You are here

Home » Content

Türkiye’nin Antidamping Soruşturmalarını Etkileyen Faktörler: Sanayi Verileri ile Ekonometrik Bir Analiz

Factors affecting Turkey’s Antidumping Petitions: An Econometric Analysis using Industry Data

Journal Name:

  • Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study analyzes the factors that affects the number of antidumping investigations in Turkey using production and import database of domestic industries. Negative Binomial Regression estimates in which the regressors are total employment, output and import growth of domestic industries show that the size of the domestic industry, a fall in output and an increase in the imports increase the number of filings. This findings points the importance of the financial and lobbying power of industries, the ability to compete internationally and the economic performance on antidumping practices.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada yerel sanayiye ait üretim ve ithalat verileri ile Türkiye’deki antidamping soruşturma sayısını etkileyen faktörler analiz edilmiştir. Yerel sanayinin toplam istihdamı, üretim miktarlarındaki ve ürettikleri ürünlerin ithalatındaki yüzdelik değişiklik açıklayıcı değişken olarak kullanılarak tahmin edilen Negatif Binomial Regresyon sonuçlarına göre yerel sanayilerin büyüklüğü, üretimlerindeki azalma ve iç piyasada ithalattan dolayı artan rekabetin soruşturma sayılarını arttırdığı bulunmuştur. Bu bulgular yerel sanayilerin mali gücü ve lobicilik yetisinin, ayrıca uluslarası rekabet edebilme gücü ve ekonomik performasının antidamping uygulamaları açısından önemini ortaya koymaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-turkiyenin-antidamping-sorusturmalarini-etkileyen-faktorler-sanayi-verileri-ile-ekonometrik-bir-analiz.pdf
  • 1
41
54
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Aggarwal, A., (2004), “Patterns and Determinants of Anti-Dumping: A Worldwide
Perspective”. World Development, 32(6), 1043-1057.
Avsar V. (2013), ‘’Antidumping, Retaliation threats and Export Prices’’, World Bank
Economic Review, 27(1), 133-148.
Avsar. (2013), ‘’Trade effects of Turkey’s Antidumping Duties’’, Uludağ Üniversitesi
İİBF Dergisi, baskıda.
Belderbos, R. (1997), “Antidumping and Tariff Jumping: Japanese Firms DFI in the
European Union and the United States.” Review of World Economics, 133 (3), 419-
45.
Bown, C. P. (2008), The WTO and antidumping in developing countries. Economics
& Politics, 20(2), 255-288. (Erişim: 23.07.2013).
Bown, C. (2012), “Global Antidumping Database.” Washington, DC:
http://econ.worldbank.org/ttbd/gad.
Dişbudak, C. ve K. Türkcan (2005), Antidamping Uygulamalarının Ekonometrik
Analizi: Türkiye Örneği. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, 20(233), 149-164.
Feinberg, R. ve K. Reynolds (2006), “The Spread of Antidumping Regimes and the
Role of Retaliation in Filings.” Southern Economic Journal, 72 (4), 877-90.
Ganguli, B. (2008), “The Trade Effects of Indian Antidumping Actions.” Review of
International Economics 16(5), 930-94.
Knetter, M.. ve T. J. Prusa, (2003), “Macroeconomic Factors and Antidumping
Filings: Evidence from Four Countries”. Journal of International Economics, 61, 1-
17.
Konings, J., ve H. Vandenbussche. (2005), "Antidumping protection and markups
of domestic firms." Journal of International Economics, 65(1), 151-165.
Lasagni, A. (2000), Does Country-Targeted Antidumping Policy by the EU Create
Trade Diversion, Journal of World Trade 34(4), 137-159.
Malhotra N., ve H. Rus. (2009), “The Effectiveness of the Canadian Antidumping
Regime.” Canadian Public Policy 35(2), 187-202
Prusa T. (2001), “On the Spread and Impact of Antidumping.” Canadian Journal of
Economics 34 (3), 591-611.
Staiger, R. ve F. Wolak. (1994), “Measuring Industry Specific Protection: Antidumping
in the United States,” Microeconomics, 1994, 51-103.
ESKİŞEHİR OSMANGAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ İİBF DERGİSİ
50
Zanardi, M. ve M. Moore (2011), " Trade Liberalization and Antidumping: Is There
a Substitution Effect?," Review of Development Economics, 15(4), 601-619.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com