You are here

MÜHENDİSLİK VE BÖTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN BİLGİSAYAR PROGRAMLAMA ÖĞRENMEYE DÖNÜK TUTUMLARI

ENGINEERING AND CEIT STUDENT’S ATTITUDE TOWARDS LEARNING COMPUTER PROGRAMMING

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS_690
Abstract (2. Language): 
It is commonly reported in the literature that there are problems related to computer programming learning which requires high level cognitive skills. There could be various reasons for this phenomenon, among them; the negative attitude of the students towards computer programming learning would be a common factor. In this context, the aim of this study is to determine the attitude of the students, which are from the department of computer engineering, electrical&electronic engineering and from the department of Computer and Instruction Technologies Education. The study is conducted as descriptive, quantitative scan model. The study group consists of 731 students from eight different universities. The study data are collected using “Scale for Attitude toward Computer Programming Learning” (α=0,87). Series of tests such as frequency percent, arithmetic mean, standard deviation, t-test, single directional variance analysis and LSD (p<0,05) are conducted on the data. The findings are summarized as follows: Despite that students have a high level of sureness that the learning of computer programming is necessary, they have a middle level of enthusiasm to acquire this skill. If the fact is taken into consideration that students’ subjects require the computer programming skills in their professional life, be expected to have more positive attitudes towards learning computer programming. However, on the basis of the results obtained, it can be said that student’s attitudes towards computer programming are enough positive. The attitude of the computer engineering students is more positive compared to the attitude of the rest of students. The universities, that the students enrolled, have substantial effects on the students’ attitude. The attitude of the male students towards computer programming learning is meaningfully higher than that of the female students.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Üst düzey düşünme becerilerine sahip olmayı gerektiren bilgisayar programlamanın öğrenimine dönük güçlükler yaşanması, alanyazında sık sık karşılaşılan durumlardandır. Yaşanan güçlüklerin pek çok nedeni olabilir. Bu nedenlerden biri de öğrencilerin bilgisayar programlamaya dönük tutumlarının yeterince olumlu olmaması olabilir. Bu çerçevede bu araştırmanın amacı Bilgisayar Mühendisliği, Elektrik-Elektronik Mühendisliği ve Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi (BÖTE) Bölümü öğrencilerinin bilgisayar programlama öğrenmeye dönük tutumlarını belirlemektir. Araştırma, tarama modelinde yürütülen betimsel nitelikli nicel bir çalışmadır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 8 farklı üniversitede öğrenim gören 731 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma verileri “Bilgisayar Programlama Öğrenmeye dönük Tutum Ölçeği” (α=0,87) kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler üzerinde, frekans yüzde, aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma, t testi, tek yönlü varyans analizi ve LSD testleri kullanılmıştır (p<0,05). Özetle şu sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır: Öğrenciler, genel olarak bilgisayar programlama öğrenmenin gerekliliğine yüksek düzeyde inanmakta, ancak öğrenmeye orta düzeyde isteklilik duymaktadırlar. Öğrencilerin bilgisayar programlama öğrenimini önemli ölçüde gerekli görürlerken, bu becerileri öğrenmeye dönük orta düzeyde istekli oldukları görülmektedir. Öğrencilerin özellikle bilgisayar programlamaya mesleki olarak çok ihtiyaç duyacakları branşlarda öğrenim gördükleri düşünülürse, bilgisayar programlama öğrenmeye dönük tutumlarının daha olumlu olması beklenebilir. Ancak elde edilen sonuçlara dayanarak, öğrencilerin bilgisayar programlamaya dönük tutumlarının yeterince olumlu olduğu söylenebilir. Bilgisayar mühendisliği öğrencilerinin tutumları diğer bölümlere göre daha olumludur. Öğrenim görülen üniversiteler öğrencilerin tutumları üzerinde etkilidir. Erkek öğrencilerin bilgisayar programlama öğrenmeye dönük tutumları, bayan öğrencilere göre anlamlı derecede daha yüksektir.
1169-1185

REFERENCES

References: 

ANASTASIADOU, S.D. & KARAKOS, A.S. (2011). The beliefs of electrical and computer engineering students’ regarding computer programming. The International Journal of Technology, Knowledge and Society, 7(1): 37-51.
ASKAR, P. & DAVENPORT, D. (2009). An investigation of factors related to self-efficacy for java Programming among engineering students .The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology TOJET. 8(1): 26-32.
BENNEDSEN, J. (2003). Teaching Java programming to media students with a liberal arts background. Available at: http://www.ics.heacademy.ac.uk/events/presentations /439_bennedsen2.doc
CROOP, F. (2000). Effects on attitudes toward computer programming of using java versus c++ to teach introductory programming to non-computer science majors. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics / Science Education and Technology, (p. 426). AACE. Retrieved from: http://www.editlib.org/p/15486.
ERDOGAN, Y., AYDIN, E. & KABACA, Y.T. (2008) Exploring the Psychological Predictors of Programming Achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35(3): 264-270.
FANG, X. (2012). Application of the participatory method to the computer fundamentals course, Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction. Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, 137: 185-189.
GERÇEK, C., YILMAZ, M., KÖSEOĞLU, P. & SORAN, H. (2006). Biyoloji Eğitimi Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğretiminde Öz-Yeterlik İnançları, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 3 (1), 57-73.
GEVA-MAY, I. HAZZAN, O. & WAGNER, S. (1993). Computer Studies and their
1183
Özgen KORKMAZ - Halis ALTUN
Effect on Learners' Attitude towards Computer Programming: An Evaluation Case Study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25:4, pp. 473-487.
GOMES, A. & MENDES, A.J.(2007). Learning to program-difficulties and solutions. International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEE.
HAWI, N. (2010). Causal attributions of success and failure made by undergraduate students in an introductory-level computer programming course. Computers & Education 54, 1127–1136, Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.020.
HERNANE, B., P., GILNEY F., Z., & MARCELO A., M.(2010). Learning computer programming: Implementing a fractal in a Turing machine. Computers & Education 55 767-776 Doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.03.009
HWANG, G., WU, P. & CHEN, C. (2012). An online game approach for improving students’ learning performance in web-based problem-solving activities. Computers & Education, 59: 1246–1256. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.05.009.
JENKINS, T. (2002). On the difficulty of learning to program. in Proc. of the 3 rd Annu. LTSN_ICS Conf., Loughborough University, United Kingdom, pp. 53-58.
KATAI, Z., JUHASZ, K., & ADORJANI, A. K. (2008). On the role of senses in education. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1707–1717. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.002.
KORKMAZ, Ö. & ALTUN, H. (On Press). A Validity and reliability study of the Learning Computer Programming Attitude Scale (LeCoPAS).
KORKMAZ, Ö. (2012). The Impact of Critical Thinking and Logical-Mathematical Intelligence on Algorithmic Design Skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(2):173-193. DOI: 10.2190/EC.46.2.d.
KORKMAZ, Ö. (2013). Students’ Difficulties in and Opinions about Designing Algorithms According to Different Instructional Applications. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies , 5(1).209-218.
LAI, C., WANG, Q. & LEI, J. (2012). What factors predict undergraduate students' use of technology for learning? A case from Hong Kong. Computers & Education, 59(2): 569–579. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.006.
LANDRY, J.P., PARDUE, J.H., DORAN, M.V. & DAIGLE, R.J. (2002). Encouraging Students to Adopt Software Engineering Methodologies: The Inf luence of Structured Group Labs on Beliefs and Attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1):103-108
LAU, W.W.F. & YUEN, A.H.K. (2009) Exploring the effects of gender and learning styles on computer programming performance: implications for programming pedagogy. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp.696–712. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00847.x
Mühendislik ve Böte Öğrencilerinin Bilgisayar Programlama Öğrenmeye Dönük Tutumları 1184
LAU, W.W.F. & YUEN, A.H.K. (2011). Modelling programming performance: Beyond the influence of learner characteristics. Computers & Education, 57: 1202–1213. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.002
LAWRENCE, A., W., BADRE, A. & STASKO, J. ,T. (1994). Empirically evaluating the use of animations to teach algorithms. in Proc. of the IEEE Symposiumon Visual Languages, St. Louis, MO, pp. 48-54.
MCDOWELL, C.E., WERNER, L., BULLOCKI H. E., & FERNALD, J. (2003). The Impact of Pair Programming on Student Performance and Pursuit of Computer Science Related Majors. International Conference on Software Engineering, Portland, Oregon. Available at: http://wenku.baidu.com/view/09432408f78a6529647d53be.html
MILNE, I. & ROWE, G. (2002). Difficulties in Learning and Teaching Programming—Views of Students and Tutors. Education and Information Technologies, 2002, 7(1): 55-66.
NURAZIAN M.D., SUZANA B., HASLIZATUL F.M.H., & ISMASSABAH I., (2007). Development of Instruments for Measuring Learning Attitudes Towards Computer Programming. In: National Conference on Programming Science (ATUR 07), 5 December 2007, Pacific KLIA, Selangor.
PIORO, B. T. (2004). Performance in an introductory computer programming course as a predictor of future success for engineering and computer science majors. International Conference on Engineering Education, Gainesville, FL.
RAY, C.M., SORMO-UNEN, C. & HARRIS, T.M. (1999). Men’s and Women’s attitudes toward computer technology: A comparison. Office Systems Research Journal, 17( 1):1-8.
ROBINS, A. ROUNTREE, J., & ROUNTREE, N.(2003). Learning and Teaching Programming: A Review and Discussion. Computer Science Education, 13( 2), 137–172.
SACKS, C., BELLISIMO, Y. & MERGENDOLLER, J (1993) Attitudes toward computers and computer use: the issue of gender. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 26: 257-269.
SELÇUK, Z. (1999). Eğitim Psikolojisi: Gelişim ve Öğrenme. Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
SENEMOĞLU, N. (2007). Gelişim, Öğrenme ve Öğretim: Kuramdan Uygulamaya. Ankara: Gönül Matbaacılık.
TAN, P., TING, C. & LING, S. (2009). Learning Difficulties in Programming Courses: Undergraduates’ Perspective and Perception. International Conference on Computer Technology and Development,42-46. doi:10.1109/ICCTD.2009.188
VAN DE GAE, E. & GRISAY, A., SCHULZ, W. & GEBHARDT, E. (2012).The Reference
1185
Özgen KORKMAZ - Halis ALTUN
Group Effect An Explanation of the Paradoxical Relationship Between Academic Achievement and Self-Confidence Across Countries. Journal Of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 43(8): 1205-1228 doi: 10.1177/0022022111428083.
WANG, Y., LI, H., FENG, Y., JIANG, Y., & LIU, Y. (2012). Assessment of programming language learning based on peer code review model: Implementation and experience report. Computers & Education, 59: 412–422. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.007

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com