You are here

OKUL ÖNCESİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ ÖĞRETMENLİK MESLEĞİNE İLİŞKİN TUTUMLARI VE BAZI KİŞİLİK ÖZELLİKLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİLER

INTERACTIONS AMONG ATTITUDES TOWARD TEACHING AND PERSONALITY CONSTRUCTS IN EARLY CHILDHOOD PRESERVICE TEACHERS

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
The main purpose of this study was to examine early childhood education teachers’ attitudes toward teaching, and their relationship to internal-external locus of control and sociotropy and autonomy orientations. The participants in this study were limited to 180 undergraduate students enrolled in early childhood education in three different universities in Ankara, Turkey. The results showed that the participants had fairly high positive attitudes toward teaching. On the other hand, despite these high positive attitudes, almost half of the participants indicated that their future plans did not include being involved with early childhood education. In general, the demographic characteristics were not significantly related to these attitudes. Attitude toward teaching was negatively related to overall external locus of control and it was not related to internal locus of control at a significant level. In relation to sub-factors, belief in chance and meaninglessness of effort also showed a negative relationship with attitude toward teaching. Attitude toward teaching was not significantly related to either of sociotropy or autonomy orientations. However, when computing correlations with the sub-scales of the Sociotropy and Autonomy Scale, only attitude toward teaching was found negatively correlated with concern about disapproval subscale.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu arastırmanın amacı okul öncesi ögretmen adaylarının ögretmenlik meslegine iliskin tutumları, içseldıssal kontrol odagı yönelimleri ve demografik özellikleri arasındaki iliskileri incelemektir. Veriler, Ankara’daki üç farklı üniversitenin okul öncesi egitim bölümlerinde lisans egitimi almakta olan toplam 180 ögrenciden toplanmıstır. Verilerin analizi, katılımcıların ögretmenlik meslegine iliskin olumlu tutumlarının yüksek oldugunu, ancak bu duruma ragmen, bu katılımcılarının yaklasık olarak yarısının ilerisi için planları söz konusuyken okul öncesiyle ilgili herhangi bir iste çalismayı düsünmediklerini göstermistir. Genel olarak ele alındıgında, demografik özellikler ve tutumlar arasında anlamlı iliskiler bulunmamıstır. Ögretmenlik meslegine iliskin tutumlar ve genel dıssal kontrol odagı arasında olumsuz iliski tesbit edilmisken, tutumlar ve içsel kontrol yönelimlerl arasında anlamlı bir düzeyde iliski saptanmamıstır. Kontrol odagı ölçeginin alt fakörlerinden olan, sansa inanma ve çabalamanın anlamsızlıgı boyutları ise ögretmenlik meslegine iliskin tutumlarla olumsuz iliskiye sahiptirler. Sosyotropi ve otonomi yönelimlerinin her ikisi de ögretmenlik meslegine iliskin tutumlarla anlamlı düzeyde iliskiler göstermemislerdir. Ancak, bu ölçegin alt faktörleri analiz edildiginde, tutumlarla onaylanmama kaygısı alt ölçegi arasında olumsuz bir iliski saptanmıstır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
31-48

REFERENCES

References: 

Beck, A.T., Epstein, N., Harrison, R.P., & Emery, J. (1983). Development of
the Sociotropy-Autonomy Scale. Philedelphia: University of
Pennsylvania.
Belar, C.D., Nelson, P.D. & Wasik, B.H. (2003). Rethinking education in
psychology and psychology in education: The inaugural education
leadership conference. American Psychologist, 58, 678-683.
Boone, W.J., & Gabel, D, (1994). Computers and preservice elementary
science teacher education. Journal of Computers in Mathematics
and Science Teaching, 13, 17-42.
Callahan, R. (1980). A study of teacher candidates’ attitudes. College Student
Journal, 14, 167-175.
Capa, Y., & Cil, N. (2000). Ögretmen adaylarının ögretmenlik meslegine
yönelik tutumlarının farklı degiskenler açısından incelenmesi.
Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 69-73.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L.(1992). Interrogating cultural diversity:
Inquiry and action. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 104-116.
Dag, +. (2002). Kontrol Odagı Ölçegi (KOÖ): Ölçek gelistirme, güvenirlik ve
geçerlik çalısması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 17, 77-90.
Erkus,A., Sanli,N., Bagli, M.T., & Guven,K. (2000). Ogretmenlige iliskin
tutum ölcegi gelistirilmesi, Egitim ve Bilim, 25, (116), 27-33.
Fabrigar, L.R., McDonald, T.K., & Wegener, D.T. (2005). The origin and
structure of attitudes. In D. Albaraccin, B.T. Johnson, and M.P. Zanna
(eds.), The Handbook Of Atttitudes And Attitude Change (pp. 79-
124). Mahwah, NJ:Erlbaum.
Feeney, S., & R. C Feeney, S., Cristensen D. & Moravick, E. (1983). Who I
am in the lives of children: An introduction to teaching young
children. (2nd ed).Colombus, OH: Merill.
Feeney, S., & Chun. R. (1985). Effective teachers of young children. Young
Children, 41,47-52.
Garmon, M.A. (2004). Changing preservice teachers’ attitudes/beliefs about
diversity: What are the critical factors?. Journal of Teacher
Education, 55, 201-209.
Johnson, G.M., & Howel, A.J. (2005). Attitude toward instructional
technology following Required versus optional WebCt usage. Journal
of Technology and Teacher Education, 13, 643-655.
Kagitcibasi, C. (1996). The autonomous-relational self: A new synthesis.
European Psychologist, 1, 180-186.
Lundeberg, M.A., & Levin, B.B. (2003). Prompting the development of preservice
teachers’ beliefs through cases, action research, problem-based
learning, and technology. In J. Raths, A.C. McAninch (Eds.), Teacher
Beliefs and Classroom Performance: The Impact of Teacher
Education (pp.23-42). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
McBride, C., Bacchiochi, J.R., & Bagby, R.M. (2005). Gender differences in
the manifestation of sociotrophy and autonomy personality traits.
Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 129-136.
McMillan, J.H. (2000). Educational research: Fundamentals for the
Consumer.(3th ed.). New York: Longman.
Pajares, F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a
messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307-332.
Pigge, F.L., & Marso, R.N. (1994). Reltionships of prospective teachers’
personality type and locus of control orientation with changes in their
attitude and anxiety about teaching. Mid-western Educational
Researcher, 7, 2-7.
Pigge, F.L. & Marso, R.N. (1997). A seven year longitudinal multi-factor
assessment of teaching concerns development through preparation and
early teaching.Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 225-235.
Raymond-Lorenz, J. (2000). A Study of Early Childhood Preservice
Teachers’Locus of Control and Self-Concept as Compared to Their
Approach to Dicipline. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of
Wisconsin-Stout, Wisconsin. Retrieved September 1, 2005, from,
www.uwstout.edu/lib/thesis/2000/2000lorenzj.pdf.
Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In J. Raths, A.C.
McAninch (Eds.), Teacher beliefs and classroom performance: The
Impact of Teacher Education, (pp.1-22). Greenwich, CT: Information
Age Publishing.
Roberts, N., & Ferris, A. (1994). Integrating technology into teacher education
program. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 2, 215-225.
Ross, D. D,& Smith, W. (1992).Understanding Preservice Teachers'
Perspectives on Diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 43, 94-104.
Rotter, J. B.(1966).Generalized expectations for internal versus external locus
of control of reinforcement. Psychological Monographs, 80, No1
(whole number 609).
Sadowsky, C.J., Blackwell, M., & Willard, J. L. (1985). Locus of Control and
student teacher performance. Education,105, 391-393.
Sahin, N., Ulusoy, N., & Sahin,N.(1993). Exploring the sociotropy-autonomy
dimensions in a sample of Turkish psychiatric inpatients. Journal of
Clinical Psychology, 49, 751-763.
Sato, T., & McCann, D. (1998). Individual differences in relatedness and
individuality: An exploration of two constructs. Personality and
Individual Differences, 24, 847-859.
Savasir, I. & Sahin, N. H. (1997). Bilissel Davranısçı Terapilerde
Degerlendirme:Sık Kullanılan Ölçekler, Ankara: Turk Psikologlar
Dernegi Yayinlari, Ozyurt Matbaacilik.
Shade, R.A., & Stewart R. (2001). General education and special education
preservice teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion. Preventing School
Failure, 46, 37-43.
Shippen et al. (2005). Preservice teachers’ perceptions of including students
with disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 28,
92-99.
Turner, N.D. (2003). Preparing preservice teachers for inclusion in secondary
classrooms, Education,123, 491-496.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com