You are here

Home » Content

ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ ÇOK KATMANLI OKURYAZARLIK DÜZEYLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

INVESTIGATION OF MULTIMODAL LITERACY LEVELS OF PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Studies

Publication Year:

  • 2017
DOI: 
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.12303

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Today, besides printed books, individuals interact with existing materials in virtual world such as e-book, interactive book, video, facebook, twitter. In this process, it confronts with multimodal texts including written, visual, auditory, spatial elements and creates meaning and expresses itself by using these elements. It has become very important for us to acquire multimodal literacy skills in our time. In this research, multimodal literacy of pre-service teachers in terms of variables of gender, grade level, mother’s educational background, father’s educational background and daily internet usage time were examined. The sample of the research is composed of 345 pre-service teachers who are studying at the 1st, 2nd, 3th and 4th classes of elementary and Turkish teacher department studies teaching state university faculty of education. The multimodal literacy of pre-service teachers are assessed through the Multimodal Literacy Scale developed by Bulut, Ulu and Kan (2015). To analyze data, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis H-test was used. As a result of Mann Whitney U-test, a significant difference was defined in multimodal literay level pressing oneself using multimodal structure according to gender. As a result of Kruskal Wallis H-test a significant difference was defined in multimodal literacy level and interpretation of the contents presented in multimodal structure and preferring multimodal structures sub-dimensions according to grade level, mother’s and father’s educational background, in multimodal literay level and pressing oneself using multimodal structure according to daily internet usage time. Some suggestions have been made in the direction of the research results.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Günümüzde bireyler basılı kitapların yanında e-kitap, etkileşimli kitap, video, facebook, twitter gibi sanal âlemde mevcut materyallerle etkileşim içerisindedir. Bu süreçte yazılı, görsel, işitsel, mekânsal unsurları içeren çok katmanlı metinlerle karşı karşıya kalarak anlam oluşturmakta ve bu unsurları kullanarak kendini ifade etmektedir. Çağımızda çok katmanlı okuryazarlık becerisinin kazandırılması oldukça önemli hale gelmiştir. Bu araştırmanın amacı öğretmen adaylarının çok katmanlı okuryazarlık düzeylerini cinsiyet, sınıf düzeyi, anne eğitim durumu, baba eğitim durumu ve günlük internet kullanım süresine göre incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini bir devlet üniversitesinin sınıf ve Türkçe öğretmenliği bölümünde öğrenim gören 345 bir, iki, üç ve dördüncü sınıf öğrencileri oluşturmaktadır. Öğretmen adaylarının çok katmanlı okuryazarlık düzeylerini belirlemek için Bulut, Ulu ve Kan (2015) tarafından geliştirilen “Çok Katmanlı Okuryazarlık Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde Mann Whitney U ve Kruskal Wallis H-testi kullanılmıştır. Yapılan Mann Whitney U-testi sonucunda öğretmen adaylarının çok katmanlı okuryazarlık düzeyinde cinsiyete göre çok katmanlı yapıyı kullanarak kendini ifade etme boyutunda anlamlı farka rastlanmıştır. Kruskal Wallis H-testi sonucunda ise sınıf düzeyi, anne ve baba eğitim durumuna göre çok katmanlı yapıda kullanılan içeriği anlamlandırma ve çok katmanlı yapıyı tercih etme alt boyutlarında, günlük internet kullanım süresine göre çok katmanlı yapıyı kullanarak kendini ifade etme boyutunda anlamlı bir fark belirlenmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları doğrultusunda bazı önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-ogretmen-adaylarinin-cok-katmanli-okuryazarlik-duzeylerinin-incelenmesi.pdf
  • 25
763
778
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Ajayi, L. (2015). Innovative approaches in English-language arts: How two teachers teach high
school students to use multimodal resources for interpretation of Romeo and Juliet and
Macbeth. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 16(1), 65-106.
Akaslan, D. & Kul, Ü. (2017). Are pre-service teachers ready for e-learning? A case of Artvin Coruh
University. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and
History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 12/11 Spring 2017, p. 1-20, ISSN: 1308-2140,
www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number: http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.11825,
ANKARA-TURKEY.
Albawardi, A. (2017). Digital literacy practices of female Saudi University students: Insights from
electronic literacy logs. Language Studies Working Papers, 8, 12-22.
Alyousef, H. (2014). Investigating international postgraduate Business students’ multimodal literacy
and numeracy practices: A multidimensional appraoch. Doctoral thesis, University of
Adelaide, Adealide.
Anita, A. (2017). Visual imagery, metadata, and multimodal literacies across the curriculum. USA:
IGI Global.
Anstey, M. & Bull, G. (2010). Helping teachers to explore multimodal texts. An Electronic Journal
for Leaders in Education, 8(16). Retrieved from http://www.curriculum.
edu.au/leader/helping_teachers_to_explore_ multimodal_texts,31522.html?issueID= 12141.
Ata, R. & Yıldırım, K. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının medya okuryazarlığı dersi kapsamında internet
ve sosyal medya kullanımları. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(2), 581-602.
Baki, Y. & Türk, A. (2017). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının dijital pedagojik yeterliliklerinin çeşitli
değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the
Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 12/11 Spring 2017, p. 37-
58, ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.11769, ANKARA-TURKEY.
Bomphray, A. (2013). Considering primary-aged English-language learners' peripherality and
legitimacy in multimodal literacy lessons. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Victoria
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Canada.
Bourelle, T., Bourelle, A., Spong, S. & Hendrickson, B. (2017). Assessing multimodal literacy in
the online technical communication classroom. Journal of Business and Technical
Communication, 31(2), 222-255.
Bulut, B., Ulu, H. & Kan, A. (2015). Multimodal literacy scale: A study of validity and reliability.
Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 61, 45-60.
Chang, S. L., Shieh, R. S., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yu, P. T. (2012). Factors influencing women's attitudes
towards computers in a computer literacy training program. Turkish Online Journal of
Educational Technology-TOJET, 11(4), 177-187.
Connors, S.P. (2012). Weaving multimodal meaning in a graphic novel reading group. Visual
Communication, 12(1), 27-53.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures.
South Yarra: Macmillan.
Öğretmen Adaylarının Çok Katmanlı Okuryazarlık Düzeylerinin İncelenmesi 777
Turkish Studies
International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 12/25
Edwards-Groves, C. (2012). Interactive creative technologies: Changing learning practices and
pedagogies in the writing classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy,
The, 35(1), 99-113.
Ekşi, G., & Yılmaz Yakışık, B. (2015). An investigation of prospective English language teachers’
multimodal literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 464-471.
Halmatov, M., Okur Akçay, N. & Ekin S. (2017). Teknolojik araçların sınıfta kullanımına ilişkin
okul öncesi öğretmenlerinin görüşleri. Turkish Studies - International Periodical for the
Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic Volume 12/11 Spring 2017, p. 1-20,
ISSN: 1308-2140, www.turkishstudies.net, DOI Number:
http://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.11892, ANKARA-TURKEY.
Hammond, H. K. (2009). Graphic novels and multimodal literacy: A reader response study. Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Minnesota The Faculty of the Graduate School, Minnesota.
Hassett, D. D., & Curwood, J. S. (2009). Theories and practices of multimodal education: The
instructional dynamics of picture books and primary classrooms. The Reading
Teacher, 63(4), 270-282.
Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları.
Kist, W. (2000). Beginning to create the new literacy classroom: What does the new literacy look
like? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 43(8), 710-718.
Krause, M.B. (2015). Facilitating a transdisciplinary approach in teacher education through
multimodal literacy and cognitive neuroscience. Doctoral Dissertation, University of South
Florida Degree Granting Department, Florida.
Kurudayıoğlu, M. & Tüzel, S. (2010). 21. yüzyıl okuryazarlık türleri, değişen metin algısı ve Türkçe
eğitimi. TÜBAR-XXVIII, 283-298.
López Bustos, D. (2015). Exploring pre-service EFL teachers' multimodal literacy practices:
Implications for teacher education. Master Thesis, Distrital Francisco José de Caldas
University Linguistics to the Teaching of English, Francisco.
Peterson, C., Caverly, D.C. & MacDonald, L. (2003). Techtalk: Developing academic literacy
through WebQuests. Journal of Development Education, 26(3), 38-39.
Sewell, W. C., & Denton, S. (2011). Multimodal literacies in the secondary English
classroom. English Journal, 100(5), 61-65.
Siegel, M. (2006). Rereading the signs: Multimodal transformations in the field of literacy
education. Language Arts, 84(1), 65-77.
Souzandehfar, M., Saadat, M., & Sahragard, R. (2014). The significance of
multimodality/multiliteracies in Iranian EFL learners’ meaning-making process. Iranian
Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 115-143.
Takaki, N. H. (2010). Experimenting with multimodal literacy at university: Interpreting the film
Eyes Wide Shut. Critical Literacy: Theories & Practices, 4(2), 54-63.
Underwood, J.D.M. (2007). Rethinking the digital divide: Impacts on studenttutor relationships.
European Journal of Education, 42(2), 213-222.
778 Hacer ULU - Ayşegül AVŞAR TUNCAY
Turkish Studies
International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic
Volume 12/25
Ünlüsoy, A., de Haan, M., Leseman, P. M., & van Kruistum, C. (2010). Gender differences in
adolescents’ out-of-school literacy practices: A multifaceted approach. Computers &
Education, 55(2), 742-751.
Vaish, V. & Towndrow, P.A. (2010). Multimodal literacy in language classrooms. In N. H.
Hornberger & S.L. McKay (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp.317-345).
Multilingual Matters.
Walsh, M. (2006). Reading visual and multimodal texts: How is ‘reading’ different? Australian
Journal of Language and Literacy, 29(1), 24-37.
Wohlwend, K. E. (2009). Mapping multimodal literacy practices through mediated discourse
analysis: Identity revision in “What Not To Wear”. In K. M. Leander, D. W. Rowe, R.
Jimenez, D. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, Y. Kim & V. Risko (Eds.), Fifty-eighth yearbook of
the national reading conference (pp. 66-81). San Antonio, TX: National Reading
Conference.
Tüzel, S. (2013). Çok katmanlı okuryazarlık öğretimine ilişkin Türkçe öğretmen adaylarının
görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 9(2), 133-151.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin
Yayıncılık.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com