You are here

Home » Content

THE DIPLOMATIC MANEUVERS OF TURKEY IN WORLD WAR II

Journal Name:

  • Karadeniz Araştırmaları Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
The years between 1939 and 1945 corresponded with the Second World War, an extremely destructive period in which the countries of the world were subject to disintegration into the Allied and Axis Powers. Against the rise of German and Italian Fascism, the western democracies of Great Britain and the USA formed an alliance with the communist Soviet Union. Turkey had experienced the trauma of the First World War, had taken on the burden of the Ottoman Empire, which had already collapsed, and had fought the War of Independence after invasion by international forces. The Republic of Turkey was founded on principles in line with those of western democracies but was tired, lacked adequate military and economic resources, and had resolved not to take part in war unless its territorial integrity came under threat, a threat that was realized in the Second World War. Turkish politics were based on the decision to survive by maintaining the nation’s territorial integrity.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
1939-1945 yılları, dünyanın kaçınılmaz şekilde Müttefik ve Mihver olarak ayrışmaya uğradığı çok yıkıcı bir deneyim olan İkinci Dünya Savaşı’na işaret eder. Yükselişe geçen Alman ve İtalyan Faşizmine karşı, Büyük Britanya ve ABD batılı demokrasileri Komünist Sovyetler ile ittifak kurmuşlardır. Ancak, Türkiye, Birinci Dünya Savaşı’nın travmasını yaşamış, çökmüş bir Osmanlı İmparatorluğu’nun yükünü sırtlamış ve uluslararası güçlerin toprağını işgal etmelerine karşı bir kurtuluş savaşı vermiştir. Aynı zamanda, prensipleri Batı demokrasileriyle aynı çizgide olan Cumhuriyetçi bir ulus devlet kurmuştur. Türkiye Cumhuriyeti, İkinci Dünya Savaşı tehdidi ile karşı karşıya kaldığında, yorgun, askeri ve ekonomik kaynakları yetersiz ve kesinlikle ulusal toprak bütünlüğü tehdit edilmedikçe bir sıcak savaşa girmeme kararlılığındadır. Türk siyasetinin temelinde, ulusal toprak bütünlüğünü koruyarak yaşamını sürdürme kararlılığı vardır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-diplomatic-maneuvers-turkey-world-war-ii.pdf
  • 37
91
110
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

UNPUBLISHED DOCUMENTS
Cabinet Office:
CAB 66/34/14
Foreign Office:
Microfilms of 1936-1945: FO 954/28, Diplomatic Papers.
1941: FO 195/2469
BOOS AND ESSAYS
AÇIKALIN Cevat, (1947), “Turkey’s International Relations”, International
Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 23/4: 477-
491.
BİLGİN Mustafa Sıtkı-Steven Morewood, (2004), “Turkey’s Reliance on
Britain: British Political and Diplomatic Support for Turkey against Soviet
Demands, 1943-1947”, Middle Eastern Studies, 40/2: 24-57.
CHOIInsu (1995), Small States and the Balance of Power. Naval Post
Graduate School Monterey, California (Unpublished masters thesis).
COOPER Malcolm, (2002), “The Legacy of Atatürk: Turkish Political
Structures and Policy Making.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of
International Affairs 1944-), 78/1: 115-128.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, (1955), Foreign Relations of the United
States. The Conferences at Malta and Yalta, 1945, Washington: United States
Government Printing Office.
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, (1961), Foreign Relations of the United
States. Conferences at Cairo and Tehran 1943, Washington: United States
Government Printing Office.
DERİNGİL Selim, (1982), “The Preservation of Turkey’s Neutrality
during the Second World War: 1940.” Middle Eastern Studies, 18/1: 30-52.
Hakan Özden
110
DERİNGİL Selim, (1989), Turkish Foreign Policy during the Second
World War:An ActiveNeutrality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
EDITORIAL (1942), “Turkey and the War, Maintenance of Independence:
Fight to the Last Man”,The Times, August 6: 3.
FOX Annette Baker, (1967), The Power of Small States: Diplomacy in
World War II. 2nd ed., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
GÜÇLÜ Yüksel, (1997), Turco-British Rapprochement on the Eve of the
Second World War.The Turkish Yearbook of International Relations.
Ankara: Ankara ÜniversitesiBasımevi.
HAKKI Murat Metin, (2007), “Surviving the Pressure of the Superpowers:
An Analysis of Turkish Neutrality during the Second World War”,
An Electronic History Journal, 3: 44-62.
LANDAU Jacob M., (1995), Pan-Turkism: From Irredentism to
Cooperation. 2nd ed., Bloomington, IN:Indiana University Press.
MACFIE AL (1989), “The Turkish Straits in the Second World War,
1939-45”, Middle Eastern Studies, 25/2: 238-248.
ORGANSKI A.F.K., (1960), World Politics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
ROTHSTEIN Robert L. (1968). Alliances and Small Powers. New York:
Columbia University Press.
RUBIN Barry, (1980), The Great Powers in the Middle East 1941-1947:
The Road to Cold War. London: Frank Cass.
SILVERSON Randolph M.-Michael R. Tennefoss, (1984), “Power,
Alliance and the Escalation of International Conflict, 1815-1965.” American
Political Science Review, 78/4: 1057-1069.
SPYKMAN Nicholas J.-Abbie A. Rollins, (1939a), “Geographic Objectives
in Foreign Policy I”, The American Political Science Review, 33/3: 391-410.
SPYKMAN Nicholas J.-Abbie A. Rollins, (1939b), “Geographic Objectives
in Foreign Policy II”, The American Political Science Review,33/4: 591-614.
TAMKIN Nicholas, (2009), Britain, Turkey and the Soviet Union, 1940-
45: Strategy, Diplomacy and Intelligence in the Eastern Mediterranean. New
York: Palgrave Macmillan.
VANDERLIPPE John M., (2001), “A Cautious Balance: The Question of
Turkey in World War 2”, The Historian, 64/1: 63-80.
WEISBAND Edward, (1973), Turkish Foreign Policy 1943-1945.
Princeton: Princeton University Press.
WIGHT Martin, (1978), Power Politics (ed. Hedley Bull and Carstern
Holbraad), New York: Holmes and Meier.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com