You are here

Home » Content

Sanayi Sonrası Toplum Özelinde Türkiye’de Akade-mik ve Bilimsel Bilginin Gelişimine Giriş

Introduction to Development of Academic and Scientific Knowledge in Turkey in Specific to Post-Industrial Society

Journal Name:

  • OPUS-Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2016

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Daniel Bell’s study, The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, keeps many important aspects in terms of illustrating the major socio-economic parameters of 21st Cen-tury’s global societies. Post industrial society, which is basically shaped on the concept of “knowledge” and processes regarding knowledge, brings individual and his status in society to a more active position unlike previous social formations’ attempts on individual. This activation brings original social relationships in technology, science, and intellectual areas. Current study proposes to analyse the 10-15 year-period developments and new type of relationships in science, technology, and intellectual area in Turkey in specific to post industrial society. Within this purpose in mind, after highlighting the conceptual background, the application areas of post industrial society in Turkey such as TUBİTAK (official academic council), universities, thinking institutes, technology invest-ments, etc. will be explored. At the last part of the study, on the other hand, some of the discussions and critical readings on the applicability of the concept of post industrial society to Turkish society will be issued
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Daniel Bell’in Sanayi Sonrası Toplumun Gelişi adlı eseri, 21. Yüzyıl küresel toplumlarının sosyo-ekonomik tablosunu ortaya koymak açısından önemli veriler sunmaktadır. Temelde “bilgi” olgusu ve süreçleri özelinde şekillenen sanayi sonrası toplum, önceki toplumsal formasyonlardan farklı olarak bireyi ve onun toplum içindeki konumunu daha aktif bir pozisyona taşır. Bu aktif olma hali, teknolojide, bilimde ve entelektüel alanda yeni türden toplumsal ilişkileri de beraberinde getirir. Mevcut çalışma, sanayi sonrası toplum özelinde Türkiye’de son 10-15 yıllık süre içerisinde bilimde, teknolojide ve entelektüel alanda ortaya çıkan gelişmeleri ve yeni türden ilişkileri analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu sebeple, çalışma, ilgili kavramın teorik yansımalarına ışık tuttuktan sonra, sa-nayi sonrası toplumun Türkiye’de TÜBİTAK, üniversiteler, düşünce enstitüleri, teknoloji yatırımları vb. alanlardaki uygulamalarını ele alacaktır. Çalışmanın son bölümündeyse sanayi son-rası toplum kavramının Türkiye toplumuna uygulanabilirliğine dair bazı tartışalara ve eleştirel oku-malara yer verilecektir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-sanayi-sonrasi-toplum-ozelinde-turkiyede-akade-mik-bilimsel-bilginin-gelisimine-giris.pdf
  • 11
539
562
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Alkin, R. C. (2014). Introduction to the Relationship between Sociology and Modernity in Specific to Emile Durkheim and Max Weber’s Studies, European Scientific Journal, 10 (5), 1-11.
Bell, D. (1960). The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. Glencoe IL: Free Press.
Bell, D. (1999). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Reissue Edition, New York: Basic Books.
Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture, Vol: 1: The Rise of Network Society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Dahrendorf, R. (1959). Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Dalton, R. J. (2006). Social Modernization and the End of Ideology De-bate: Patterns of Ideological Polarization, Japanese Journal of Politi-cal Science, 7 (1), 1-22.
Durkheim, E. (1984). The Division of Labor in Society, Edited with an Intro-duction by Lewis Cosen, trans by: W. D. Halls, Basingstoke: Mac-millan Press.
Domondon, A. (2014). Assessing Bell’s Forecast: Big Science and the Post-Industrial Society. The International Journal of Science in Soci-ety, 4, 117-128.
Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth-Heine-mann Ltd.
Franzosi, R. (1995). The Puzzle of Strikes: Class and State Strategies in Post-war Italy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kumar, K. (1978). Prophecy and Progress: The Sociology of Industrial and Post-Industrial Society. Allen Lane: The Penguin Press.
Kumar, K. (2005). From Post-Industrial to Post-Modern Society: New Theories of the Contemporary World, 2nd Edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publish-ing.
Lyotard, J. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Min-nesota: The University of Minnesota Press
Marx, K. & Engels, F. (2007). The Communist Manifesto. Radford VA: Wil-der Publications.
Ruhi Can Alkın
OPUS © Uluslararası Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi  562
Piore, M. J. & Charles F. S. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide. New York: Basic Books
Ross, G. (1974). The Second Coming of Daniel Bell. Socialist Register, 11, 331-348.
Tecim, E. & Yardım, M. (2016) European Multiculturalism: Between Unity and Exclusion, Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, 5 (1), 12-19.
Watsons, M. (1996). Key Sociologists: Daniel Bell. London: Routledge.
Weber, M. (2001). Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Translated by Talcott Parsons, New York: Routledge.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com