ÁLVAREZ, I.; ESPASA, A.; GUASCH, T. (2011). The value of feedback in improving collaborative
writing assignments in an online learning environment. Studies in Higher Education, 37(4):
387-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.510182
BUCHANAN, T. (2000). The efficacy of a World-Wide Web mediated formative assessment.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16: 193-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-
2729.2000.00132.x
DEMPSEY, J.V.; WAGER, S.U. (1988). A taxonomy for the timing of feedback in computer-based
instruction. Educational Technology, 28(10): 20–25.
ESPASA, A. (2008). El Feedback en el marc de la regulació de l’aprenentatge: Caracterització i
anàlisi en un entorn formatiu en línia. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Available online in:
http://www.tdx.cat/browse?value=Espasa+Roca%2C+Anna&type=author
ESPASA, A. (2010). Time factor in e-learning and assessment. eLearnCenter Research Paper
Series, (1). Available online in: http://elcrps.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/elcrps/article/view/issue1-espasa
GIBBS, G.; SIMPSON, C. (2004). Conditions under which assessment support students’
learning. Learning Teaching in High Education, 1: 3-31.
GUASCH, T.; ESPASA, A.; ÁLVAREZ, I. (2010). Formative e-feedback in collaborative writing
assignments: the effect of the process and time. eLC Research Paper Series, 1, 49-59
HYLAND, F. (2001). Providing Effective Support: Investigating feedback to distance language
learners. Open Learning, 16(3): 233-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02680510120084959
HYLAND, F. (2003). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System,
31: 217-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6 KLUGER, A.N.; DENISI, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A
historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory.
Psychological Bulletin, 119(2): 254-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254
KRAMARSKI, B.; ZEICHNER, O. (2001). Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning:
Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Educational Media International, 38(2-3),
77-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09523980110041458
KULHAVY, R.W.; STOCK, W.A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response
certitude. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 279-308. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01320096
LEY, K. (1999). Providing feedback to distance students. Campus-Wide Information Systems,
16(2): 63-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10650749910272016
MARTÍNEZ, M.J.; JUAN, A.A.; CASTAN, J. (2010). Using the Critical Incident Technique to
Identify Factors of Service Quality in Online Higher Education. International Journal of
Information Systems in the Service Sector, 2(4), 57-72. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jisss.2010100104
MASON, J.; BRUNNING, R. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: what
the resear ch tel l us. University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Available online in:
http://dwb.unl.edu/Edit/MB/MasonBruning.html
MORY, E.D. (2004). Feedback research revisited. Handbook of research on educational
communications and technology, 2: 745-783.
NARCISS, S. (2004). The impact of informative tutoring feedback and self-efficacy on
motivation and achievement in concept learning. Experimental Psychology, 51(3): 214-228.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.3.214
NARCISS, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J.M. Spector, M.D.
Merrill, J. Van Merriënboer & M.P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational
Communications and Technology (Aect). New Jersey (EUA): Lawrence Erlbaum.
NARCISS, S.; HUTH, K. (2004). How to design informative tutoring feedback for multimedia
learning. In H.M. Niegemann, R. Brünken & D. Leutner (Eds.), Instructional Design for
Multimedia Learning (pp. 181-195). Münster: Waxmann.
NARCISS, S.; HUTH, K. (2006). Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related
tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction. Learning and
Instruction, 16(4): 310-322. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.003 NARCISS, S.; KÖRNDLE, H.; REIMANN, G.; MÜLLER, C. (2004). Feedback-seeking and
feedback efficiency in web-based learning– How do they relate to task and learner
characteristics?. In A.P. Gerjets, P.A. Kirschner, J. Elen & R. Joiner (Eds.), Instructional
design for effective and enjoyable computer- supported learning. Proceedings of the first
joint meeting of the EARLI SIGs Instructional Design and Learning and Instruction with
Computers (pp. 377-388). Tuebingen: Knowledge Media Research Center.
RICE, M.; MOUSLEY, J.; DAVIS, R. (1994). Improving student feedback in distance education:
a research report. A T. Evans & D. Murphy (Eds.), Research in distance education (pp. 52-
62). Geelong (Australia): Deaking University Press.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com