Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

FARKLI YÖNTEMLERLE PÜRÜZLENDİRİLMİŞ MİNE YÜZEYLERİNİN FOTOĞRAFİK GÖRÜNTÜLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

THE PHOTOGRAPHIC COMPARISON OF ENAMEL SURFACES ROUGHENED BY DIFFERENT METHODS

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Objective: Aim of this study was to investigate the effect of three different roughening methods on the enamel surface, and also to determine less harmful the roughening method on the enamel surfaces. Materials and Methods: Newly extracted thirty premolar teeth were divided into three groups randomly. Group I (n=10) were etched with 37% phosphoric acid. Group II (n=10) were roughened with 18% HCL and pumice mixture (microabrasion). Group III (n=10) were sandblasted with 50 μ aluminum oxide particles. Standardized surface photographs were taken by using a digital photograph machine, and these photographs are scored. The descriptive statistics were calculated for each group. Wilcoxon Signed Ranks was executed to evaluate differences of scores. P values less than to .05 were considered statistically significant. Results: Enamel roughening was observed in all groups, with the most extensive roughening in Group I and the smallest in Group II. There was appeared that microabrasion method gave clinically the finest enamel surface. (P=0.03) Conclusions: Microabrasion with 18% HCL and pumice mixture which alternative enamel roughening method has given very close appearances to original enamel surface. Fine polished enamel surfaces occur after the microabrasion convenience of dental plaque control during orthodontic treatment.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üç farklı mine pürüzlendirme metodunun mine yüzeyine etkisini incelemek ve mine yüzeyleri üzerine en az zararlı olan pürüzlendirme yöntemini saptamaktır. Yöntem: Yeni çekilmiş 30 adet küçük azı dişi rasgele üç gruba ayrıldı. Grup I (n=10) %37’lik ortofosforik asit ile asitlendi. Grup II (n=10) %18 HCL ve pomza karışımı ile pürüzlendirildi (mikrabrazyon). Grup III (n=10) ise 50 μ çapında alüminyum oksit kullanılarak kumlandı. Dijital fotoğraf makinesi kullanılarak standart uzaklıktan vestibül yüzey fotoğrafları alındı ve bu fotoğraflar skorlandı. Tanımlayıcı istatistikler her bir grup için yapıldı. Fotoğraf görüntülerinin karşılaştırılmasında Wilcoxon Signed Ranks testi kullanıldı. P değeri .05 ten küçük olanlar istatistiksel olarak anlamlı olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Grupların hepsinde mine yüzeyi pürüzlenmesi görüldü. En belirgin pürüzlenmenin Grup I’de, en az pürüzlenmenin ise Grup II’de meydana geldiği izlendi. (P=0,03) Sonuçlar: Alternatif bir mine pürüzlendirme yöntemi olan %18 HCL ve pomza karışımı ile mikroabrazyon işlemi orijinal mine yüzeyine en yakın görüntüleri vermiştir. Mikroabrazyondan sonra mine yüzeyinde meydana gelen ince cilalı yüzey ortodontik tedavi süresince dental plağın kontrolünde kolaylık sağlamaktadır.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-farkli-yontemlerle-puruzlendirilmis-mine-yuzeylerinin-fotografik-goruntulerinin-karsilastirilmasi.pdf
  • 2
155-160
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Bradburn G, Pender N. An in vitro study of the bond
strength of two light-cured composites used in the
direct bonding of orthodontic brackets to molars.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;(102):418–
426.
2. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic
bonding. Br J Orthod. 1976;(2):171–178.
3. Newman SM, Dresseler KB, Grenadier MR. Direct
bonding of orthodontic brackets to esthetic
restorative materials using a silane. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 1984;(86):503–506.
4. Atsü, S., Gelgör, İ.E., ve Şahin, V., “Effects of Silica-
Coating and Silane Surface Conditioning on the
Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets to
Enamel,” Angle Orthod, 2006;(76), 804-809.
5. Livaditis GJ, Thompson VP. Etched castings: an
improved retentive mechanism for resin-bonded
retainers. J Prosthet Dent. 1982;(47):52–58.
6. Livaditis GJ. A chemical etching system for creating
micromechanical retention in resin-bonded
retainers. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; (56):181–188.
7. Vander Veen JH, Jongebloed WL, Dijk F. SEM study
of six retention systems for resin to six differently
treated metal surfaces. Dent Mater. 1988;
(4):272–277.
8. Alberts HF. Metal-resin bonding. Adept Report.
1991;(2):29–36.
9. Newman GV, Newman RA, Sun BI, Ha JJ, Ozsoylu
SA. Adhesion promoters, their effect on the bond
strength of metal brackets. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop. 1995; (108):237–241.
10. Kocadereli I, Ciğer S, Tuncel M, llgi S. The tensile
bond strength of young permanent teeth with
shorter etching times. Turk J Orthod 1995;(8):242-
246.
11. Wang WW, Lu TL. Bond strength with various
etching times on young permanent teeth. Am J
Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;(100):72-79.
12. Sheen DH,Wang WN, Tarng TH. Bond strength of
younger and older permanent teeth with various
etching times. Angle Orthod 1993;(63):225-230.
13. Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Silicoating. Evaluation
of a new method of bonding composite resin to
metal. Scand J Dent Res. 1988;(96):171–176.
14. Gerbo LR. Lacefield WR. Wells BR. Russell CM. The
effect of enamel preparation on the tensile bond
strength of orthodontic composite resin. Angle
Orthod. 1992;(62):275-281.
15. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel
preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison
between the use of a sandblaster and current
techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
1997;(111):366-373.
16. Buyukyilmaz T, Zachrisson BU. Improved
orthodontic bonding to silver amalgam: Part 2.
Lathe-cut, admixed, and spherical amalgams with
different intermediate resins. Angle Orthod
1998;(68):337-344.
17. Canay Ş, Kocadereli İ, Akça E. The effect of
enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded
metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2000;(117):15-19.
18. van Waveren Hogervorst WL. Feilzer AJ. Prahl-
Andersen B. The air-abrasion technique versus the
conventional acid-etching technique: A
quantification of surface enamel loss and a
comparison of shear bond strength. Am J Orthod
Dentofacial Orthop 2000;(117):20-26
19. Gelgör, İ.E., ve Büyükyılmaz, T.A., “A Practical
Approach to White Spot Lesion Removal,” World J
Orthod 2003;(4): 152-156.
20. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Enamel color modification
by controlled hydrochloric acid-pumice abrasion. 1.
Technique and examples. Quintessence Int 1986;
(17):81-87.
21. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Enamel color modification
by controlled hydrochloric acid-pumice abrasion.
II. Further examples. Quintessence Int 1986;
(17):157-164.
Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg. ÇAĞLAROĞLU, ÇATALBAŞ,
J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni GELGÖR
Cilt:22, Sayı: 2, Yıl: 2012, Sayfa: 154-159
159
22. Croll TP, Cavanaugh RR. Hydrochloric acid-pumice
enamel surface abrasion for color modification:
results after six months. Quintessence Int 1986;
(17):335-341.
23. Baysal A, Uysal T. Do enamel microabrasion and
casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium
phosphate bond strenght of orthodontics brackets
bonded to a demineralized enamel surface? Angle
Orthod 2011 Jul 25.(Epub ahead of print).
24. Sungurtekin E, Bani M, Oztas N. Mine
puruzlendirme yöntemleri. GU Dis Hek Fak Derg
2009; (26):189-194
25. Silverstone LM, Saxton CA, Dogon JL, Fejerkov O.
Variations in the pattern of acid-etching of human
enamel examined by scanning electron
microscope. Caries Res. 1975; (9):373–387.
26. Galil KA, Wright GZ. Acid etching patterns on
buccal surfaces of permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent.
1979; (1):230–234.
27. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel
preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison
between the use of a sandblaster and current
techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;
(111):366-373.
28. Gelgör IE. Mikroabrazyon ile pürüzlendirilmiş diş
yüzeyleri ile geleneksel pürüzlendirilmiş diş
yüzeylerinin braket tutuculuğu yönünden
karşılaştırılması. KKÜ, BAB Araştırma Projesi.
Kırıkkale 2008.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com