You are here

Home » Content

Farklı Anaçların 0900 Ziraat Kiraz Çeşidinde Vejetatif Gelişim, Meyve ve Verim Özellikleri Üzerine Etkileri

Effects of Rootstocks On Growth, Fruit And Yielding Characters Sweet Cherry Cultivar 0900

Journal Name:

  • Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the effect of Gisel A®5 (Prunus cerasus x P. canescens), GiselA®6 (P. cerasus x P. canescens), and P. mahaleb L.seedling (control) rootstocks on vegetative growth, yield, phenological, pomological and morphological characteristics of Sweet Cherry 0900 cultivar was investigated. Compared to GiselA®5 with GiselA®6, and P. mahaleb, reduced significantly tree growth. Average of total tree volume of GiselA®5 was small smaller than GiselA®6 and Prunus mahaleb L., respectively 57,70% and 26,03 %. Trunk cross-sectional area of sweet cherry 0900 cv at the end of the 4 rd year was 29,31 cm2/tree, 48,99 cm2/tree and 30,47 cm2/tree on grafted GiselA®5, GiselA® 6 and P. mahaleb L seedling rootstock respectively. The soluble solid were not affected by rootstocks. The highest fruit diameter (24,64 mm) and fruit weight (7,95 gr) was determined in 0900 Ziraat/GiselA® 5 combinations. The trees that are grafted on Gisel A® 5 collapsed down.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu araştırmada, GiselA®5 (Prunus cerasus x P. canescens), GiselA®6 (P. cerasus x P. canescens) ve mahlep çöğür (kontrol) (P. mahaleb L) anaçları üzerine aşılanmış 0900 Ziraat kiraz çeşidinin vejetatif gelişme, verim, fenolojik, morfolojik ve pomolojik özellikleri incelenmiştir. GiselA®5 anacı üzerine aşılı ağaçların ortalama taç hacim değerleri GiselA®6 anacına göre % 57,77; mahlep anacına göre ise %26,03 oranında daha düşük değerde tespit edilmiştir. GiselA®5, Gisel A®6 ve mahlep üzerine aşılı ağaçlarda ortalama birim gövde kesit alanı değerleri, dördüncü vejetasyon yılı sonunda sırasıyla 29,31 cm2/ağaç, 48,99 cm2/ağaç ve 30,47 cm2/ağaç olarak bulunmuştur. Anaçların meyvelerin SÇKM içeriği üzerine etkisi olmamıştır. Anaçlar arasında en yüksek meyve çapı (24,64 mm) ve en yüksek meyve ağırlığı (7,95 g) GiselA®5 anacı üzerindeki ağaçlarda tespit edilmiştir. GiselA®5 anacı üzerindeki ağaçlarda yüksek oranda devrilmeler saptanmıştır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159097_28_pp_37-43.pdf
  • 1
37-43
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Anonim 2005. www.arastirma- yalova.gov.tr
Anonymous, 2007. www.puphort.org.actabook
Anonim, 2008. www.tuik.org.tr.
Bujdoso, G., Hrotko, K. and Stehr, R., 2004. Evaluation of sweet and sour cherry cultivars on German dwarfing rootstocks in hungary. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 12: 233-244
Burak M.,Akçay M., Yalçınkaya E.,Türkeli Y., 2008.Effect of Some Clonal Rootstocks on Growth and Earliness of ‘0900 Ziraat’ Sweet Cherry, Proc.5th IS on Cherry, Acta hort. 795, ISHS: 199-202
Erdoğan, B., 1998. Tokat’ta yetiştirilen bazı kiraz çeşitlerinin fenolojik, özelliklerinin belirlenmesi üzerine bir araştırma, Gaziosmapaşa Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Bahçe Bitkileri, Anabilim Dalı Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Tokat.
Facteau, T.J., Rove, K. E. and Chestnut N.E., 1986. Firmness of sweet cherry fruit following grow in New York . Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 57:169- 178
Fischer, R.R., von Elbe, J.H., Schuler R.T., Bruhn H.D., and Moore J.D., 1996. Some physical properties of sour cherries, Trans. ASAE, p:175-179.
Gyeviki, M., Bujdoso, G. and Hrotko K., 2008. Results of cherry rootstock evaluations in Hungary. International Journal of Horticultural Science 2008, 14 (4): 11-14 Agro inform Publishing House, Budapest, Printed in Hungary ISSN 1585-0404.
Kader, A.A., 1983. Post-harvest quality maintenance of fruits and vegetables in developing countries. Post-harvest Physiology and Crop Production, Plenum, New York, p:455-470.
Kappel, F. and Lichou J., 1994. Flowering and fruiting of ‘Burlat’ sweet cherry on size-controlling rootstock. Hortscıence 29(6):611–612.
Lauri, P.E. and Claverie, J., 2005. Extinction training of sweet cherries in France Appraisal after six years. Acta. Hort. 667:367–371.
Lenahan, O. and Whiting, M.D., 2006. Fish oil plus lime sulphur shows potential as a sweet cherry postbloom thinning agent. Hort Science 41:860–861.
Long, L.E., Nunez-Elisea R. and Cahn H., 2009.Cherry rootstock selection and management. http://viverosur.com/g12/infoosu.pdf
Reına, A., Gıorgıa, V., 1987. Biometrical and chemical measurement on fruits of six cultivaris of sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) during growth. Horth. Abs., 57(1), 18.
Riesen, W. and Ladner, J., 1998. Hohe ertrage mit den neuen Kirschenunterlagen. Schweiz. Z. Obst- Und Weınbau 24: 609- 611Studman C.J.,1994. Quality in fresh fruit-meaning, measurement and maintenance. Ag. Eng Mileno, Report N 94-G-080, 1-9.
Santos, A., Santos, R.R., Cavalheiro, J., Cordeiro, V. and Lousada, J.L., 2006. Initial growth and fruiting of ‘Summit’ Sweet Cherry (Prunus avium) on five rootstocks. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 34 (3): 269- 277.
Schaumberg, G. and Gruppe, W.,., 1985. Growth and fruiting habit of Prunus avium cv. ‘Hedelfingen’ on clonal cherry hybrid rootstock. Acts Hort. 169:227-233.
Sıve, A. and Resnızky, D., 1986. Experiments on the Storage of Rainier and Bing cherries. Hort. Abs., 56(2):88.
Szot, B. and Stepniewski, A., 1999. Significance of the investigation of physical properties of plant raw metarial for food industry. Int. Agrophysics, 13:411-415.
Szot, I.and Meland, M., 2001. Influence of rootstocks on size distribution and fruit quality of sweet cherry cultivars Int. Agrophysics, 2001, 15, 207-204.
Ugolik M. and Kantorowicz-Bak M., 1996. The influence of dwarfing rootstocks of series GM on growth and yield of sweet cherry (in Polish). Proc. XXXIV Conf. on Pomology, p:172-173.
Younce, F.l. and Davis, D.C., 1985. A dynamic sensor for cherry firmness. ASAE, 38 (5):1467-1476.
Webster, A.D. and Schmidt, H., 1995. Rootstocks for sweet and sour cherries, p. 127–163. In: A.D. Webster and N.E. Looney (eds.). Cherries, crop physiology, production and uses. CAB Intl., Oxford, U.K.
Whiting, M.D.,.Lang, G. and Opharth, D., 2005. Rootstocks and training system affect sweet cherry growth yield and fruit quality, Hort Science 40(3):582:586.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com