Argün, Z. (2008). Lise Matematik Öğretmenlerin Yetiştirilmesinde Mevcut Yargılar, Yeni Fikirler.
Türk Bilim Araştırmaları Vakfı Dergisi, 1(2), 89–95.
Ayas, A. (2009). Öğretmenlik Mesleğinin Önemi ve Öğretmen Yetiştirmede Güncel Sorunlar. İnönü
Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(3), 1–11.
Ball, D.L. (1988). Knowledge and reasoning in mathematical pedagogy: Examining what
prospective teachers bring to teacher education. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Michigan
State University, East Lansing, MI.
Ball, D.L. (1990a). Examining the subject matter knowledge of prospective mathematics teachers’.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 132–143.
Ball, D.L. (1990b). Prospective elementary and secondary teachers’ understanding of division.
Journal for Mathematics Education, 21, 132–144.
Ball, D. L. (1990c). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher
education. The Elementary School Journal, 90, 449–466.
Ball, D. L. (1991). Research on teaching mathematics: Making the subject matter knowledge part of
the equations. J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching, vol.2, (pp.1–48).
Greenwhich, CT: JAI Press.
Ball, D.L., & McDiarmid, G.W. (1990). The subject-matter preparation of teachers. Houston (Ed.),
Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (pp. 437–449). New York, NY: MacMillan.
Büyüköztürk,Ş. (2002). Faktör Analizi: Temel Kavramlar ve Ölçek Geliştirmede Kullanımı. Eğitim
Yönetimi Dergisi, 470–473.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Akgün, Ö. E., Kahveci, Ö. ve Demirel, F. (2004). Güdülenme ve Öğrenme
Stratejileri Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Kuram ve
Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 4(2), 210–239.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Peterson, P.L., & Carey, D. A. (1988). Teachers’ pedagogical content
knowledge of students’ problem solving in elementary artihmetic. Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, 19(5), 385–401.
Charalambos, C.Y., Philippou, G.N., & Kyriakides, L. (2008). Tracing the development of
preservice teachers’ efficacy belief in teaching mathematics during fieldwork. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 67, 125–142.
Cooney, T. J., & Wilson, M.R. (1993). Teachers’ Thinking about Functions: Historical and Research
Perspective. T. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. Carpenter (Eds.), Integrating research on the
graphical representation of functions (ss.131–158). Hilsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Dinç–Artut, P., & Bal, P. (2006). Eğitim Fakültesi Sınıf Öğretmenliği Matematik Ders
Programlarının Öğrenciler Açısından Değerlendirilmesi. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 25,
23–33.Enochs, L. G., and Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further development of an elementary science teaching
efficacy belief instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and
Mathematics, 90, 694–706.
Enochs, L., Smith, P. L., & Huinker, D. (2000). Establishing factorial validity of the mathematics
teaching
efficacy beliefs instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 100(4), 194–202.
Eroğlu, A. (2009). Faktör Analizi. Ş. Kalaycı (Ed.), SPSS Uygulamalı Çok Değişkenli İstatistik
Teknikleri (ss.321–331). Ankara: Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
Even, R. (1989). Prospective secondary teachers’ knowledge and understanding about mathematical
functions. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching and the case of functions. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 21, 521-554.
Even, R. (1993). Subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: prospective
secondary teachers and the functions concept. Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 24, 94–116.
Even, R. (1998). Factors involved in linking representations of functions. Journal of Mathematical
Behavior, 17, 105–121.
Even, R., & Tirosh, D. (1995). Subject-matter knowledge and knowledge about students as sources
of teacher presentations of the subject matter. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 1–
20.
Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2. baskı). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Publications, Inc.
Hill, H. C., Ball, D.L., & Schilling, S.G. (2008). Unpacking pedagocical content knowledge:
Conceptualizing and measuring teachers’ topic-specific knowledge of students. Journal for
Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400.
Hill, H.C., Blunck, M. L., Charalambous, C.Y., Lewis, J.M., Phelps, G. C., Sleep, L., & Ball, D.L.
(2008). Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical qualtity of instruction:
An exploratory study. Cognition and Instruction, 26(4), 430–511.
Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for
teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 371–406.
Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachers’ mathematics
knowledge for teaching. Elementary School Journal, 105, 11–30.
Hudson, P., & Ginns, I. (2007). Developing an instrument to examine preservice teachers’
pedagogical development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 885–899.
Hudson, P., & Skamp, K. (2003). Mentoring preservice teachers of primary science. The Electronic
Journal of Science Education, 7(1). (8 Kasım 2009).
http://unr.edu/homepage/jcannon/ejse/ejse.html
Kan, A. (2009). Ölçme Sonuçları Üzerinde İstatistiksel İşlemler H. Atılgan (Ed.), Eğitimde Ölçme ve
Değerlendirme (ss.397–456), Anı Yayıncılık: Ankara.
Karasar, N. (2003). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri (12. Baskı), Ankara: Nobel Yayınevi.
Koca–Özgün, A. S. (2002). Hizmet Öncesi Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Matematiğe Karşı Tutumları
ve Matematiğin Öğretilmesine ve Kendi Öğretmen Yetiştirme Programlarına İlişkin
İnançları Nelerdir? Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 118–125.
Maclellan, E. (2008). Pedagogical literacy: What it means and what it allows. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 24, 1986–1992.
Mewborn, D. (2001). Teachers content knowledge, teacher education, and their effects on the
preparation of elementary teachers in the United States. Matematics Education Research
Journal, 3, 28–36.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School
Mathematics: Reston, Va.: NCTM.Peard, R. F., & Hudson, P. B. (2006). Mentoring Pre-Service Elementary Teachers in Mathematics
Teaching. EDU-COM 2006 International Conference, Thailand, Nong Khai.
Sanchez, V., & Llinares, S. (2003). Four student teachers’ pedagogical reasoning on functions.
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6(5), 5-25.
Schram, P., Wilcox, S., Lainer, P., & Lappan, G. (1988). Changing mathematics conceptions of
preservice teachers: A content and pedagogical intervention. (Research Report No 88–4).
East Lansing, MI: NCRTL, Michigan State University.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational
Researcher, 15, 4-14.
Shulman, L. S. (2004). The wisdom of practice: essays on teaching, learning and learning to teach.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Soylu, Y., Işık, A., & Konyalıoğlu, C.A. (2004). Eğitim Fakülteleri Sınıf Öğretmenliği Programında
Okutulan Matematik Derslerinin İlköğretim Matematik Müfredatına Uygunluğu.
Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 12(1), 117–124.
Sümer, N. (2000). Yapısal Eşitlik Modelleri: Temel Kavramlar ve Örnek Uygulamalar. Türk
Psikoloji Yazıları, 3(6), 49–74.
Tschannen–Moran, M., & Woolfolk–Hoy, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive
construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783–805.
Turnuklu, E. B., & Yesildere, S. (2007). The pedagogical content knowledge in mathematics: Preservice
primary mathematics teachers’ perspectives in Turkey. Issues in the
Undergraduate Mathematics Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal (October
2007). [Online]: Retrieved on 12-February-2009, at URL: [www.k-12prep.math.ttu.edu]
Türnüklü, E.B. (2005). Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Pedagojik Alan Bilgileri ile Matematiksel
Alan Bilgileri Arasındaki İlişki. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21, 234–247.
Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). “150 ways of knowing”: Representations of
knowledge in teaching. Carlderhead (Ed.), Exploring Teacher Thinking (pp.104–124).
Sussex: Holt, Rinehart, & Wilson.
Yeşildere, S., & Akkoç, H. (2010). Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Sayı Örüntülerine İlişkin
Pedagojik Alan Bilgilerinin Konuya Özel Stratejiler Bağlamında İncelenmesi. Ondokuz
Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 125–149.
Yüksek Öğretim Kurulu. (2007). Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitim Fakülteleri (1982–2007). Ankara,
Temmuz.
Yılmaz, V. & Çelik, E. H. (2009). Lisrel ile Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi-I: Temel Kavramlar,
Uygulamalar, Programlama. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Yayıncılık.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
