September. Dickson, G, VVetherbe, J. 1985. The Management of information Systems. New
York: McGraw Hill, Inc. Edelman, F. 1981. The Management of İnformation Resources - A Challenge for
American Business, MİS Quarterly, March. Executive issues in information Management, 1984. Coopers&Lybrand
Corporation.
Goodman, P, Pennings, J, 1977. New Perspectives on Organizational
Effectiveness. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers. Hamilton, S, Chervany, N. 1981. Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness
- Part 1 Comparing Evaluation Approaches, MİS Quarterly, September. Hamilton, S, Chervany, N. 1981. Evaluating Information Systems Effectiveness
- Part 2 Comparing Evaluator Viewpoints, MİS Quarterly, December. Hill, C. A., Scudder, G. D. 2002. The use of electronic data interchange for
supply chain coordination in the food industry. Journal of Operations
Management, 20, 375-387. Ives, B, Learmonth, G. 1984. The Information System as a Competitive Weapon,
Communications of the ACM, December. Katz, D, Kahn, R. 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations, New York:
John Wiley and Sons, Inc. King, W., Rodriguez, J. 1978. Evaluating Management information Systems, MİS
Quarterly, September. Leontiades, M. 1982. Management Policy, Strstegy, and Plans. Boston: Little,
Brown and Company. Lusa, J, Winkler, R. 1982. The Real Truth about DP Salaries, İnfosystems, June. Matlin, G. 1977. How to Survive a Management Assessment, MİS Quarterly,
March.
Matlin, G. 1979. What is the Value of Investment in information Systems, MİS
Quarterly, September. March, J, Simon, H. 1958. Organizations, New York: John VVileyand Sons Inc. Merton, A., Severance, D. 1981. Data Processing: A State-of-the-Art Survey of
Attitudes and Concerns of DP Managers, MİS Quarterly, June. McFarlan, F. 1984. İnformation Technology Changes the Way You Compete,
Harvvard Business Review, May-June. McFarlan, F, McKenny, J. 1983. Corporate Information Systems Management:
The issues Facing Senior Executives. Homevvood, Illinois: Richard D.
Invin, Inc.
68
Sosyal Bilimler 3 / 1 (2005) s. 59-69
McFarlan, F, McKenny, J. 1983. The information Archipelago - Governing the
New World, Harvvard Business Review, July-August. McFarlan, F, McKenny, J, Pyburn, P. 1983. The information Archipelago -
Plotting a Course, Harvvard Business Review, January-February McKenna, B.J., Graham, P, 2000. Technocratic discourse: a primer. Technical
Writing and Communication 30 (3). McKenny, J, McFarlan, F. 1982. The information Archipelago - Maps and
Bridges, Harvvard Business Revievv, September-October. Mintzberg, H. 1973. The Nature of Managerial VVork. Englevvood Cliffs, N.J.:
Prentice Hail, Inc.
Nolan, R. 1979. Managing the Crisis in Data Processing, Harvvard Business
Revievv, March-April. Parsons, G. 1983. information Technology: A New Competitive Weapon, Sloan
Management Review, Fail. Project Management Risk Assessment Method, 1982. Honeywell information
Systems Inc. (order number GA09-00). Purdy, C. 1978. The Internal Auditor' s Role In MİS Developments, MİS
Quarterly, December. Rockart, J. 1979. Managers Define Their Own Data Needs, Harvvard Business
Review, March-April. Rooney, D, Hearn, G, Mandevİlle, T, Joseph, R, 2003. Public Policy in
Knowledge-based Economies: Foundations and Framevvorks. Edward
Elgar, Cheltenham.
Simon, H. 1964. On the Concept of Organizational Goal, Administrative Science Quarterly, June.
Standarts for the Professional Practiceof Internal Auditing, 1978. Institute of
Internal Auditors, Altamont Springs, Fla. Thierauf, R, Reynolds, G. 1982. Effective information Systems Management.
Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co. Trevvatha, R, Nevvport, M. 1976. Management - Functions and Behavior. Dallas,
Texas: Business Publications, Inc. Van de Ven, A, Ferry, D. 1980. Measuring and Assessing Organizations. Nevv
York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com