Interactive Whiteboards in Mathematics Spaces: An Examination of Technology Integration in an Urban Middle School

Al-Onizat, S. H. (2016). Measurement of multiple intelligences among sample of students with
autism, and intellectual disability using teacher estimation and its relationship with the
variables: The type and severity of disability, gender, age, type of center. International
Journal of Education, 8(1), 107-129.
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIOANL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 8(4), 303-318
314
Al-Zaidiyeen, N., Lai, M., & Fong-Soon, F. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology
use in classrooms: The case of Jordan Schools. International Education Studies, 3, 211-
218.
Armstrong, V., Barnes, S., Sutherland, R., Curran, S., Mills, S., & Thompson, I. (2005).
Collaborative research methodology for investigating teaching and learning: The use of
the interactive whiteboard technology. Educational Review, 57(4), 457-469.
Bates, A. W. & Poole, G. (2003). Effective teaching with technology in higher education:
Foundations for success. Indianapolis, IN: Jossey-Bass.
Beauchamp, G. & Kennewell, S. (2010). Interactivity in the classroom and its impact on
learning. Computers & Education, 54(3), 759-766. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.03
Beauchamp, G. & Kennewell, S. (2013). Transition in pedagogical orchestration using the
interactive whiteboard. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 179-191.
Becker, H. J. (2001). How are teachers using computers in instruction? Retrieved on 3
September 2017 from www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/FINDINGS/special3/
Beeland, W. D. (2002, April). Student engagement, visual learning and technology: Can
interactive whiteboards help? Paper presented at the annual conference of the
Association of Information Technology for Teaching Education. Trinity College, Dublin,
Ireland.
Bell, M. A. (2002). Why use an interactive whiteboard? A baker’s dozen reasons! Retrieved on
3 September 2017 from http://teachers.net/gazette/JAN02
Brandt, R. (1995). Future shock is here. Educational Leadership, 53(2), 5-13.
Bunce, D. M., Flens, E. A., & Neiles, K. Y. (2010). How long can students pay attention in class?
A study of student attention decline using clickers. Journal of Chemical Education, 87,
1438-1443. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ed100409p
Chen, H.R., Chiang, C.H & Lin, W.S. (2013). Learning effects of interactive whiteboard pedagogy
for students in Taiwan from the perspective of multiple intelligences. Journal of
Educational Computing Research, 49(2), 173-187.
Cheung, A. C. & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology applications affect
student reading outcomes: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 198-215.
Cheung, A. C. & Slavin, R. E. (2013). The effectiveness of educational technology applications
for enhancing mathematics achievement in K-12 classrooms: a meta-analysis.
Educational Research Review, 9, 88-113
Dattalo, P. (2010). Strategies to approximate random sampling and assessment. New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Demonte, T. (2013).Interactive whiteboards in the elementary classroom. International Society
for Technology in Education. Retrieved on 3 September 2017 from http://www.iste.org/
docs/excerpts/IBOARD-excerpt.pdf
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better
conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M., Yoon, K. S., & Birman, B. (2002). Does professional
development change teachers’ instruction? Results from a three-year study. Educational
Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(2), 81-112.
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIOANL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 8(4), 303-318
315
Digregorio, P. & Sobel-lojeski, K. (2010). The effects of interactive whiteboards (IWB) on
student performance and learning: A literature review. Journal of Educational
Technology Systems, 38, 255-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.2190/ET.38.3.b
Drijvers, P. (2013). Digital technology in mathematics education: Why it works (or doesn’t).
PNA, 8(1), 1-20.
Erdogan, M., Kursun, E., Susman, G., Saltan, F., Gok, A., & Yildiz, I. (2010). A qualitative study
on classroom management and classroom discipline problems, reasons, and solutions: A
case of information technologies class. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 10, 881-
891.
Gardner, H. (2001). Creators: multiple intelligences. In K. H. Pfenninger and V. R. Shubik (Eds.),
The origins of creativity (pp. 117–144). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Glover, D., Miller, D., Averis, D., & Door, V. (2007). The evolution of an effective pedagogy for
teachers using the interactive whiteboard in mathematics and modern languages: An
empirical analysis from the secondary sector. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 5-
20.
Goodnow J. & Collins W. (1990). Development according to parents: The nature, sources and
consequences of parents’ ideas. London: Erlbaum.
Grady, M., Watkins, S., & Montalvo, G. (2012). The effect of constructivist mathematics on
achievement in rural Schools. Rural Educator, 33(3), 37-46.
Greiffenhagen, C. (2000, July). Interactive whiteboards in mathematics education: Possibilities
and dangers. Paper presented at the 9th International Congress on Mathematical
Education, Tokyo, Japan.
Hallett, D., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural
knowledge when learning fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 395-406.
doi: 10.1037/a0017486
Han W. J. (2007). The correlation between elementary school students’ multiple intelligences
and English reading proficiency”, master thesis abstract, Retrieved on 3 September 2017
from: http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=q5.YaQ/record?r1=1&h1=4.
Hawkes, M. & Cambre, M. (2001). Educational technology: Identifying the effects. Principal
Leadership, 1, 48-51.
Hennessy, S., Deaney, R., Ruthven, K., & Winterbottom, M. (2007). Pedagogical strategies for
using the interactive whiteboards to foster learner participation in school science.
Learning, Media and Technology, 32, 283-301.
Higgins, S., Beauchamp, G., & Miller, D. (2007). Reviewing the literature on interactive
whiteboards. Learning, Media and technology, 32(3), 213-225.
Hodge, S. & Anderson, B. (2007). Teaching and learning with an interactive whiteboard: A
teacher’s journey. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(3), 271-282.
Hsin, C.T., Li, M.C. & Tsai, C.C. (2014). The influence of young children's use of technology on
their learning: A review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 17(4), 85-99.
Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading statistics and research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIOANL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 8(4), 303-318
316
Jacobsen, M., Clifford, P., & Friesen, S. (2002). Preparing teachers for technology integration:
Creating a culture of inquiry in the context of use. Contemporary Issues in Technology
and Teacher Education, 2(3) 363-388.
Jones, M. H., Irvin, M. J., & Kibe, G. W. (2012). Does geographic setting alter the roles of
academically supportive factors? African American adolescents' friendships, math selfconcept,
and math performance. Journal of Negro Education, 81(4), 319-337
Keengwe, J. & Akyeampong, A. (2010). Technology integration barriers in K-12 urban
classrooms. In G. Siemens & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information
Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 2267-2271). Chesapeake,
VA: AACE.
Kennewell, S., Tanner, H., Jones, S., & Beauchamp, G. (2008). Analyzing the interactive
technology to implement interactive teaching. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,
24, 61-73.
Kidd, T. & Jared, K. (2010). Technology integration and urban schools: Implications for
instructional practices. International Journal of Information and Communication
Technology Education, 6, 51. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/jicte.2010070105
Laffey, J. M., Espinosa, L., Moore, J., & Lodree, A. (2003). Supporting learning and behaviour of
at-risk young children: Computers in urban education. Journal of Research on
Technology in Education, 35(4), 423-440.
Lee, M. Y. (2006). A study of college students’ multiple intelligences, self-efficacy and learning
intention, master thesis abstract, Retrieved on 3 September 2017 from: http://ndltd.
ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=q5.YaQ/record?r1=1&h1=5.
Littleton K., Twiner A., & Gillen J. (2010). Instruction as orchestration: Multimodal connection
building with the interactive whiteboard, pedagogies: An International Journal, 5(2),
130-141.
Liu, M., Scordino, R., Geurtz, R., Navarrete, C., Ko, Y., & Lim, M. (2014). A look at research on
mobile learning in K–12 education from 2007 to the present. Journal of Research on
Technology in Education, 46(4), 325-372.
Manny-Ikan, E., Tikochinski, T., Zorman, R., & Dagan, O. (2011). Using the interactive
whiteboard in teaching and learning - An evaluation of the SMART classroom pilot
project. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning Objects, 7, 249-273.
Martinez, M. (2010). Teacher education can’t ignore technology. Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 74-75.
Mercer, N., Warwick, P., Kershner, R., Kershner, S., & Kleine, J. (2010). Can the interactive
whiteboard help provide ‘dialogic space’ for children’s collaborative activity? Language
and Education, 24(5), 367-384.
Miller, D. & Glover, D. (2002). The interactive whiteboard as a force for pedagogic change: The
experience of five elementary schools in an English Education Authority. Information
Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2002(1), 5-19.
Morris, D. (2010). Are teachers technophobes? Investigating professional competency in the
use of ICT to support teaching and learning. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,
2(2), 4010-4015. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.632
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIOANL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 8(4), 303-318
317
National Center for Educational Statistics. (n.d.). Statistical standards: Defining race and
ethnicity data. Retrieved on 3 September from http://nces.ed.gov/statprog/2002/
std1_5.asp
Razmjoo S. A. (2008). On the relationship between multiple intelligences and Language
success, The Reading Matrix, 8(2), 155-174.
Rosenbaum, P.R. (1998). Propensity score. Retrieved on 3 September 2017 from
http://libproxy.library.unt.edu:2056/doi/10.1002/9781118445112.stat05196...
Rosenbaum, P. R. & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central of the propensity score in observational
studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41-44.
Sarsa, J. & Soler, R. (2011). Special features of interactive whiteboard software for motivating
students. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 1(3), 235-240.
Schneiter, K. (2010). Preparing teachers to use technology: Considerations from a capstone
mathematics and technology course. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher
Education, 10(4), 457-469.
Shadish W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental
designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Thomas, J.A. (2013). A mixed methods case study of the levels of interactive whiteboard use by
K-12 teachers (Doctoral Dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest. (3580526)
Torff, B. & Tirotta, R. (2010). Interactive whiteboards produce small gains in elementary
students’ self-reported motivation in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54, 379-
383. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.019
Turel, Y. K. & Johnson, T. E. (2012). Teachers' belief and use of interactive whiteboards for
teaching and learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 381-394.
Walker, D. (2002). Meet Whiteboard Wendy. Times Educational Supplement, 13, 13-22.
Wall, K., Higgins, S., & Smith, H. (2005). The visual helps me understand the complicated
things: Pupils’ views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards, British
Journal of Educational Technology, 36(5), 851-867.
Winzenried, A., Dalgarno, B., & Tinkler, J. (2010). The interactive whiteboard: A transitional
technology supporting diverse teaching practices. Australasian Journal of Educational
Technology, 26(4), 534-552.
Whyte, S., Beauchamp, G., & Alexander, J. (2014). Researching interactive whiteboard (IWB)
use from primary school to university settings across Europe: an analytical framework
for foreign language teaching. Cylchgrawn Addysg Prifysgol Cymru/University of Wales
Journal of Education, 17(1), 30-52.
Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn (2nd ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
Wood, R. & Ashfield, J. (2008). The use of the interactive whiteboard for creative teaching and
learning in literacy and mathematics: A case study. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 39(1), 84–96.
Young, J.R. & Young, J.L. (2012). “But that’s not fair”: Teacher technology readiness and African
American Students’. The Journal of the Texas Alliance of Black School Educators, 4(1),
19-32.