Buradasınız

ÜNİVERSİTELERDE E-DEVLET VE İNOVASYON POLİTİKALARI, GELİŞMEKTE OLAN ÜLKELERİN ÖRNEĞİ

E-GOVERNMENT AND INNOVATION POLICIES IN UNIVERSITIES, CASE OF DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author Name
Abstract (2. Language): 
Currently SMEs have been accepted as the main engine for establishment of electronic government structure based on innovation systems. This paper discusses this concept in developing countries and also the necessity to shift from SME,s orientation method to universities orientation method in developing countries as a paradigm of domestic management of e-government .So the study analyzes the innovation policy in universities based on a review of development program in an e-government structure. In an indirect process for determining the eligibility of higher education institutions to participate and create policy innovations in state e-government programs it has directed that institutions are eligible for participation if they meet two fundamental conditions: 1-Be able to evaluate ,monitor, analyze and predict fundamental changes in science and technology in order to keep abreast of the global fundamental changes in science and technology. 2-Be able to develop priorities plan to organize technological activities of the country to reengineer nationwide development of science and technology and to provide a This issues and circumstances are surrounding the initial development of evaluation and monitoring and major changes in procedure and standards. Also attention is given to some of the challenges that presently are posing for evaluation procedures as growing complexity, globalization and advances in instructional uses of electronic technology allow new forms of higher education provision to emerge. The exiting policies need to be re-examined, and new policies developed. While higher education innovations must be recognized, it is also true that monitoring agencies have greatly assisted their career. In this process monitoring agencies serve as a public brain system to advocate changes that will improve higher education practice.

REFERENCES

References: 

Association of European Universities. 1997, Institutioanl evaluation as a tool for change,Geneva,CRE.
Barker, Linton (2000). "Customer-Focused Government", Public Services Productivity Panel. UK.
Bernnan, J.1990.Quality Assessment in the public Sector in Britain., peer review and Performance Indicators: Quality Assessment in British and Dutch Higher education
Council for Higher Education Accreditation,(2003),Quality Review, Washington DC
Dumond E. J. (2000), "Value Management: An underlying framework", International Journal of Operations and Product Management, Vol. 20, No. 99, PP. 1062-1077.
El-Khawas,E.2001."Developing a strategy for quality assurance".In:chapman,D.and Austin,A.(editors).Higher education in developing world. New York
EI-Khowas E,(2001),Accreditation in the USA,Origins,Developments and Future Prospects,UNESCO,Paris,France
Fu, Tony & Yu, Lay, (2000). “Toward A Theory of Entrepreneurial State” International Journal of Social Economics, Vol. 8, No. 9.
Glanfield, Stephen (2001). "Improving Customer Access and Delivering Citizen Focused Services', Stroll District Council.
Henkle,M.1998,Evaluation in Higher Education:Conceptual and Epistemological Foundations,European Journal of higher education,Vol 33,No.3 pp.285-298.
Institute for Research and Planning in Higher Education,(2003)Higher Education In Iran,A National Report,Tehran,Iran
International Development Research Center(1986), With Our Hands,IDRC,Ottawa,Canada
International Development Research Center(1982),Financing Educational Development,Proceedings of an international seminar held in Mont Sainte Marie,Canada
Macintyre,A,1981,After virtue:A study in Moral Theory,London,Duckworth
Middle States commission on Higher Education,Designs for excellence:Handbook for institutional self-study,seventh Edition,Philadelphia,PA:MSA.
Mierlo, Van, (2000). Public Entrepreneurship As Innovative Management…, Presented at 65th Annual Conference of South Economic Association.
Morris, Michael H. & Jones Foard F., (1999). “Entrepreneurship In Established Organization”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 24, Issue 1.
OPSR / Office of Public Service Reforms(2002), Report: "Principles of Customer Feedback and Idle Framework for Research in Public Service".
Salmi,J.,(2001)."Higher Education at a turning point."In:chapman,D.and Austin,A.(editors),2001,Higher education in the developing world, New York:Greenwood
Schiavo, Lucalo (2000). Quality Standards in the Public Sector, Public Administration, Vol. 78, Issue 3.
Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution(2003),Articles os association of fund for supporting the researches in country,SCCR Resolution,Tehran,Iran
United Nations,(2003),Common Country assessment for the Islamic Republic of Iran,Tehran,Islamic Republic of Iran
Vaezi,Seyed Kamal (2005),"Application of Knowledge Management in Organizational Management" International Congress of ICEB,Hong Kong
Vaezi, Seyed Kamal, (2003), “A new approach to public Management", International Conference on management, sharif University of Technology, Proceeding,Tehran,Iran
Vaezi ,Seyed kamal (2004),Privatization of Higher Education in the Islamic republic of Iran, The congress of Privatization of Higher Education :Challenges and Quality Perspectives, University of Hyderabad, India.
All righs reserved by The JKEM 183
Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi / 2010 Cilt: V Sayı: I
Vaezi,Seyed Kamal (2006),A review of monitoring and evaluation roles in research development program.,Higher Education Forum,UNESCO,Paris
Van Vught,F;Westerheijden,D,1993.Qualty Management and Quality Assurance in European Higher Education:methods and mechanisms,Luxembourg,office of the official publications of the European Commission.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com