You are here

Home » Content

TOPRAĞIN ADLİ KARAKTERİSTİĞİ

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Fakültesi Mecmuası

Publication Year:

  • 1995-1996
Author Name
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Çeşitli tanımlan olmakla beraber toprak; adli açıdan, yeryüzünde ya da yeryüzüne yakın kısımlarda parçalanmış olarak bulunan yüzey materyali olarak tanımlanabilir. Toprak adli olaylarda sınıfsal delil olarak değerlendirilir. Şüphelinin giysisinde, ayakkabısında veya bir otomobilde bulunan kurumuş çamur veya toprak ile olay yerindeki toprak örnekleri mukayese edilerek şüphelinin veya nesnenin olay yeri ile ilişkisi ortaya çıkartılabilir. Toprak ve toprakla ilgili materyallerin adli incelenmelerinde çeşitli metotlar kullanılmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-topragin-adli-karakteristigi.pdf
  • 1-2
461-464
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Çepel, N., 1985. Toprak Fiziği, İstanbul üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayını, Matbaa Teknisyenleri Basımevi, İstanbul, 200-13.
Çepel, N., 1988. Toprak ilmi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayını, Taş Matbaası, istanbul, 7-9, 11-14, 59-65
Dudley, R. J., 1976. A Colorimetric Method for the Determination of Soil Saccharide Content and Its Application in Forensic Science. Med. Sci. Law., 16: 226-31.
Dudley, R.J., 1976. A Simple Method for the Determining the pH Small Soil Samples and its Use in Forensic Science. J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 16: 21-27.
Dudley, R.J., 1976. The Particle Size Analysis of Soils and Its Use in Forensic Science-the Determination of Particle Size Distributions within the Silt and Sand Fractions J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 16:219-29.
Dudley, R.J., 1975. The Use of Color in the Discrimination Between Soils. J. Forensic Sci. Soc., 15 (3): 209-18.
Dudley, R.J., 1979. The Use of Density Gradient Columns in the Forensic Comparison of Soils. Medicine, Science and the Law., 19 (1): 39-48.
Dudley, R.J., Smaldon., K.W., 1978. The Evaluation of Methods for Soil Analysis Under Simulated Scenes of Crime Conditions. Forensic Sci. Int., 12 (1): 49-60.
Elzeroth, R., Elzerman., T., 1981: "Soil and Rock Evidence" in the Crime Scene Techician Manual. Police Training Institute, Department of Law Enforcement. Illinois, 241-48, 302.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1978. "Mineralogy" in Handbook of Forensic Science. Washington D.C., 29-31,130-31. J'.
Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1981. "Mineralogy Examinations" in Handbook of Forensic Science. Washington D.C. 45-66, 130-31.
Graves, W. J., 1979. A Mincralogical Soil Classification for the Forensic Scientist. J. Forensic Sci., 24(2): 323-38.
Kantarcı, M., 1987. Toprak İlmi. istanbul üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Yayını, Matbaa Teknisyeni Basımevi, İstanbul, 1-3.
Kelley, C. M., 1973. "Soils, Rocks, Minerals and Debris" in Crime Scene Research and Physical Evidence Handbook. U.S. Department of Justice. 80-83.
La Follette, B.C., 1981. "Soils and Sand" in Criminal Investigation of Physical Evidence Handbook Third Edition. Wisconsin Department of Justice, 123-25.
McCrone, W.C., 1982. Soil Comparison and Identification of Constituents. The Microscope, 30, 17-25.
Murray, C.R., 1982. "Forensic Examination of Soil" in Forensic Science Handbook (Saferstein R. ed.) Regents/Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey, 654-71.
Murray, C.R., Tedrow., J.C.F., 1975. Forensic Geology, Earth Sciences and Criminal Investigation. Rutgers University Press. New Brunswich, New Jersey. 3-15, 109-64.
Peterson, J.L., 1980. "The Team Approach in Forensic Science" in Modern Legal Medicine, Psychiatry and Forensic Science (Curran W. J., Mc Gary A.L. and Petty C.S. eds.) Part 5, Chapter 44: 1000.
Petraco, N., 1986. Trace Evidence- The Invisible Witness. J. Forensic Sci., 31 (1): 321-28.
Pctraco, N., De Forest., P.R., 1993. "A Guide to the Analysis of Forensic Dust Specimens" in Forensic Science Handbook (Saferstein R. ed.) Vol. 3, Regents/Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 51-57.
Rao, T.S., Prabhakar, M., Bhatia, R.Y.P., 1991. Ash Analysis in Crime Investigation. Adli Tıp Dergisi, 7 (3-4): 99-102.
Reuland, D.J., Trinler, W.A., 1981. An Investigation of the Potential of HPLC for Comparison of Soil Samples. Forensic Sci. Int., 18 (4): 201-208.
Robertson, J., Thomas, B., Caddy, B., and Lewis, A.J.M., 1984. Particle Size Analysis of Soils-A Comparison of Dry and Wet Sieving Techniques Forensic Sci. Lit., 24: 209-17.
Saferstein. R., 1981. Criminalistic An Introduction to Forensic Scince, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 82-89.
Saito, Y. and Hayano., 1979. Application of High Performance Aqueous Gel Permeation Chromatography to Humic Substances from Marine Sediment. J. Chromatography, 125 (2): 119-24.
Siegel, J.A., Precord, C, 1985. The Analysis of Soil Samples by Reverse Phase-High Performance Liquid Chromatography Using Wavelength Ratioing. J. Forensic Sci., 30 (2): 511-25. t
Thornton, IX, Fitzpatric., F., 1975. Forensic Science Characterization of Sand. J. Forensic Sci., 20 (4): 460-75.
Thornton, J.I., Mclaren A.D., 1975. Enzymatic Characterization of Soil Evidence. J. Forensic Sci., 20 (4): 674-92.
Turner, R.F., Hilton O., 1949. "Collection and Preservation of Evidence" in Forensic Science and Laboratory Technics. Charles C. Thomas-Publishers Springfield, U.S.A. Chapter 3: 52.
Wanogho, S., Gettinby, G., and Caddy, B., 1987. Particle Size Distribution Analysis of Soil Using Laser Diffraction. Forensic Sci. Int., 33: 177-28.
Wanogho, S., Gettinby, G., Caddy, B., and Robertson, J., 1985. A Statistical Method for Assessing Soil Comparisons. J. Forensic Sci., 30: 864-72.
Wanogho, S., Gettinby, G., Caddy, B., and Robertson, J., 1987. Some Factors Affecting Soil Sieve Analysis in Forensic Science. I. Dry Sieving. Forensic Sci. Int., 33: 129-37.
Wanogho, S., Gettinby, G., Caddy, B., and Robertson, J., 1987. Some Factors Affecting Soil Sieve Analysis in Forensic Science. 2. Wet Sieving. Forensic Sci. Int., 33: 139-47.
Williams, J.C., 1982. "Soil" in Physical Evidence Handbook. Oregon State Police Crime Laboratory Division. 39-41, 112.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com