You are here

Biyoloji Öğrencilerinin Motivasyon Tarzlarının Tespiti

A Diagnostic study of biology students’ motivational styles

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aimed to reveal the motivational styles of biology students and to find out the gender difference regarding motivational styles. Students’ motivational styles were explored by a questionnaire whose items were written to correspond to four motivational pattern: achievement, curiosity, conscientious and sociability. A total of 164 university students who were studying biology in the faculty of science participated in this study. The results showed that i) for the whole sample, the numbers of curious and socialstudents are fairly higher than the achiever and the conscientious students however, there are differences for each level, ii) more boys than girls appeared as achiever, on the other hand, moregirls than boys appeared as conscientious. The implication of the results for teaching and learning biology as well as for instructional materials is discussed in the light of findings of other studies given in the literature.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, biyoloji öğrencilerinin motivasyon tarzlarınıbelirlemek ve eşey farklılıklarınıortaya koymaktır. Öğrencilerin motivasyon tarzları, başarı, meraklılık, bilinçlilik ve sosyallik bağlamında ölçen bir anket formuyla belirlenmiştir. Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi biyoloji bölümünde okuyan 164 öğrenci çalışmaya katılmıştır. Sonuçlar, tüm örneklemde meraklıve sosyal öğrencilerin sayısının, başaran ve bilinçli öğrencilerden daha fazla olduğunu ama her düzey içinde farklılıkların ortaya çıktığınıii) erkek öğrencilerin kız öğrencilerden daha fazla başaran tipinde, fakat kız öğrencilerde erkeklere nazaran daha fazla bilinçli tipinde bulunduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuçların biyoloji öğrenimi ve öğretimi ve aynı zamanda öğretim teknikleri açısından etkisi literatürdeki bulguların ışında tartışılmıştır.
23-34

REFERENCES

References: 

Adar, L. 1969, A Theoretical Framework for the Study of Motivation in Education,
Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Al-Naeme, F.F. 1991, The influence of various learning styles on practical problem
solving in chemistry in Scottish secondary school, Ph.D. Thesis, University
of Glasgow.
Anderson, A. and Draper, S.W. 1991, Computers in Education, 17(1), 1.
Armstrong, S.J. 2000, Educational Psychology, 20(3), 323.
Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D. and Hanesian, H. 1978. Educational Psychology, Holt
Rinehart and Wiston, London.
Bahar, M. and Hansell, M.H. 2000,Educational Psychology, 20(3), 349.
Biggs, J.B. 1987. Student approaches to learning and studying, Plenum, New York.
Cana-Garcia, F. and Hewitt, H.E. 2000, Educational Psychology, 20(4), 413.
Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G. and Ryan, R.M. 1991, Educational
Psychologist, 26, 325.
Hofstein, A. and Kempa, R.F. 1985, European Journal of Science Education, 7, 221.
Hofstein, A. and Walberg, H.J. 1995, Instructional Strategies, in: B.J. Fraser & H.J.
Walberg (Eds) Improving Science Education, University of Chicago Press,
Chicago.
Johnstone, A.H. 1997, Know how your pupils learn, and teach them accordingly, in:
D.L. Thompson (Ed) Monitoring Changein Education: Science Education
in 21
st
Century,Arena, Hants.
Johnstone, A.H. and Al-Naeme, F. 1995, International Journal of Science Education,
17(2), 219.
Kempa, R.F. and Diaz, M.M. 1990a, International Journal of Science Education,
12(2), 195.
Kempa, R.F. and Diaz, M.M. 1990b, International Journal of Science Education,
12(2), 205.
Kolb, D.A. 1984. Experiential learning. Experience as the source of learning and
development, Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, NJ.
Lyall, R.K. and Johnstone, A.H. 1999, University Chemistry Education, 3(2), 68.
Smith, J. 2002, Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 391, 63-70.
Solomon, J. 1996. Group discussions in the classroom, School Science Review,
72(261), 29.
Trumper, R. 1995, British Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 505.
Witkin, H.A. and Goodenough, D.R. 1981, Cognitive styles: essence and origins
field dependence and field independence,New York University Press, New
York.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com