Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

ATRAVMATIK RESTORATIF TEDAVİ IÇIN KULLANILAN CAM IYONOMER SIMANLARIN MIKROSIZINTISI

THE MICROLEAKAGE OF GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS USED FOR ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2011

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Introduction: The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique is an innovative, largely painfree, minimal intervention approach for treating carious teeth. Purpose: This in-vitro study evaluated the microleakage of glass ionomer cements used for atraumatic restorative treatment. Material-Method: 48 extracted human teeth having aproximal caries were used. The carious lesions were removed by hand instruments. The teeth were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=12) and restored with Ketac Molar Aplicap, Kavitan Pro, Fuji IX GC and Ionobond glass ionomer cements. After thermal cycling, the teeth were sectioned through the mesiodistal direction from the center of the restorations and microleakage scores were observed. The data were analyzed statistically. Results: There was no significant difference between materials used in the study (p0.05). As shown in Tables II-V, approximately twice or more microleakage was observed at gingival margins when compared with occlusal margins for all materials (p0.05). Conclusion: As shown in this study, glass ionomer cements showed more microleakage at gingival than occlusal margins of ART cavities.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
GiriĢ: Atravmatik restoratif tedavi (ART) tekniği çürük diĢ tedavisinde yenilikçi, büyük oranda ağrısız ve minimal invaziv bir yöntemdir. Amaç: Bu in-vitro çalıĢmanın amacı, atravmatik restoratif tedavi de kullanılan cam iyonomer simanlarda meydana gelen mikrosızıntı miktarlarını değerlendirmektir. Gereç-Yöntem: ÇalıĢmada arayüz çürüklü 48 çekilmiĢ insan diĢi kullanıldı. Çürük lezyonlar el aletleri kullanılarak uzaklaĢtırıldı. DiĢler rastgele 4 gruba ayrıldı (n=12), ve Ketac Molar Aplicap, Kavitan Pro, Fuji IX GC ve Ionobond glass ionomer simanlar ile restore edildi. Termal siklus iĢleminin ardından, düĢük hızlı elmas hassas kesme cihazı (Isomet Saw, Buechler Ltd, Evanston IL,ABD) kullanılarak restorasyon merkezinden mesio-distal yönde boylu boyunca kesildi ve mikrosızıntı seviyeleri gözlemlendi. Veriler istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: ÇalıĢmada kullanılan materyalller arasında anlamlı fark bulunamadı (p0.05). Tablo II-V‟te de gösterildiği gibi, bölgesel karĢılaĢtırma yapıldığında, tüm materyallerde gingival kenarlarda okluzal kenarlara kıyasla iki kat veya daha fazla mikrosızıntı gözlemlendi (p<0.05). Sonuç: Yapılan bu çalıĢmada cam ionomer simanların ART kavitelerinde diĢeti kenarında oklüzal kenardan daha fazla mikrosızıntı gösterdikleri bulunmuĢtur.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-atravmatik-restoratif-tedavi-icin-kullanilan-cam-iyonomer-simanlarin-mikrosizintisi.pdf
  • 3
175-181
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Ferreira FD, Perreira MP, Jansen WC, Paiva SM,
Pordeus IA. Performance of Brazilian and
imported glass ionomer cements used in
Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) regarding
microleakage in primary molars. J Appl Oral Sci
2006; 14(5): 312-8.
2. Platt J.A., Rhodes B. Microleakage of high-strength
glass ionomer: resin composite restorations in
minimally invasive treatment. J Indiana Dent
Assoc. 2001-2002 ; 80(4): 20-2.
3. Frencken J.E., Holmgren C.J. How effective is ART
in the mangement of dental caries? Community
Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999; 27(6): 423-430.
4. Mjör I.A, Gordan V.V. A review of atraumatic
restorative treatment (ART). International Dental
Journal 1999;49(3):127-131.
5. Smales R.J, Yip HK. The atraumatic restorative
treatment (ART) approach for the management of
dental caries. Quintessence Int 2002; 33(6): 427-
432.
6. Yip H.K., Smales R.J., Peng D. The effects of two
cavity preparation methods on the longevity of
glass ionomer restorations: an evaluation after 12
months. JADA 2002; 133(6): 744-751.
7. Mandari G.J., Truin G.J., Van‟t Hof M.A., Frencken
J.E. Effectiveness of three minimal intervention
approaches for managing dental caries: survival of
restorations after 2 years. Caries Res 2001; 35(2):
90-94.
8. Wadwenya R., Smith J., Mante F. Microleakage of
nano-particle-filled resin-modified glass ionomer
using atraumatic restorative technique in primary
molars. N Y State Dent J. 2010 ;76(4): 36-9.
9. Ersin N.K., Candan Ü., Aykut A., Eronat C., Önçağ
Ö. ART Tekniğini Takiben Daimi Molar DiĢlere
Uygulanan Cam Ġyonomer Siman ve Kompozit
Rezin Dolgu Materyallerinin 2 Yıllık Klinik Takibi.
Hacettepe DiĢ Hek Fak Dergisi 2007; 31(1): 3-11.
10. Smales R.J, Yip H.K. The atraumatic restorative
treatment (ART) approach for primary teeth:
review of literature. Pediatric Dentistry 2000;
22(4): 294-298.
11. Pereira L.C.G., Nunes M.C.P., Dibb R.G.P., Powers
J.M., Roulet J.F., Navarro M.F.L. Mechanical
properties and bond strengths of glass-ionomer
cements. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4(3): 73-80.
12. Ferreira F.de M., do Vale M.P., Jansen W.C., Paiva
S.M., Pordeus I.A. Effect of mixing process on
microleakage of glass ionomer cements used in
atraumatic restorative treatment on primary
molars. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2007; 31(4): 251-6.
Atatürk Üniv. DiĢ Hek. Fak. Derg. ġENER, ġENGUN, KUġDEMĠR,
J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni ÖZTÜRK, BAĞLAR
Cilt:21, Sayı: 3, Yıl: 2011, Sayfa: 175-181
181
13. Palma-Dibb R.G., de Castro C.G., Ramos R.P.,
Chimello D.T., Chinelatti M.A. Bond strengths of
glass-ionomer cements to caries-effected dentin. J
Adhes Dent 2003; 5(1): 57-62.
14. Mouth G.J., Hume W.R. A new cavity classification.
Aust Dent J. 1998; 43(3): 153-9.
15. Wadenya R.O., Yego C., Mante F.K. Marginal
microleakage of alternative restorative treatment
and conventional glass ionomer restorations in
extracted primary molars. J Dent Child (Chic).
2010; 77(1): 32-5.
16. Bonifácio C.C., van Amerongen W.E., Meschini
T.G., Raggio D.P., Bönecker M. Flowable glass
ionomer cement as a liner: improving marginal
adaptation of atraumatic restorative treatment
restorations. J Dent Child (Chic). 2010; 77(1): 12-
6.
17. Castro A., Feigal R.E. Microleakage of a new
improved glass ionomer restorative material in
primary and permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent. 2002;
24: 23-8.
18. Xie H., Zhang F., Wu Y., Chen C., Liu W. Dentine
bond strength and microleakage of flowable
composite, compomer and glass ionomer cement.
Aust Dent J. 2008; 53(4): 325-31.
19. Delmé K.I., Deman P.J., De Bruyne M.A., De Moor
R.J. Microleakage of four different restorative glass
ionomer formulations in class V cavities: Er:YAG
laser versus conventional preparation. Photomed
Laser Surg. 2008 Dec;26(6):541-9.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com