Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry as Contexts for the Learning of Science and Achievement of Scientific Literacy

Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). The influence of history of science courses on students’ conceptions of the nature of
science. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Oregon State University.
Aikenhead, G. (1973). The measurement of high school students’ knowledge about science and scientists.
Science Education, 57(4), 359-349.
Akindehin, F. (1988). Effect of an instructional package on preservice science teachers’ understanding of the
nature of science and acquisition of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 72(1), 73-82.
Allen, N.J., & Crawley, F.E. (1998). Voices from the bridge: Worldview conflicts of Kickapoo students of
science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 111-132.
Alvarez, W., & Asaro, F. (1990, Oct.) An extraterrestrial impact. Scientific American, 78-84.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford
University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: A Project
2061 report. New York: Oxford University Press.146 Lederman, Lederman, & Antink
Bady, R. A. (1979). Students’ understanding of the logic of hypothesis testing. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 16(1), 61-65.
Billeh, V. Y., & Hasan, O. E. (1975). Factors influencing teachers’ gain in understanding the nature of science.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12(3), 209-219.
Broadhurst, N. A. (1970). A study of selected learning outcomes of graduating high school students in South
Australian schools. Science Education, 54(1), 17-21.
Carey, R. L., & Stauss, N. G. (1968). An analysis of the understanding of the nature of science by prospective
secondary science teachers. Science Education, 52(4), 358-363.
Carey, R. L., & Stauss, N. G. (1970). An analysis of experienced science teachers’ understanding of the nature
of science. School Science and Mathematics, 70(5), 366-376.
Central Association of Science and Mathematics Teachers (1907). A consideration of the principles that should
determine the courses in biology in the secondary schools. School Science and Mathematics, 7, 241-247.
Chalmers, A. F. (1982). What is this thing called science? (2nd ed.). Queensland, Australia: University of
Queensland Press.
Courtillot, V. (1990, Oct.) A volcanic eruption. Scientific American, 85-92
Durkee, P. (1974). An analysis of the appropriateness and utilization of TOUS with special reference to highability students studying physics. Science Education, 58(3), 343-356.
Glen, W. (1990). What killed the dinosaurs? American Scientist, 78, 354-370
Haukoos, G. D., & Penick, J. E. (1985). The effects of classroom climate on college science students: A
replication study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(2), 163-168.
Hrdy, S. B. (1986). Empathy, polyandry, and the myth of the coy female. In R. Bleier (Ed.), Feminist
approaches to science (pp. 119-146). Perganon Publishers.
Jones, K. M. (1969). The attainment of understandings about the scientific enterprise, scientists, and the aims
and methods of science by students in a college physical science course. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 6(1), 47-49.
Kawagley, A.O., Norris-Tull, D., & Norris-Tull, R.A. (1998). The indigenous worldview of Yupiaq culture: Its
scientific nature and relevance to the practice and teaching of science. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 35(2), 133-144.
Kimball, M. E. (1967-68). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 110-120.
Klopfer, L. E. (1969). The teaching of science and the history of science. Journal of Research for Science
Teaching, 6, 87-95.
Klopfer, L. E., & Cooley, W. W. (1963). The history of science cases for high schools in the development of
student understanding of science and scientists. Journal of Research for Science Teaching, 1(1), 33-47.
Klopfer, L. E., & Watson, F. G. (1957). Historical materials and high school science teaching. The Science
Teacher, 24(6), 264-293.
Lavach, J. F. (1969). Organization and evaluation of an inservice program in the history of science. Journal of
Research in Science Teaching, 6, 166-170.
Lawson, A. E. (1982). The nature of advanced reasoning and science instruction. Journal of Research in Science
Teaching, 19, 743-760.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331-359.
Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (1998). Avoiding de-natured science: Activities that promote
understandings of the nature of science. In W. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science
education: Rationales and strategies, pp.83-126. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Lederman, N. G., & Niess, M. (1997). The nature of science: Naturally? School Science and Mathematics,
97(1), 1-2.
Lederman, N. G., & O’Malley, M. (1990). Students’ perceptions of tentativeness in science: Development, use,
and sources of change. Science Education, 74(2), 225-239.
Liu, A.Y., & Lederman, N.G. (2007). Exploring prospective teachers’ worldviews and conceptions of nature of
science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1281-1307.
Lovejoy, C. O. (1981). The origin of man. Science, 211, 341-350.
Luchessa, K., & Lederman, N. G. (1992). Real fossils, real science. The Science Teacher, 59, 68-92.
Mackay, L. D. (1971). Development of understanding about the nature of science. Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 8(1), 57-66.
Matthew, M. R. (2009). Teaching the philosophical and worldview components of science. Science &
Education, 19, 697-728.
Mead, M., & Metraux, R. (1957). Image of the scientist among high school students. Science, 126, 384-390.
National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic
Press.