You are here

Home » Content

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ KİŞİLİK TİPLERİNİN SINIF YÖNETİMİNE YÖNELİK TUTUM VE İNANÇLARINA ETKİSİ

THE EFFECT OF PERSONALITY TYPES OF TEACHER CANDIDATES ON THEIR ATTITUDES AND BELIEFS TOWARDS CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

Journal Name:

  • Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of teacher candidates' personality types on their attitudes and beliefs towards classroom management. The research has been prepared according to the scanning model. Totally of 297 teacher candidates participated in the research. In the research, the Keirsey Temperament Sorter II Scale is used to collect data and the Attitude and Belief Inventory is used for classroom control. For the general of the scales the Cronbach Alpha Reliability Coefficients have been found as 0.76 and 0.90. In data analysis, beside descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, Pearson correlation coefficient and the eta square effect size coefficient are used. The most important results obtained at the end of the research are as follows: in terms of personality types it has been determined that the teacher candidates mostly have guardianspersonality type; this is followed by idealists, artisans, and rationals. Teacher candidates' attitudes and beliefs towards classroom management have been found high both in the general of the scale and in dimensions of education management, person management and behavior management. While the levels of teacher candidates 'attitudes and beliefs towards classroom management change according to personality types, positive low, medium and high level relationships have been found between teacher candidates’ personality types and their attitudes and beliefs towards classroom management. It has been found that personality types of teacher candidates affect their attitude and beliefs towards classroom management at medium level.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, öğretmen adayların kişilik tiplerinin sınıf yönetimine yönelik tutum ve inançlarına etkisini değerlendirmektir. Araştırma tarama modeline göre hazırlanmıştır. Araştırmaya toplam 297 öğretmen adayı katılmıştır. Araştırmada verileri toplamak için The Keirsey Temperament Sorter-II ölçeği ve Sınıf Kontrolü Hakkında Tutum ve İnanç Envanteri kullanılmıştır. Ölçeklerin geneli için Cronbach Alpha Güvenirlik Katsayıları 0.76 ve 0.90 olarak bulunmuştur. Verilerin analizinde betimsel istatistiklerin yanında, Kay-Kare testi, Pearson korelasyon katsayısı ve eta kare etki büyüklüğü katsayısı kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonunda elde edilen en önemli sonuçlar şunlardır; kişilik tipleri açısından öğretmen adaylarının en fazla koruyucu kişilik tipine sahip oldukları belirlenirken, bunu idealistler, zanaatçılar ve mantıklılar izlemektedir. Öğretmen adaylarının sınıf yönetimine yönelik tutum ve inançları hem ölçeğin genelinde hem de öğretim yönetimi, birey yönetimi ve davranış yönetimi boyutlarında yüksek düzeyde çıkmıştır. Öğretmen adaylarının sınıf yönetimine yönelik tutum ve inanç düzeyleri kişilik tiplerine göre farklılık gösterirken, öğretmen adaylarının kişilik tipleriyle sınıf yönetimine yönelik tutum ve inançları arasında pozitif yönde düşük, orta ve yüksek düzeylerde ilişkiler olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğretmen adaylarının kişilik tiplerinin sınıf yönetimine yönelik tutum ve inançlarını orta düzeyde etkilediği tespit edilmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_116393_2_pp_199-208.pdf
  • 2
199-208
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Ball, I. L. (2000). Primary teachers and secondary teachers: alike or different types? A look at data from the MBTI Australian data archive. Australian Psychological Type Review, 2 (3), 13-14.
Ball, I. L. (2001). Gender differences in the distribution of types in Australia: Men are from Marble Bar; Women are from Venus Bay. Australian Psychological Type Review, 3, 13-14.
Bosch, K. (2006). Planning classroom management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Burden, P. R. (2000). Powerful classroom management strategies: Motivation students to learn. Corwin Press: Thousand Oaks.
Chambers, S. M., Henson, R. K., & Sienty, S. F. (2001). Personality types and teaching efficacy as predictors of classroom control orientation in beginning teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southwest Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
Decker, L. E., & Rimm-Kaufman, S. E. (2008). Personality characteristics and teacher beliefs among preservice teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly. 35(2), 45-60.
Ditiberio, J. K. (1996). Education, learning styles, and cognitive styles, in A. L. Hammer (Ed.). MBTI Applications: A decade of research on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, pp. 123-166. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.
Ekici, G. (2003). Öğrenme stiline dayalı öğretim ve biyoloji dersi öğretimine yönelik ders planı örnekleri. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi.
Ekici, G. (2008). Sınıf yönetimi dersinin öğretmen adaylarının sınıf yönetimine yönelik tutum ve inanç kazanma düzeyine etkisi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17 (3), 167-182.
Ekici, G., Atik, A. D., Gökmen, A., Altunsoy, S. ve Çimen, O. (2010). An assessment of the relationship between teacher candidates' levels of teacher self-efficacy and levels of their attitudes and beliefs on classroom control. Uluslararası Öğretmen Yetiştirme Politikaları ve Sorunları Sempozyumu II, (ss.1196–1204). Ankara: Hacettepe Üniversitesi Bakü-Azerbaycan ve Azerbaycan Devlet Pedaqoji Üniversitesi.
Ekiz, D., (2003). Eğitimde araştırma yöntem ve metotlarına giriş. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
206
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Mayıs 2013 Cilt:2 Sayı:2 Makale No:23 ISSN: 2146-9199
Erdle, S., Murray, H. G., & Rushton, P. (1985). Personality, classroom behavior and student rating of college teaching effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Education Psychology, 77, 394-406.
Fisher, D., & Rickards, T. (1997). A Way of assessing teacher-student interpersonal relationships in science classes. Paper presented at the National Science Teachers Association Annual National Convention, New Orleans, and USA.
Garvin, J. N. (1999). Interpersonal teacher behavior and student misbehavior and achievement. Unpublished Doctorate Thesis. South Carolina State University, Caroline.
Gencer, A. S., & Çakıroğlu, J. (2007). Turkish preservice science teachers’ efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching and their beliefs about classroom management. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 664–675.
Good, T. L., & J. E. Brophy ( 1986). Educational psychology. London: Longman Inc.
Green, S., Salkind, N., & Akey, T. (2000). Using SPSS for Windows. Analyzing and understanding Data. New Jersey: PracticeHall.
Guild, P.B., & S. Garger. (1998). Marching to different drummers. ASCD, 2nd, Alexandria, USA.
Hadas, M. (2011). Incorporating learning style and personality preferences into an oral communication course syllabus. (ERIC document reproduction service No. ED519104).
Henson, R. K. (2003). Relationships between pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy, task analysis and classroom control management beliefs. Research in the Schools, 10 (1), 53–62.
Henson, R. K., & Chambers, S. M. (2002). Personality type as a predictor of teaching efficacy and classroom control beliefs in emergency certification teachers. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the southwest educational research association, Austin, TX.
Hoang, T. (2009). The contributions of teachers’ credentialing routes and experience levels on classroom management. International Journal of Instruction, 2 (1), 1–14.
Lawrence , P. A.(1993). Personality: Theory and research. Singapore. John Wiley.
Karasar, N. (2006). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi. Ankara: Sanem Matbaacılık San ve Tic. A.Ş.
Kasap, T. B. (2006). Keirsey/Golay öğrenme modelleri ve karakter tipleri teorilerinin piyano eğitimine uygulanması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7 (12), 113–124.
Keirsey, D., & Bates, M. (1984).Please understand me: Character and temperament types. Del Mar, CA: Prometheus Nemesis Book Co. Inc.
Keirsey, D. (1998). Please Understand Me II: Temperament character intelligence by David Keirsey. Prometheus Nemesis Book Company, USA.
Köklü, N., Büyüköztürk, Ş., & Bökeoğlu, Ö. Ç. (2006). Sosyal bilimler için istatistik. Ankara: Pegem-A Yayıncılık.
Martin, N. K., & Baldwin, B. (1995). Beliefs regarding classroom management style: Relationships to particular teacher personality characteristics. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Martin, N. K., & Baldwin, B. (1996). Helping beginning teachers foster healthy classroom management: Implications for elementary school counselors. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 31 (2), 106-113. 207
Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi
Journal of Research in Education and Teaching
Mayıs 2013 Cilt:2 Sayı:2 Makale No:23 ISSN: 2146-9199
Martin, N.K., & Yin, Z. (1997). Attitudes and beliefs regarding classroom management style: Differences between male and female teachers. Paper presented at the 20th annual meeting of the southwest educational research association, Austin. (ERIC document reproduction service No. ED 404 708).
Martin, N.K., Yin, Z., & Baldwin, B. (1998a). Construct validation of the attitudes & Beliefs on classroom control inventory. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 33 (2), 6–15.
Martin, N. K., & Shoho, A. R. (2000). Teacher experience, training & age: The influence of teacher characteristics on classroom management style. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the southwest educational research association, Dallas, TX.
Martin, N. K., Sass, D. A., & Schmitt, T.A. (2012). Teacher efficacy, instructional management, student stressors and burnout: A theoretical model using in-class variables to predict teachers’ intent-to-leave. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28 (2012), 546–559.
McCord, D. M., & Unruh, L. E. (2010). Personality traits and beliefs about diversity in pre-service teachers. Individual Differences Research, 8(1), 1-7.
Mok, Y. F. (2005). Teacher concern and teacher life stages. Research in Education, 73, 53–72.
Myers, I. B., & Myers, P.B. (1997). Kişilik “Farklı tipler farklı yetenekler”, (Çev: Hüsnü Ovacık). İstanbul: Kuraldışı Yayınları, Çizge Matbaacılık Ltd. Şti.
Pasi, R.J. (2001). A climate for achievement. Principal leadership, 2 (4). Retrieved May 18, 2010, from www.principals.org/news/pl_clmt_achvmnt120.cfm.
Roberts, T. G., Moven,D. L., Edgar, D. W., & Harlin, J. F. (2007). Relationships between personality type and teaching efficacy of student teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48 (2), 92-102.
Roberts, T. G., Harlin, J. F., & Briers, G. E. (2007). The relationship between teaching efficacy and personality type of cooperating teachers. Journal of Agricultural Education, 48 (4), 55-66.
Saban, A. (2000). Öğrenme öğretme süreci “ Yeni teori ve yaklaşımlar”. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti.
Sasson, D. (2007). The teacher as a classroom manager: How to use classroom management activities and techniques. Retrieved May 25, 2011, from http://www. classroom-organization.suite101.com/article.cfm/the teacherasaclassroommanager
Silver, H. R., & Hanson, R. (1996). Learning Styles & Strategies.(3rd Edition). Silver Strong & Associates, Inc. USA.
Silver, H., Strong, R., & Perini, M. (2000). So each may learn. ASCD, Alexandria, USA
Smith, D. K. (1981). Classroom management styles and personality variables of teachers and education majors: Similarities and differences. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, CA.
Stephens, P., & Crawley, T. (1994). Becoming an effective teacher. Cheltenham. Stanley Thornes Publishers Ltd.
Wu, M. L.(2006). The new trend of classroom management and instruction. Taipei: Wu-Nan.
Wubbels, T., & Levy, J. (1993). A Comparison of interpersonal behavior of Dutch and American teacher. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 15, 1-18.
Yazıcı, K. (2006). Değerler eğitimine genel bir bakış. Türklük bilimi Araştırmaları, 19, 499–522.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com