You are here

Home » Content

Yüksek Eğitimde Eleştirel Düşüncenin Durumu ve Anlayışı

Current State and Understanding of Critical Thinking in Higher Education

Journal Name:

  • Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This paper reviews the literature of Critical Thinking (CT) in higher education of modern societies. Some cornerstone studies on CT are discussed in relation with the other influential works of educational pioneers by referring to key definitions. Also, the current state of CT skills, tendencies and beliefs of educators, the state undergraduates and graduate students in academic environments are accentuated so as to discuss the need of improving CT in our country
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu makale Eleştirel Düşünce (ED) literatürünü yüksek eğitim bağlamında incelemektedir. ED üzerine en önemli çalışmalar, eğitim bilimlerinde bu konuya öncülük etmişbilimadamlarının yorumlarıyla ilişkilendirilerek ve temel tanımlara dayanarak tartışılmıştır. Bunların yanısıra, ülkemizde ED’nin gelişmesine katkı sağlamak adına ED’nin yüksek eğitimde günümüzdeki yeri, eğitimcilerin eğilim ve görüşleri ve yüksek eğitim öğrencilerinin durumlarıüzerinde durulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-yuksek-egitimde-elestirel-dusuncenin-durumu-anlayisi.pdf
  • 2
109-127
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Anderson, L. W. E. & Krathwhol, D. R. E. (Eds.). (2001). A Taxonomy forLearning,
Teaching and Assessment A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives. (Vol. 1). New York: Longman.
Bailin, S., Case, R., Coombers, J. R., &Daniels, L. B. (1999). Conceptualizing Critical
Thinking. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Volume 31-3, 285-302
Bloom B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook I: The Cognitive
Domain.New York: David McKay Co Inc
Bloom, B. S. & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The
Classification of Educational Goals, by a Committee of College and
University Examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman,
Green.
Barnett, R. (1997). Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham, UK: Society for
Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 28, Sayı2 (2008) 109-127 126
Cathers, W. H. (2000) The apology by Plato: An introduction, presented at the Aspen
Institute Community Great Ideas Seminar: Aspen, CO
Dewey, J. (1933). Experience and Education.New York: Macmillan.
Ennis, R. H. (1991). Critical Thinking: A Streamlined Conception. Teaching
Philosophy, Volume 14-1,
Ennis, R. H. (1993). Critical Thinking Assessment: Theory into Practice, Vol.32, No.3,
p. 179-186
Glaser, R, E. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American
Psychologists, Volume 39-2, 93-104.
Gardiner, L. (1995). Redesigning Higher Education: Producing Dramatic Gains in
Student Learning (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, vol. 23, no. 7).
Facione, P. A. (1989). Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes
of Educational Assessment and Instruction: Research Findings and
Recommendations (The Delphi Report). ERIC Doc No: ED. 315 423.
Facione, P.A., Facione N. C., and Giancarlo, C. (2000). The Disposition toward Critical
Thinking: Its Character, Measurement, and Relationship to Critical Thinking
Skills, Journal of Informal Logic, Volume 20-1 61-84.
Fisher, St. (2001). Making Hope Practical and Despair Unconvincing: Some
Thoughts on Transformative Education. Appalachian Journal,29(1-2), 90-
97.3.
Kearsley, G. (2003, April 10). Cognitive Dissonance (L. Festinger). In Explorations in
Learning & Instruction:The Theory into Practice Database
(2006Januaray 13,)
Kurfiss,J, G. (1988). Critical Thinking: Theory, research, practice, and possibilities. In
ASHE-ERIC Higher Education report no.2Washington, DC: Association for
the Study of Higher Education.
Ikuenobe, P. (2001). Questioning as an Epistemic Process of Critical Thinking:
Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 33, Nos. 3 & 4
İşpiroğlu, Z. (1996). Düşünmeyi Öğrenmek ve Öğretmek İstanbul: Cem Yayınevi
McCarthy, M, C (2004). Critical Thinking Disposition, Belief Perspective, and
Academic Performance: Examining Relationships. Doctoral Thesis, UMI
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 28, Sayı2 (2008)109-127 127
3124282
McPeck, J. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. New York: St.Martin’s Press
Moore, T. (2004). The Critical Thinking Debate: How General are General Thinking
Skills? Higher Education Research & Development.23 (1), 3 – 18.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A Nation at Risk: The
Imperative for Educational Reform.Washington DC.
Norris, S.P. (1985). Synthesis of Research on Critical Thinking. Educational
Leadership, 42 (8), 40-45
Paul, W.R. (1990). Critical Thinking: What every personneeds to survive in a rapidly
changing world. Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking
Paul, W.R. (1993) Critical Thinking: How to Prepare Students for a Rapidly Changing
World.Santa Rosa, CA: Foundation for Critical Thinking.
Paul, W.R., Elder, L. & Bartell, T. (1997). California Teacher Preparation for
Instruction in Critical Thinking: Research Findings and Policy
Recommendations. Sacramento, CA: California Commission of Teacher
Credentialing
Paul, W.R. (2004, July 20) The State of Critical Thinking Today: The Need for a
Substantive Concept of Critical Thinking As the Organizerin Developing
Blueprints for Institutional Change < http://www.criticalthinking.org.> (2005,
December 14)
Pohl, A. (2005). Language Learning Histories: An Introduction To Critical Thinking,
18th Annual EA Education Conference,English Language Centre, Swinburne
University of Technology
Pithers, R. & Soden, R. (1999). Assessing Vocational Tutors' Thinking Skills. Journal of
Vocational Education and Training, 51, 23-37.
Steen, L. (1987). Mathematics Education:A Predictor of Scientific Competitiveness.
Science, 237, 251-252, 302

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com