You are here

Home » Content

Adneksiyal Torsiyon Nedeniyle Opere Edilen Hastalarda Laparoskopi ve Laparotominin Karşılaştırılması

Comparison of Laparoscopy Versus Laparotomy in the Management of Adnexal Torsion

Journal Name:

  • Selçuk Tıp Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopy to laparotomy in the management of patients with suspected adnexal torsion. Seventy two patients with initial diagnosis of adnexal torsion that presented to our clinic with acute abdomen or were referred from other centers between January 2007 and December 2009 were included in this retrospective analysis. Data regarding age, gravidity, parity, size of adnexal mass, pre-operative and post-operative hemoglobin values, operation time and duration of hospitalization of patients that had adnexal detorsion, cystectomy, oopherectomy, total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oopherectomy (TAH-BSO) performed via laparoscopy or laparotomy were recorded. Twenty eight patients were treated laparoscopically while 44 patients had laparotomy. In the laparoscopy group 6 cases had detorsion, 17 had detorsion and cystectomy and 5 cases had salpingo-oopherectomy. In the laparotomy group 3 had detorsion, 17 had detorsion and cystectomy, 7 had salpingo-oopherectomy and 17 patients had TAHBSO. Laparoscopy group consisted of young patients with low parity, operation time was shorter in laparoscopy group and the patients were discharged more rapidly. Average adnexal mass size was bigger in laparotomy group. Adnexal torsion is one of gynecological emergency that require urgent operation the most appropriate surgical approach is laparoscopy especially in patients who want to preserve their fertility.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada amacımız, kliniğimizde adneksiyal torsiyon ön tanısı ile laparoskopi veya laparotomi yapılan hastaların değerlendirilmesi ve her iki operasyon yönteminin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Ocak 2007 ile Aralık 2009 yılları arasında, karın veya kasık ağrısı nedeniyle acil servise başvuran, akut karın bulguları olan hastalar ile diğer hastanelerden adneksiyal torsiyon ön tanısı ile kliniğimize sevk edilen ve değerlendirme neticesinde adneksiyal torsiyon ön tanısıyla operasyona alınan 72 hasta retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Laparoskopi veya laparotomi ile adneksiyal detorsiyon, kistektomi, ooferektomi, total abdominal histerektomi ve bilateral salpingoooferektomi (TAH-BSO) yapılan hastaların yaşları, gebelik ve doğum sayıları, adneksiyal kitle boyutu, pre-operatif ve postoperatif hemoglobin (Hb) değerleri, operasyon ve hospitalizasyon süreleri karşılaştırıldı. Laparoskopik yaklaşım ile 28, laparotomi ile 44 hasta opere edildi. Laparoskopik olarak 6 olguya detorsiyon, 17 olguya detorsiyon ve kistektomi ve 5 olguya da salpingo-ooferktomi yapılmıştır. Laparotomi grubunda ise 3 hastaya detorsiyon, 17 hastaya detorsiyon ve kistektomi, 7 hastaya salpingo-ooferektomi ve 17 hastaya da TAH-BSO uygulanmıştır. Laparoskopi grubu genç ve paritesi düşük olan hastalardan oluşmaktaydı. Operasyon süresi laparoskopi grubunda daha kısa idi ve daha kısa sürede taburcu edilmişlerdi. Ortalama adneksiyal kitle çapları laparotomi grubunda daha büyüktü. Adneksiyal torsiyon jinekolojik aciller içinde geç kalınmadan müdahale edilmesi gereken önemli bir klinik durumdur. Özellikle fertilite isteği olan hastalarda en uygun cerrahi yaklaşım laparoskopi ve organ koruyucu cerrahi yapılmasıdır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-adneksiyal-torsiyon-nedeniyle-opere-edilen-hastalarda-laparoskopi-laparotominin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 4
121-123
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Houry D, Abbott JT. Ovarian torsion: a fifteen-year review. Ann
Emerg Med. 2001;38:156-9.
2. Comerci JT Jr, Licciardi F, Bergh PA, et al. Mature cystic
teratoma: a clinicopathologic evaluation of 517 cases and
review of the literature. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:22-8.
3. Cass DL. Ovarian torsion. Semin Pediatr Surg 2005;14:86-92.
4. Cohen SB, Oelsner G, Seidman DS, Admon D, Mashiach S,
Goldenberg M. Laparoscopic detorsion allows sparing of
the twisted ischemic adnexa. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc
1999;6:139-43.
5. White M, Stella J. Ovarian torsion: 10-year perspective. Emerg
Med Australas. 2005;17:231-7.
6. Lee EJ, Kwon HC, Joo HJ, Suh JH, Fleischer AC. Diagnosis
of ovarian torsion with color Doppler sonography: depiction of
twisted vascular pedicle. J Ultrasound Med 1998;17:83-9.
7. Graif M, Itzchak Y. Sonographic evaluation of ovarian
torsion in childhood and adolescence. AJR Am J Roentgenol
1988;150:647-9.
8. Bayer AI, Wiskind AK. Adnexal torsion: can the adnexa be
saved? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1994;171:1506-10; discussion
1510-1.
9. Cohen SB, Wattiez A, Seidman DS, Goldenberg M, Admon D,
Mashiach S, et al. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for detorsion
and sparing of twisted ischemic adnexa. JSLS 2003;7:295-9.
10. Lo LM, Chang SD, Horng SG, Yang TY, Lee CL, Liang CC.
Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for surgical intervention of
ovarian torsion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008;34:1020-5.
11. Oelsner G, Cohen SB, Soriano D et al. Minimal surgery for
thetwisted ischemic adnexa can preserve ovarian function.
Hum Reprod 2003;18:2599-602.
12. Houry D, Abbott JT. Ovarian torsion: a fifteen-year review. Ann
Emerg Med 2001;38:156-9.
13. Argenta PA, Yeagley TJ, Ott G et al. Torsion of the uterine
adnexa: Pathologic correlations and current management
trends. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2001;56:84-5.
14. Ogburn T, Wurzel J, Espey E, Espey D. Adnexal torsion.
Experience at a single university center. J Reprod Med
2005;50:591-4.
15. McGovern PG, Noah R, Koenigsberg R et al. Adnexal torsion
and pulmonary embolism: case report and review of the
literature. Obstet Gynecol Surv 1999;54:601-8.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com