You are here

“THE ADHERENCE OF CANDIDA ALBICANS ON SURFACE OF DIFFERENT DENTURE BASE MATERIALS (AN IN-VITRO STUDY)”

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction: Over the years researchers have reported on the frequency and distribution of yeast in the oropharynx of apparently normal individuals and those with systemic or mycotic diseases wearing dentures. Hence this study was undertaken with the objective of evaluating the in-vitro adherence of Candida Albicans to different denture base materials namely self cure acrylic resin, heat cure acrylic resin & chrome cobalt alloy. Materials and Method : Thirty set of specimens were made per denture base material (Ashwin self cure acrylic resin, Lucitone 199- Dentsply heat cure acrylic resin and Chrome cobalt alloy-Bego, Germany). The specimen size was 1cm X 1cm (length) and 2mm (width). Culture preparation and growth of Candida Albicans on the specimens was conducted. Results & Conclusion : From our present study, it can be concluded that Chrome cobalt alloy showed less adherence to candidial cells, followed by heat cure acrylic resin and last self cure acrylic resin. The results were statistically highly significant.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
576-581

REFERENCES

References: 

(1) Devarhubli AR, Subbarao VK, Patil NP. Surface adherence of Candida albicans to different polymethyl
methacrylate resin denture base materials. World Journal of Dentistry 2011;2(3):237-42.
(2) Davenport JC. The oral distribution of Candida in denture stomatitis. Brit Dent J 1970;129:151.
(3) Jorgenson Budtz Ejvind. Clinical aspects of Candida infection in denture wearers. JADA 1978;96:474.
used for this study were self cure acrylic resin, heat cure
acrylic resin and chrome cobalt base metal alloy. Acrylics
and metals have been used in the fabrication of denture
bases; however, acrylics have been more widely used.
Acrylics though economical and easy to manipulate,
show some features such as water sorption and
permissive surface in contrast to metallic denture bases.9
These features may alter the degree of adherence of
Candida albicans to acrylics, which may be contrasting to
the metals. Among the metals, gold has been shown to
have better surface topography than acrylics.10 However,
the use of gold is impracticable. Therefore, chrome
cobalt, a commonly used metallic denture base material,
is been used in this study.
The methodology chosen here was based on a
study by John F. Miner(1973) with following
modifications. An incubation period of 48 hours was
considered for all the specimen groups. Therefore, the
adherence of the cells was observed only for the tissue
surface of the specimens, keeping in mind of the fact that
Candida albicans is mainly seen thriving in this surface.11
The polished surface of a denture on the other hand,
presents a smooth and glossy texture, which is not much
capable of harboring fungi and bacteria as compared to
the rough surface.12 Moreover, the unpolished fitting
surface is more capable of absorbing infected oral fluids
than the polished surface, thus creating a suitable
environment for the microorganisms to grow.13
CONCLUSION :
The following conclusions were drawn from our present
study :
1. Chrome cobalt alloy denture base material showed less
adherence of candidial cells compared to heat cure and self
cure acrylic resin denture base materials.
2. Among the acrylics, heat cure acrylic resin showed
comparatively less adherence of candidial cells than self cure
acrylic resin.
Above findings suggest that the metallic denture bases are
far better than acrylic denture bases in terms of incidence of
denture stomatitis due to candidial infection. Further, they are
seemed to be more biocompatible with the oral tissues with
minimal tissue reactions if any.14 However, usage of these
base metal alloys as denture bases may not be practicable in
regard to their cost, difficulty in relining the necessary set up
for their fabrication. Thus, acrylic resins still remain the
materials of choice answering the requisites of economy and
ease of fabrication. However, patient’s oral hygiene should
be given prime importance irrespective of the denture base
materials used.
Indian Journal of Basic & Applied Medical Research; March 2013: Issue-6, Vol.-2, P. 576-581
581
www.ijbamr.com
(4) Olsen Ingar. Denture stomatitis; Occurrence and distribution of fungi. Acta Odont Scand 1974;32:329-33.
(5) Samaranayake LP, Mc Farlane TW. An in vitro study of adherence of Candida albicans to acrylic surfaces.
Arch Oral Biol 1980;25:603-09.
(6) Jorgenson Budtz E. Denture stomatitis V Candida Agglutinins in Human Sera. Acta Odont Scand
1972;30:313-25.
(7) Arendorf TM, Walker DM. Denture stomatitis: A review. J Oral Rehab 1987;14:217-27.
(8) Cawson RA. Role of Candida. Dent Practit 1965;16:138-42.
(9) Braden M. The absorption of water by acrylic resins and other materials. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14:307-16.
(10) Miner John F. The nature of denture base : A key factor in denture base mouth sore mouth. J Prosthet Dent
1973;29(3):250-55.
(11) Kalla R, Rao H, Sunilkumar MV. Surface adherence of Candida Albicans to different
polymethylemethacrylate denture base resins. International Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2011;2(1):2-7.
(12) Stysiak ZD. Allergy as a cause of denture sore mouth. J Prosthet Dent 1971;25:16-18.
(13) Gruber RG, Lucatarto EM, Molnar EJ. Fungus growth on tissue conditioners and soft denture liners. Rev
Dent Liban 1968;18(3):36-43.
(14) Smith Dennis C, Williams David F. Biocompatibility of dental materials. Florida, CRC press, Inc, 4:273.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com