You are here

AMELİYAT İPLİKLERİ TİPLERİ ÖZELLİKLERİ VE KROME KATGÜT İLE NORMAL KATGÜT ARASINDAKİ MUKAVEMET FARKLARI

Types and Properties of Suture Materials and Strength Differences Between Normal and Cromium Catgut

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the some properties of absorbable and non-absorbable sutures have been reviewed. In addition, the knot strength differences between normal cat-cut and chromium cat-cut in respect to suture number have been investigated.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, ameliyat iplikleri hakkında kısa genel bilgi verilmiştir Bunun dışında, absorbe olan ameliyat ipliklerinden; Normal ve Krome Katgüt, Poliglaktin (Poliglaktik Asit), Poliglokolik Asit (PGA), Polidioksanon, Polimetilen Karbonat, Poliglekapron 25 ile absorbe olmayan ameliyat ipliklerinden; İpek, Poliamid, Polipropilen, Poliester, Poliester esaslılar hakkında bilgi verilmiş ve Normal Katgüt ile Krome Katgüt arasındaki mukavemet farkları incelenmiştir.
95-105

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Anonim. (1988a) Cerrahi İpek İplik Türk Standartları Enstitüsü (TSE), TS 5505, Ankara.
2. Anonim. (1988b) Cerrahi Poliamid İplik. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü (TSE), TS 5504, Ankara.
3. Anonim. (1988c) Cerrahi Poliester İplik. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü (TSE), TS 5503, Ankara.
4. Anonim. (1994a) Wound Closure Manuel, Ethicon Inc.
5. Anonim. (1994b) Ürün Katalogu, United States Surgical Corporation (US Surgery Gynecology & Obstetric).
6. Anonim. (1995) Sutur İğnelerinin Kullanılması ve Tutulması, Sutur Kullanım Rehberi, Ethicon Inc.
7. Artandi, CA. (1980) A Revolution In Sutures.. Surg Gynecol Obstet; 150: 235-236.
8. Babetty, ZA. (1998) The Mechanical And Biological Performance Of The Asiternating Sliding Knots With Different
Patterns İn Abdominal Wound Close. Ph.D. Thesis (Unpuplished), Boğaziçi Üniversitesi.
9. Brennan, KW, (1991). Braided Surgical Sutures. Ethicon Inc.
10. Browning, A., (1984), Annealing and Its Effect on the Hydrolytic Degradation of Poly(glycolic Acid) Absorbable
Sutures in Vitro, Master Thesis, The Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University.
11. Brunius, U, Zederfeldt B, (1970), Suture Materials in General Surgery. A Comment Prog Surg.; 8:38-44
12. Capperauld I, (1989), Suture Materials: A Review, Clinical Materials, V 4, N 1, pp.3-12.
13. Chu, CC, (1981), Mechanical Properties Of Suture Materials. Annals Of Surgery. 193(3):365-371
14. Demirhan EA. (1995), Lectures On Medical History And Medical Ethics. Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri Ltd. Şti.
15. Engin, A. (1993), Yara İyileşmesi. İ.Sayek (Editor), Temel Cerrahi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
16. Herrmann JB, (1971), Tensile strength and knot security of surgical suture materials., American Surgery. Apr; V
37 N 4 pp 209-17.
17. Magilligan DJ ve DeWeese JA, (1974), Knot security and Synthetic Suture Materials,The American Journal of
Surgery, V 127, N 3, pp 355-358.
18. Mazzarese, PM, Faulkner, BC, Gear AJL, Watkins FH, Rodeheaver GT ve Edlich RF, (1997), Technical Consideration
in Knot Construction, Part II. Interreupted Dermal Suture Closure, The Journal of Emergeny Medicine, V
15 N 4 pp 505-511.
19. Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW. (1992), A Review Of Sutures And Suturing Techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol.
Sep;18(9):785-95
20. Mukherjee, DP: (1989), A Review on Sutures. Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Engineering, Vol. 16, 2nd
Edition, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 473-487.
21. Paez JM, Herrero EJ, Martin AC, Sestafe JV, Tellez G, Millan I, Salvador J, Cordon A, Castillo-Olivares JL.
(2000), The influence of chemical treatment and suture on the elastic behavior of calf pericardium utilized in the
construction of cardiac bioprostheses, J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2000 May;11(5):273-7.
22. Ivy, JJ, Unger JB, Hurt J ve Mukherjee D, (2004),The effect of number of throws on knot security with nonidentical
sliding knots, American Journal of Obsterics and Gynecology, V 191, pp 1618-1620,
23. Salano JM, Hoge DO, Bourne WM, (2003), Keratometric astigmatism after sutur removal in penatraing kertoplasty:
double running versus single running suture techniques, Cornea, V 22 pp. 716-720.
24. Tatlıkazan, L., (1991), Sıçanlarda Kromik Katgüt, İpek, Polyglactin 910 ve Polydioxanone ile Yapılan Kolon
Anastomozlarının Histopatolojik Karşılaştırılması, Uzmanlık Tezi, U.Ü. Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi
Anabilimdalım
25. Thacker, JG, Rodeheaver G, Moore JW, Kauzlarich JJ, Kurtz L, Edgerton MT ve Edlich RF, (1975), The American
Journal of Surgery, V 130, N 3, pp 374-380.
26. Tomita N, Tamai S, Morihara T, Ikeuchi K, Ikada Y., (1993), Handling characteristics of braided suture materials
for tight tying., J Appl Biomater. 1993 Spring;4(1):61-5.
27. Ulcay, Y ve Karaca, E. (1993a), Ameliyat İpliklerinin Gelişimi, Hammaddeleri ve Özellikleri, Tekstil & Teknik, V
9, No:106, pp. 101-106.
28. Ulcay, Y ve Karaca, E. (1993b), Ameliyat İpliklerinin Kullanım Özellikleri, Tekstil & Teknik, V 9, No:107, pp.
104-107.
29. Van Winkle W Jr, Hastings JC, (1972), Considerations in the choice of suture material for various tissues, Surg
Gynecol Obstet. Jul;135(1):pp. 113-26.
30. Yee, J.L., (1985), Annealing And Its Effect On The Hydrolytic Degradation Of Poly Absorbable Sutures İn Vitro.
M.Sc. Thesis, Cornell University.
31. Zimmer CA, Edlich RF, (1991), Influence of Knot Configuration and Tying Technique on the Mechanical Performance
of Sutures, Journal of Emergency Medicine, V 9, pp 107-113.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com