You are here

Home » Content

Kliniğimizde Gerçekleştirilen Histerektomi Olgularının Klinik ve Demografik Özelliklerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Evalation of the Clinical and Demographic Characteristics of the Hysterectomy Cases Performed in our Clinic

Journal Name:

  • Selçuk Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
To evaluate the hysterectomies carried out in our clinic for a period of two years. The study retrospectively evaluates the clinical and demographic characteristics of the 853 patients that had abdominal hysterectomy and vaginal hysterectomy procedures with various indications for the two years from January 2008 to December 2009 in Selcuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Gynecology and Obstetrics Department. In our clinic, the most common indication for hysterectomy was myoma uteri and the procedure was performed on 358 (41.9%) patients between the years 2008 and 2009. The second most common indication was gynecological malignancies and hysterectomy was performed on 161 (18.8%) patients. The ratio of abdominal hysterectomy (total and subtotal) was determined to be 93.6%, whereas the ratio of vaginal hysterectomy was 6.4%. As well as hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo ooforectomia (BSO) was also performed in 453 (53.1%) cases. We have seen 0.5% bladder injury, 0.37% ureter injury and 0.37% bowl injury in the abdominal hysterectomy group. In vaginal hysterectomy group, there was 1 case (1.85%) with bladder injury. With various indications such as myoma uteri, gynecological malignancy, uterovajinal prolapse, endometriosis and peripartum hemorrhage, hysterectomy is the most commonly performed operation by gynecologists. Although, the relative advantages and disadvantages of the abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomy types are known, abdominal hysterectomy is still the most common procedure in our clinic.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kliniğimizde 2 yıllık süre içerisinde uygulanan histerektomilerin değerlendirilmesini amaçladık. Çalışmamızda Ocak 2008-Aralık 2009 arasındaki 2 yıl içerisinde Selçuk Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Anabilim Dalı’nda çeşitli endikasyonlarla abdominal histerektomi ve vajinal histerektomi işlemleri uygulanan toplam 853 hastanın klinik ve demografik özellikleri retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Kliniğimizde en sık histerektomi, myoma uteri endikasyonu ile gerçekleştirilmiş olup 2008-2009 yılları arasında 358 (%41.9) hastaya uygulanmıştır. İkinci en sık histerektomi endikasyonumuz jinekolojik maligniteler olup 161 (%18.8) hastaya uygulanmıştır. Kliniğimizde abdominal histerektomi (total ve subtotal) oranı %93.6 iken vajinal histerektomi oranımız %6.4 olarak saptanmıştır. Vakaların 453’ünde (%53.1) histerektominin yanı sıra bilateral salpingoooferektomi (BSO) uygulanmıştı. Abdominal histerektomi gurubunda %0.5 mesane yaralanması, %0.37 üreter yaralanması ve %0.37 barsak yaralanması görüldü. Vajinal histerektomi gurubunda 1 (%1.85) hastada mesane yaralanması oluştuğu görülmüştür. Histerektomi, myoma uteri, jinekolojik maligniteler, uterovajinal prolapsus, endometriozis ve peripartum kanama gibi çeşitli endikasyonlar nedeniyle jinekologlar tarafından en sık uygulanan operasyondur. Abdominal, vajinal ve laparoskopik histerektomi tiplerinin birbirlerine olan avantajları ve dezavantajları bilinmekle birlikte halen kliniğimizde abdominal histerektomi daha sık olarak uygulanmaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-klinigimizde-gerceklestirilen-histerektomi-olgularinin-klinik-demografik-ozelliklerinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 1
19-22
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1- Davies A, Magos A. Indications and alternatives to
hysterectomy. Bailliere’s Clin Obstet and Gynaecol 1997;11:
64-7.
2- Lynne SW, Lisa MK, Robert P, et al; Hysterectomy in the United
States, 1988-1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:549-55.
3- Sonja, Sandberg I, Benjamin A, et al.Elective Hysterectomy.
Medical Care1985;23:1067-85.
4- Ferrari MM, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, et al. Identifying the
indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy:
a prospective, randomised comparison with abdominal
hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids.
British J Obstet Gynaecol 2000;107:620-5
5- Reich H, De Caprio J, Mc Klynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectımy.
J Gynaecol Surg 1989;5:909-10.
6- Precis IV An update in obstetrics and gynecology Washington
DC; ACOG 1989
7- Raju KS, Auld BJ. A randomised prospective study of
laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal
hysterectomy with bilateral salpingoooferectomy. Br J Obstet
Gynecol 1994;101:068-71.
8- Vessey PM, Klim P, Angela C, et al. The epidemiology of
hysterectomy: findings in a large cohort study. British J Obstet
Gynecol 1992;99:402-7
9- Maresh, MJA, Metcalfe MA, McPherson, et al. The value
national hysterectomy study: Description of the patients and
their surgery. Obstetrical Gynecological Survey 2002;57:431-2
10- Kovac SR, Borhon S, Lister M, et al. Das; Guidelines for the
selection route of hysterectomy: Application in a resident clinic
population. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:1521-7.
11- Kovac SR: Vaginal Hysterectomy Baillieres Clin obstet
Gynaecol 1997;11:95-110
12- Bottle A, Aylin P. Variations in vaginal and abdominal
hysterectomy by region and trust in England. BJOG 2005;112:
326-8.
13- Kovac SR. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar
indications. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:787-93.
14- Johnson NJ, Lethaby AL, Tavender E, et al. Methods of
hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of
randomised controlled trials. British Med J 2007;1-8.
15- Darai E, Soriano D, Kimata P et al. Vaginal Hysterectomy
for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance
Obstetrics Gynecology 2001;97:712-6
16- Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, et al. Total laparoscopic
hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an
assesment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized
study. Human Reprod 1999;14:2996-9.
17- Oscarsson U, Poromaa IS, Nüssler E, et al. No difference in
lenght of hospital stay vetween laparoscopic and abdominal
supraginal hsterectomy-a preliminary study. Acta Obstet
Gynaecol 2006;85:682-7.
18- Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, et al. Abdominal or vaginal
hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am
J Obstet Gynecol 2002,187:1561-5

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com