Akkan, Y., Baki, A. ve Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2011). Aritmetik ile cebir arasındaki farklılıklar: Cebir öncesinin
önemi. İlköğretim Online, 10(3), 812-823.
Akkan, Y., Baki, A. ve Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2012). 5-8. Sınıf öğrencilerinin aritmetikten cebire geçiş problem
çözme bağlamında incelenmesi. Hacettepe Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 43, 1-13.
Bednarz, N. ve Janvier, B. (2001). Emergence and development of algebra as a problemsolving tool:
Continuities and discontinuities with arithmetic. In N. Bednarz, C. Kieran and L. Lee (Eds.),
Approaches to algebra: Perspectives for research and teaching (pp. 115–136). Dordrecht: Kluwer
Academic Publisher.
Cai, J. ve Knuth, E. (2011). Early algebraization: A global dialogue from multiple perspectives. New
York: Springer.
Cai, J., Ng, S. F. ve Moyer, J. C. (2011). Developing students’ algebraic thinking in earlier grades:
Lessons from China and Singapore. In J. Cai ve E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global
dialogue from multiple perspectives. (pp. 25-41). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics.
Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of
Chief State School Officers.
Day, R. ve Jones, G. A. (1997). Building bridges to algebraic thinking. Mathematics Teaching in the
Middle Schools, 2(4), 208-213.
Dede, Y. (2004). Öğrencilerin cebirsel sözel problemleri denklem olarak yazarken kullandıkları
çözüm stratejilerinin belirlenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama, 3, 175 -192.
Didiş, M. G. ve Erbaş, A. K. (2012). Lise öğrencilerinin cebirsel sözel problemleri çözmedeki başarısı.
X.Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi Bildiri Özetleri Kitabı, Nigde,
Turkey, Haziran 27-30, 2012 (p. 430): Nigde Üniversitesi, Türkiye.
Ellis, A. B. (2007). The influence of reasoning with emergent quantities on students’ generalizations.
Cognition and Instruction, 25(4), 439–478.
Yedinci Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Cebirsel Sözel Problemlerini Çözerken... 891
March 2016 Vol:24 No:2 Kastamonu Education Journal
Ellis, A. B. (2011). Algebra in the middle school: Developing functional relationships through quantitative
reasoning. In J. Cai ve E. Knuth (Eds.), Early algebraization: A global dialogue from
multiple perspectives. (pp. 215-238). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Fan, L. ve Zhu,Y. (2007). Representation of problem-solving procedures: A comparative look at China,
Singapore, and US mathematics textbooks. Education Studies Mathematics, 66(1), 61-75.
Harel, G. (2013). The Kaputian program and its relation to DNR-based instruction: A common commitment
to the development of mathematics with meaning, In M. Fried ve T. Dreyfus (Eds.),
The SimCalc vision and contribution (pp. 438-448). Springer.
Harel, G. ve Lim, K. H. (2004). Mathematics teachers’ knowledge base: Preliminary results. In M.
Hoines ve A. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group
for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3(3), pp. 25 – 32). Bergen, Norway.
Hattikudur, S., Prather, R. W., Asquith, P., Alibali, M. W., Knuth, E. J. ve Nathan, M. (2012). Constructing
graphical representations: Middle schoolers’ intuitions and developing knowledge about
slope and Y‐intercept. School Science and Mathematics, 112(4), 230-240.
Goldin, G. (2000). A scientific perspective on structures, task-based interviews in mathematics education
research. In A. E. Kelly ve R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics
and science education (pp. 517–545). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning
and Instruction, 7(4), 293-307.
Guberman, R. ve Leikin, R. (2013). Interesting and difficult mathematical problems: changing teachers’ views
by employing multiple-solution tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 16(1), 33-56.
Gürbüz, R. & Akkan, Y. (2008). Farklı öğrenim seviyesindeki öğrencilerin aritmetikten cebire geçiş
düzeylerinin karşılaştırılması: Denklem örneği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 33(148), 64-76.
Kabael, T. ve Kızıltoprak, F. (2014). Sixth grade students’ ways of thinking associated with solving
algebraic verbal problems. In S. Oesterle, C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl ve D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings
of the Joint Meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA 36 (Vol. 6, p. 120). Vancouver, Canada: PME.
Kaput, J. (1995). Long term algebra reform: Democratizing access to big ideas. In C. Lacampagne,
W. Blair ve J. Kaput (Eds.), The algebra initiative colloquium (pp. 33–52). Washington, DC:
U.S. Department of Education.
Kılıç, Ç. (2011). İlköğretim matematik öğretmen adaylarının standart olmayan sözel problemlere
verdikleri yanıtlar ve yorumlar. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,
12(3), 55-74.
Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of
research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390-419). New York: Macmillan.
Koichu, B. ve Harel, G. (2007). Triadic interaction in clinical task-based interviews with mathematics
teachers. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 65(3), 349-365.
Küchemann, D.E. (1981). Algebra. In K.M. Hart (Ed.), Children’s understanding of mathematics
(pp. 102-119). John Murray.
Mayer, R. E., Lewis, A. B. ve Hegarty, M. (1992). Mathematical misunderstandings: Qualitative
reasoning about quantitative problems. Advances in Psychology, 91, 137-153.
Moore, K. C. ve Carlson, M. P. (2012). Students’ images of problem contexts when solving applied
problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(1), 48-59.
Nathan, M. J. ve Young, E. (1990). Thinking situationally: Results with an unintelligent tutor for
word algebra problems. In A. McDougell ve C. Dowling (eds.), Computers and education (pp.
187-216). New York: North-Holland.
892 Tangül KABAEL, Ayça AKIN...
Mart 2016 Cilt:24 No:2 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
Leikin, R. (2011). Multiple-solution tasks: From a teacher education course to teacher practice.
ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(6), 993-1006.
Lesh, R. ve Zawojewski, J. S. (2007). Problem solving and modeling. In F. Lester (Ed.), The handbook of
research on mathematics teaching and learning (2nd ed., pp. 763–804). Reston, VA: National Council
of Teachers of Mathematics; Charlotte, NC: InformationA ge Publishing. (Joint Publication).
Moore, K. C. (2010). Relationships between quantitative reasoning and students’ problem solving
behaviors. Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate
Mathematics Education (pp. 298-313). Portland, OR: Portland State University.
Moore, K. C., Carlson, M. P. ve Oehrtman, M. (2009). The role of quantitative reasoning in solving
applied precalculus problems. Paper presented at the Twelfth Annual Special Interest Group of
the Mathematical Association of America on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education
(SIGMAA on RUME) Conference, Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University.
Olive, J. ve Çağlayan, G. (2008). Learners’ difficulties with quantitative units in algebraic word
problems and the teacher’s interpretation of those difficulties. International Journal of Science
and Mathematics Education, 6(2), 269-292.
Palomares, J. C. A. ve Hernandez, J. G. (2002). Identification of strategies used by fifth graders to
solve mathematics word problems. In D. Mewborn, P. Sztajn, D. White, H. Wiegel, R. Bryant
ve K. Nooney (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Meeting of the North American
Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3,
p.1379). Athens, Georgia State University.
Pólya, G. (1957). How to solve it. Princeton. New Jersey: Princeton University.
Reusser, K., ve Stebler, R. (1997). Every word problem has a solution – The social rationality of
mathematical modeling in schools. Learning and Instruction, 7, 309-327
Schoenfeld, A.H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press.
Smith, J. ve Thompson, P. (2007). Quantitative reasoning and the development of algebraic reasoning.
In J. Kaput ve D. Carraher (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 95-132). New York, NY:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stacey, K. ve MacGregor, M. (1999). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems. The
Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 149-167.
Thompson, P. (1988). Quantitative concepts as a foundation for algebraic reasoning: Sufficiency,
necessity, and cognitive obstacles. In M. Behr, C. Lacampagne ve M. Wheeler (1988) (Eds.),
Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics
Education (pp. 163-170). Dekalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
Thompson, P. (1989). A cognitive model of quantity-based algebraic reasoning. Paper presented at
the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, USA.
Thompson, P. W. (1993). Quantitative reasoning, complexity, and additive structures. Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 25(3), 165-208.
Van Dooren, W., Verschaffel, L ve Onghena, P. (2003). Pre-service teachers’ preferred strategies for solving
arithmetic and algebraic word problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 27-52.
Yıldırım, A., ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (genişletilmiş 5.
Baskı), Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
