You are here

İlköğretim 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Okuduğunu Anlama, Okuma Motivasyonu ve Okuma Alışkanlıkları Arasındaki İlişki

The Relationship Between 5 th Graders’ Reading Comprehension, Reading Motivation and Reading Habits

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study aimed wheter or not reading comprehension was affected directly by intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, and indirectly by the mediation of the reading habit. The study group comprised a total of 481 fifth graders from the lower, middle and upper socioeconomic levels. Accoding to the results of the study intrinsic motivation was found to have a positive effect on reading comprehension. It was also found that extrinsic motivation affects reading comprehension negatively but that its “competition” dimension affects reading comprehension positively. The results showed that intrinsic motivation, not extrinsic, is effective when reading stems from students’ personal tendencies. Students seemed to spend time on reading materials that tap their interests and curiosities outside school. However, during school -related reading hours, extrinsic motivation seemed to have a stronger effect. The results also showed that students’ reading habits did not affect their reading comprehension directly
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada içsel ve dışsal okuma motivasyonunun okuduğunu anlamayı doğrudan ve okuma alışkanlığı aracılığıyla dolaylı olarak etkileme durumu test edilmiştir. Araştırma ilişkisel tarama modeli çerçevesinde yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu alt, orta ve üst sosyoekonomik düzeye mensup toplam 481 ilköğretim 5. sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma sonuçları, içsel motivasyonun okuduğunu anlamayı olumlu yönde etkilediğini;rekabet faktörü hariç dışsal motivasyonun ise olumsuz yönde etkilediğini göstermiştir. Öğrencilerin okulda daha çok dışsal motivasyon nedeniyle okuduğu, kişisel tercihlerine dayalı okumalarında ise içsel motivasyonun etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Öğrencilerin okuma alışkanlıklarının okuduğunu anlama başarısına doğrudan etkisinin olmadığı belirlenmiştir.
793-815

REFERENCES

References: 

Akyol, H. (2005). Türkçe ilkokuma yazma öğretimi. Ankara: Pegem A Yayıncılık.
Aslanaoğlu, A. E. (2007). PIRLS 2001 Türkiye verilerine göre 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin
okuduğunu anlama becerileriyle ilgili faktörler. Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi.
Ankara Üniversitesi, Ankara.
Alexander, P. A. & Jettton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and
developmental perspective. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R.
Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (3rd ed., pp. 285 – 311). New York:
Longman.
Baker, T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children‟s motivation for reading and
their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research
Quarterly, 34, 2- 29.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 31, Sayı 3 (2011) 793-815 813
Baker, L., Dreher, M.J., & Guthire, J.T. (2000). Why teachers should promoter reading
engagement. In L. Baker,M .J. Dreher, & J.T. Guthrie (Eds.), Engaging young
readers: Promoting achievement and motivation (1-16). New York: Guilford.
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human
behavior. New York: Plenum
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L.G., and Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and
education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–
346.
Dökmen, Ü. (1995). Okuma becerisi, ilgisi ve alışkanlığı üzerine bir araştırma.
İstanbul: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları.
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals.
Educational Psychologist, 34, 169–189.
Fransson, A. (1984). Cramming or understanding? Efffect of intrinsic extrinsic otivation
on approach to learning and test performance. Alderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds),
Reading in a foreign language (pp.86–115). London: Longman.
Gottfried, A. E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school
children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 525-538.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L. & Cox, K. E. (1999) 'Motivational and
cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount'. Scientific Studies
of Reading, 3, 231- 256.
Guthrie, J.T., Anderson, E., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of concept-oriented reading instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning From text.
Elementary School Journal, 99, 343-366.
Güneş, F. (2009). Hızlı okuma ve anlamı yapılandırma. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement
goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational
Psychologist, 33, 1–21.
Harackiewicz, J.M., Pintrich, P.P., Barron, K.E., Elliot, A.J.& Thrash, TM.(2002).
Revision of achievement goal theory: necessary and illuminating. Journal of
Educational Psychology, 94, 638-645.
Hİdİ, S. (2000). An interest researcher‟s perspective: the effects of extrinsic and
intrinsic motivation factors on motivation. In. C. Sansoe & j. M. Harackiewicz.
(Eds). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The research for optimal motivation and
performance. (pp: 309-339). San Diego, CA: Academic Pres.
Karasar, N. (2002). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Maehr, M.L.& Zusho, A.(2009). Achievement goal theory. Tha past, presnt, anf future.
In K., R. Wentzel and A. Wigfield (Eds). Handbook of motivastion at School. New
York: Routledge.
GÜ, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 31, Sayı 3 (2011) 793-815 814
Meece, J.L., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Hoyle, R.H. (1988). Students‟ goal orientations and
cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology,
80, 514-523.
Meece,J.L. ve Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students‟ achievement goals.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 582-590.
Meece, J. L., & Miller, S.D.(1999). Changes in elementary school children achievement
goals for reading and writing: Results of a longitudinal and an intervention study.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 207-230.
Ryan, R.M., & Decı, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classicd efinitions
and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67.
Schallert, D.L., & Reed,J .H. (1997). The pull of the text and the process of involvement
in reading. In J.T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating
readers through integrated instruction (pp. 68-85). Newark,D E: International
Reading Association.
Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual
differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
Şimşek, Ö. F. (2007). Yapısal eşitlik modellemesine giriş. Ankara: Ekinoks.
Wang, J. H., & Guthire, T. J. (2004). Modeling the effect of intrinsic motivation,
extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text
comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly,
39, 2, 162-186.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children‟s motivation for reading to
the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89,
420–432.
Wolters, C.A., Yu, S.L., & Pıntrıch, P.R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation
and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and
Individual Differences, 8, 211-238

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com