You are here

Home » Content

Assessment of the Seedling Reactions of Some Hulless Barley Genotypes to Drechslera teres f. maculata

Journal Name:

  • Selcuk Journal of Agriculture And Food Sciences

Publication Year:

  • 2014

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The seedling reactions of three barley cultivars, one hulless barley cultivar, two candidate hulless barley lines and nine hulless barley genotypes were determined under greenhouse conditions to ten isolates of Drechslera teres f. maculata, the causal agent of spot form of net blotch. Isolates were obtained from Ankara, Çankırı, Eskişehir, Kayseri, Konya and Şanlıurfa provinces. The reactions of the cultivars and hulless cultivar ranged between suscepible-resistant. The reactions of the hulless candidate lines and genotypes ranged between resistant-moderately resistant-moderately susceptible with the exception of Candidate line 8 which showed a moderately susceptible reaction to the 3 isolates. There were differences among the reactions of the cultivars and genotypes to the isolates of the fungus. Isolates showed some differences in pathogenicity for each cultivar. Generally, resistance was found among the hulless barley cultivars and genotypes to Drechslera teres f. maculata. Tomarza isolate was the most virulent isolate.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-assessment-seedling-reactions-some-hulless-barley-genotypes-drechslera-teres-f-maculata.pdf
  • 2
63
68
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Aktaş H (1987). Untersuchungen Uber Die physiologi-sche Variationen von Drechslera teres (Sacc.) Sho-emaker an der Mittelanatolien angebauten Gersten und die Feststellung der Reaktionen der Gerstensor-ten gegen diesen Erreger. Journal of Turkish Phyto-pathology 16:53 – 65.
Aktaş H (1995). Reaction of Turkish and German barley varieties and lines to the virulent strain T4 of Pyre-nophora teres. Rachis 14 (1/2): 9-13.
Aktaş H (1997). Untersuchungen Nuber die Netz-fleckenkrankheiten (Drechslera teres Shoem. f.sp. teres Smedeg. D. Teres Shoem. f.sp. maculata Smedeg.) an Gerste. Journal of Turkish Phytopathol-ogy 26: 17 – 22.
Douiyssi A, Rasmusson DC, Roelfs AP (1998). Re-sponses of barley cultivars and lines to isolates of Pyrenophora teres. Plant Disease 82: 316-321.
FAO (2011). http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx
Gamba F, Tekauz A (2000). First report of differential virulence in Uruguayan isolates of Pyrenophora te-res. In: Logue S, editor. 8th International Barley Ge-netics Symposium 22-27 October 2000; Adelaide, South Australia: pp. 113-114.
Geçit H, Emeklier Y, İkincikarakaya S, Adak MS, Kol-sarıcı Ö, Ekiz H, Altınok S, Sancak C, Sevimay CS, Kendir H (2009). Tarla Bitkileri. Ankara. Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
Harlan JR (1992). Crops and man. 2nd ed. Wisconsin. USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America.
Karakaya A, Akyol A (2006). Determination of the seedling reactions of some Turkish barley cultivars to the net blotch. Plant Pathology Journal 5(1): 113-114.
Kün E (1996). Tahıllar-1 (Serin İklim Tahılları). An-kara. Turkey: Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları.
Liu Z, Elwood SR, Oliver RP, Friesen TL (2011). Pyre-nophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen. Molecular Plant Pathology 12: 1-19.
Mathre DE (1982). Compendium of barley diseases. Minnesota: APS Press.
Mızrak G, Yalvaç K (2001). Ülkemizde buğday ve arpa tarımının bugünkü durumu ve geleceği. Ziraat Mü-hendisliği 332: 7-15.
Newman CW, Newman RK (2008). Barley for Food and Health Science, Technology, and Products. New Jer-sey: Wiley.
Shipton WA, Khan TN, Boyd WJR (1973). Net blotch of barley. Review of Plant Pathology 52: 269 – 290.
Tan A (1998). Current status of plant genetic resources conservation in Turkey. In: Zencirci N, Kaya Z, An-ikster Y, Adams WT, editors. The Proceeding of In-ternational Symposium on In situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Diversity, 4-8 November 1996; An-talya, Turkey. pp. 5-16.
Taşkoparan H, Karakaya A (2009). Assessment of the seedling reactions of some barley cultivars to Drechslera teres f. maculata. Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi 23(50): 60-62.
Tekauz A (1985). A numerical scale to classify reactions of barley to Pyrenophora teres. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 7: 181 – 183.
Tekauz A (1990). Characterization and distribution of pathogenic variation in Pyrenophora teres f. teres and Pyrenophora teres f. maculata from Western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 12: 141-148.
Yalçın E, Çelik S, Akar T, Sayim İ, Köksel H (2006). Kavuzsuz Arpanın Önemi, Beta- glukan ve Besin Lif içerigi. In: Hububat 2006, Hububat Ürünleri Tekno-lojisi Kongresi, 7-8 Eylül 2006; Gaziantep Üniversi-tesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Gıda Mühendisliği Bö-lümü. pp. 399-403.
Zadoks JC, Chang TT, Konzak CF (1974). A decimal code for the growths stages of cereals. Weed Re-search 14:41.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com