You are here

Home » Content

FARKLI KANÜL TİPLERİNİN KANAL YIKAMA İŞLEMİNDEKİ ETKİNLİKLERİNİN RADYOİZOTOP TEKNİĞİ İLE KARŞILAŞTIRMALI OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

COMPARATIVE INVESTIGATION OF THE FLUSHING EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT TYPES OF. NEEULESBYA RADIOISOTOPE TECHNOQUE

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1997

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The purpose of this study was to compare the flushing effectiveness of three deferent needles fey using a radioisotope technique. Thirty freshly extracted single rooted maxillary incisor teeth were used. The root canals of teeth were injected with the radioactive solution containing the complex oj w>»<Tc-DMSA following the root canal instrumentation. The teeth were randomh divided into three experimental groups. The root canals were irrigated with conventional need¬le in group I, blunted needle in group 2 and perforated needle in group 3, using with sterile saline solution as an irri-gant. Âe amount ofradiactivily was measured using gama camera following the root canal irrigation There was no statistical difference among the needles in 'respect of their flushing effectiveness.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı 3 farklı kanül tipinin kanal yıkama işlemindeki etkinliğini radyoizotop tekniği ile karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemektir. Çalışmada yeni çekilmiş 30 adet üst keser diş kullanıldı. Kök kanallarının genişletilmesini takiben, "Tc-DMSA kompleksi içeren radyoaktif solüsyon kanala enjekte edildi. Dişler tesadüfi olarak 3 gruba ayrıldı. Kök kanalları 1. grupta alışılagelmiş, 2. grupta ucu kunt, 3. grupta delikli kanül ile irrigasyon solüsyonu olarak serum fizyolojik kullanılarak yıkandı. Herbir örnek için yıkamadan sonra kanalda kalan radyoaktivite miktarı gama kamera yardımıyla ölçüldü. Yıkama işleminin etkinliği bakımından kamiller arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunamadı (p>0.05).
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-kanul-tiplerinin-kanal-yikama-islemindeki-etkinliklerinin-radyoizotop-teknigi-ile-karsilastirmali-olarak-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 3
160
164
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.
Alaça
m T. Endodonti, Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Ba-sım-Yayln Yüksek Okulu Basımevi, 1990: 376.
2. Baker NA, Eleazer PD, Averbach RA, Seltzer S. Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigating solutions. JEndod 1975: 1:127-35.
3. Berg MS, Jacobsen EL, Begole EA, Remeikis NA. A comparison of five irrigating solutions: a scanning electron microscopic study. JEndod 1986: 12:192-7.
4. Bitter NC. A 25% tannic acid solution as a root canal ir-rigant cleanser: a scanning electron microscope study. Oral Surg 1989: 67:333-7.
5. Chehaitly A, Alory M. Knowledge, attitudes, and professional behaviors of third-and fourth- year dental students concerning AIDS and hepatitis II. J Dent Educ 1995: 59:844-9.
6. Chohabey AA. Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C: What you should know. Compendium\992: 13:776-81.
7. Chow TW. Mechanical effectiveness of root canal irrigation. JEndod 1983: 9:475-9.
8. Dcckard H, Cox PH. Principles of radiopharmacy. 1st ed. Dordrecht, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987: 67.
9. Dewanjee MR The chemistry of 99»Tc labelled radiopharmaceuticals. Seminars in Nuclear Medicine 1990: 20:5-27.
10. Drobotij E, Grower MF, Peters DD, Lorton L, Bernier WE. Comparison of the flushing effectiveness of four different types of needles after root canal preparation. JEndod 1980: 6:870-5.
11. Dusheiko GM, Smith M, Schcucr PJ. Hepatitis C virus transmitted by human bite, lancet 1990: 336:503-4.
12. Goldberg F, Abramovich A. Analysis of the effects of EDTAC on the dentinal walls of the root canal. JEndod 1977: 3:101-5.
13. Goldman M, KronmanJH, Goldman LB, Clausen H, Grady J. New method of irrigation during endodontic treat¬ment. JEndod 1976: 2:257-60.
14. Goldman LB, Goldman M, Kronman JH, Lin PS. Scanning electron microscope study of a new irrigation method in endodontic treatment. Oral Surg 1979: 48:79-83.
15. Grieco M. Needle stick and AIDS. NYJ Dent 1990: April-May: 8.
16. Grossman LI, Meiman BW. Solution of pulp tissue by chemical agents./ADA 1941: 28:223-5.
17. Hardie J. An update on human immunodeficiency virus and infection control. J Can Dent Assoc 1990: 56:423-6.
18. Ingle JI, Mullancy TA, Grandich RA, Taintor JF, Fahid A. Endodontic cavity preparation. In: Ingle JI, Taintor JF, eds. Endodontics. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, lea&Febiger, 1985: 178¬85.
19. Morgan RW, Carnes DL, Montgomery S. The solvent effects of calcium hydroxide irrigating solution on bovine pulp tissue./£nrforf 1991: 17:165-8.
20.
Özat
a F, Kanal tedavilerinde yeni bir irrigasyon yöntemi. EÜDİşhekDerglÇ>79: 4 (Özel Sayı): 47-54.
21.
Özat
a F, Erdilek N, Tczel H. Konvansiyonel ve delikli iğneler kullanılarak yapılan kök kanal irrigasyon un un smear üzerine olan etkisinin karşılaştırılması: SEM çalışması. EÜDİs-hekDergl989; Özel Sayı: 1-22.
22. Ram Z. Effectiveness of root canalirrigalion. OralSurg 1977: 44: 306-12.
23. Rome WJ, Doran JF, Walker WA. The effectiveness of glyoxide and sodium hypochlorite in preventing smear layer formation. JEndod 1985: 11:281-8.
24. Salzgeber RM, Brilliant JD. An in vitro evaluation of the penetration of an irrigating solution in root canals. JEndod 1977: 3:394-8.
25. Scnia ES, Marshall JF, Rosen S. The solvent action of sodium hypochlorite on pulp tissue of extracted teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971: 31:96-103.
26.
Tane
r MS, Köseoğlu K, Duman Y. Gama kamera ile radyofarmasötik kalite kontrolü. Ulusal Nükleer Tıp Kongresi Tebliği, İstanbul, Mayıs 1996.
27. Teplitsky BL, Chenail BL, Mack B, Machnee CH. Endodontic irrigadon - a comparison ofendosonic and syringe delivery systems. IntEndod/1987: 20:233-41.
28. Trepagnier CM, Madden RM, Lazzari EP. Quantitati¬ve study of sodium hypochlorite as an in vitro endodontic irri-gant./Ended 1977: 3: 194-6.
29. Tucker JW, Mizrahi S, Seltzer S. Scanning electron microscopic study of the efficacy of various irrigating solutions: urea, Tubilicid Red and Tubilicid Blue. JEndod 1976: 2:71-8.
30. Wayman BE, Koop WM, Pinero GJ, Lazzari EP. Citric and lactic acids as root canal irrigants in vitro. JEndod 11)79: 5: 258-65.
31. Yamada RS, Armas A, Goldman M, ün PS. A scanning electron microscopic comparison of a high volume final flush with several irrigating solutions: part 3. JEndod 1983: 9:137¬42.
32. Zach A, Kaufman AY. Quantitative evaluation of the influence of dequalinium acetate and sodium hypochlorite on human dentition. Oral Surg 1983: 55:524-6.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com