Baroody, A. J. (1989). Manipulatives don’t come with guarantees. The Arithmetic

Teacher 37(2). 4-5.

Bassano, S. (1982). Multi-sensory input in the non-academic ESL classroom. CATESOL

Occasional Papers, 8, 51-60.

Bruner, J. (1973). Beyond the information given. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Bullock, J. (Personal communication, October 2003).

Bybee, R. W. (1982) Piaget for educators. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing

Company.

Cazden, C. (1981). Performance before competence: Assistance to child discourse in the

zone of proximal development. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of

Comparative Human Cognition, 3(1), 5-8.

Chester, J., Davis, J., & Reglin, G. (1991). Math manipulatives use and math

achievement of third grade students. University of North Carolina at Charlotte.

Clements, D. (1999). ‘Concrete’ manipulatives, concrete ideas. Contemporary Issues in

Early Childhood, 1(1), 45-60.

Dev, P.C., Doyle, B.A., & Valente, B. (2002). Labels needn’t stick: “At-risk” first

graders rescued with appropriate intervention. Journal of Education for Students

Placed at Risk, 7(3), 327-332.

Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling and

literate discourse. In L., Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional

implications and applications of socio-historical psychology (pp. 175-205). New

York: Cambridge University Press.

Hiebert, J. (1988). A theory of developing competence with written mathematical

symbols. Educational Studies in Mathematics (19), 333-355.

Hiebert, J. (1989). The struggle to link written symbols with understandings: An update.

The Arithmetic Teacher 36(7), 38-43.

Institute for Multi-sensory Education. (2000). Orton-Gillingham.com. Retrieved

February 7, 2003, from http://www.orton-gillingham.com/

Kalivoda, T. B. (1978). Increasing communication with multi-sensory exercises.

Hispania, 61(4), 923-926. Retrieved November 11, 2003, from JSTOR.

Kamii, C. (1982). Number in preschool and kindergarten: Educational implications of

Piaget’s theory. Washington, D. C.: National Association of the Education of

Young Children.

Kamii, C., Lewis, B. A., & Booker, B. M. (1998). Instead of teaching missing addends.

Teaching Children Mathematics, 4, 458-461. Retrieved September 17, 2003,

from EBSCOhost.

Kamii , C., & Rummelsburg, J. (2008). Arithmetic for first graders lacking number

concepts. Teaching Children Mathematics, 14(7), 389-394.

Kelly, C., Durham, R., & Rains, J. (2004, October). Using multi-sensory materials for

supplementing the elementary mathematics curriculum: Necessary or not? Paper

presented at the meeting of School Science and Mathematics Association,

Atlanta, GA.

Kuhn, J. N., & Schroeder, H. H. (1971). A multisensory approach for teaching spelling.

Elementary English, 48(7), 865-869.

Marzola, E. S. (1987). Using manipulatives in math instruction. Reading, Writing, and

Learning Disabilities, 3, 9-20.

Moll, L. C. (1990). Introduction. In L., Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education:

Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology (pp. 1-

27). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Moyer, P.S., Boylard, J.J., & Spikell, M.A. (2002). What are virtual manipulatives?

Teaching Children Mathematics, 8(6), 372-377.

NCTM (1973). Instructional Aids in Mathematics, Thirty-fourth Yearbook.

NCTM (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: An Overview.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 USC § 6301 (2002).

Perry, W.G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years:

A scheme. New York: Holt, Reinhart, & Winston.

Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence; an

essay on the construction of formal operational structures. New York: Basic

Books.

Piaget, J. (1965). The child’s conception of number. New York: W. W. Norton &

Company Inc.

Reys, R. E. (1971). Considerations for teachers using manipulative materials. The

Arithmetic Teacher, 18 (8) 551-558.

Scott, K. S. (1993). Multisensory mathematics for children with mild disabilities.

Exceptionality, 4(2), 97-111.

Sowell, E. J. (1989). Effects of manipulative materials in mathematics instruction.

Journal for Research in Mathematics Instruction, 20(5), 498-505.

Spicer, J. (2000). Virtual manipulatives: A new tool for hands-on math. ENC Focus,

7(4), 14-15.

Suydam, M. N., & Higgins, J. L. (1984). Manipulative materials. Arithmetic Teacher,

33, 27.

Thorne, B. M., & Henley T. B. (1997). Connections in the history and systems of

psychology. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Thornton, C. A., Jones, G. A., & Toohey, M. A. (1982). A multisensory approach to

thinking strategies for remedial instruction in basic addition facts. Journal for

Research in Mathematics Education, 14(3), 198-203.

Tudge, J. (1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development and peer collaboration:

implications for classroom practices. In L., Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education:

Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology (pp.

155-174). New York: Cambridge University Press.

United States Department of Education. (n.d.). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved

November 26, 2003, available from

http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml?src=ln

Van de Walle, J. (2007). Teaching developmentally: Elementary and middle school

mathematics (6th Ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological

processes. (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S., S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds &

Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com