Buradasınız

KAOS TEORİSİ NİN GENEL BİR DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

A General Assessment of the Chaos Theory

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The Chaos Theory is a contemporary approach that was derived from the General Systems Theory of Ludvig von Bertalanffy, an Austrian descent scientist. Bertalanffy defined a system that is in an interaction with its parts, has common properties, and is constituted of complex parts. The system could be either predictable, linear and deterministic, or unpredictable, nonlinear and probabilistic. Therefore, the system sustains its process ofchange and obtains new critical points through the effect of the internal or external factors. However, within the Chaos Theory dwells on unstable, periodical, and non-linear dynamic system of actions. Chaotic structures, stemmingfrom an effect, move from their stable position and transfer to a new critical position at a new center of attraction, necessaryfor its unique characteristics. However, a chaotic system, instead of preserving its stable position in the long term, takes action with the least effect and transfers to a new center of attraction for a new stable order. Thus, the Chaos Theory with its contribution to forecast the new positions ofnon linear structures, is implemented in the various science fields such as psychology, psychics, business, biology, economics and strategic management, etc. The objective of this study is to assess the Chaos Theory from a unique point of view. Its scope is to make comments beginning with the General Systems Theory and provide knowledge on its current implementations and to enrich this theoretical study the sources provided from comprehensive and reliable data bases.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Kaos Teorisi, Avusturya asıllı ünlü bilim adamı Ludvig von Bertalnffy'nin Genel Sistem Teorisinden türetilmiş çağdaş bir yaklaşımdır. Bertalanffy1 nin sistemi karşılıklı bir etkileşim içinde olan ortak özellikli ve kompleks yapıdaki parçalar olarak tanımlanmıştır. Sistem, öngörülebilir yani doğrusal, deterministik ya da öngörülemez yani doğrusal olmayan, probabilistiktir. Bu nedenle, sistem iç ve dış çevresinin etkisi ile yeni denge noktaları bularak değişimini sürdürür. Kaos Teorisi ise, istikrarsız, periyodik ve doğrusal olmayan sistemlerin dinamik hareketleri ile ilgilenir. Kaotik yapılar, özelliği gereği, başlangıç durumundan bağımsız olarak, küçük bir etki sonucunda, denge noktasından hareket ederek, yeni bir çekim merkezinde ve kritik noktada denge sağlarlar. Ancak, kaotik sistemler, dengelerini uzun vadede korumak yerine, en küçük bir etki ile harekete geçip, farklı hareket kalıpları içinde yeni dengeler bulurlar. Dolayısı ile değişim süreci öngörülemeyen yapıların yeni dengelerinin hesap edilmesine katkısı nedeniyle, Kaos Teorisi psikoloji, fizik, işletme, yönetim, biyoloji, ekonomi ve stratejik yönetim gibi bilim alanlarında uygulanma olasılığı bulur. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Kaos Teorisini, özgün bir bakış açısı ile değerlendirmek, kapsamı Genel Sistem Teorisinden başlayarak günümüzdeki uygulama alanları hakkında bilgi vermek ve de bu teorik temelli çalışmayı kapsamlı ve güvenilir veri tabanlarından sağlanan kaynaklar ile zenginleştirerek literatüre katkıda bulunmaktır.
61-79

REFERENCES

References: 

ARCISZEWSKI, T.; SAER, T. ve SCHUM, D. (2003), "Conceptual designing: Chaos-based approach",
Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 13, pp. 45-60. BERTALANFFY, von L. (1972), "The History and Status of General Systems Theory", Academy of
ManagementJoumal,Vo\. 15, No. 4, pp. 407^126. DIAMOND, A. (1993), "Chaos Science: Ubiquitous revolutionary theory has implications for marketing
researchers and their predictions", Marketing Research, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 9-14.
Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Cilt 2, Sayı 1, Aralık 2009
Kaos Teorisi'nin Genel Bir Değerlendirmesi
DOLAN, S.;
GARCIA
, S. ve AEURBACH, A. (2003); "Understanding and Managing Chaos in Organizations", InternationalJournal of Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 23-35.
GULYAEV S. ve STONYER, H. (2002), "Making a map of science: general systems theory as a conceptual framework for tertiary science education"; International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 24, No. 7, pp. 753-769.
HELOU, M. ve CADDY, I. (2006), "Definition Problems and a General Sistems Theory Perspective in Supply Chain Management"; Profc/ems and Perspectives in Management, Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 77-83.
HOLDEN,
L
. (2005), "Complex adaptive systems: concept analysis",_/owratJ? of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 651-657.
HORTON, T (2006), "Competition or monopoly? The implications of complexity science, chaos theory and evolutionary biology for antitrust and competition policy", The Antitrust Bulletin, Vol.51, No. 1, pp. 195-214.
HUDSON, C. (2000), "At The Edge of Chaos: A New Paradigm for Social Work", Journal of Social Work
Education, Vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 215-230. KWIATKOWSKA, T. (2001), "Beyond Uncertanities",.B/tta & the Environment, Vol. 6, No.l, pp. 96-115. LOCKER, M. (2006); "Systems Theory and the Conundrum of Ens: Thoughts and Aphorisms",
Foundations of Science, Vol. 11, pp. 297-317. McBRIDE, N. (2005), "Chaos theory as a model for interpreting information systems in organizations",
Information SystemsJournal, Vol.15, pp. 233-254. PASCALE, R. (1999), "Surfing the Edge of Chaos", Sloan Management Review, pp. 83-94. PRYOR, R. ve BRIGHT, J. (2006), "Counseling chaos: techniques for practitioners"; Journal of
Employment Counseling,Vol. 43, pp. 2-16. SMITH, W. ve HIGGINS, M. (2003); "Postmodernism and Popularisation: The Culture Life of Chaos
Theory", Culture and Organization, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 93-104. SPRONCK, W ve COMPERNOLLE, T. (1997); "Sytems Theory and Family Therapy: From a Critique
on Systems Theory to a Theory on Sytem Change", Contemporary Family Thearaphy,
Vol.l9,No.2,pp. 147-175. STAVERN, van I. (1999); "Chaos Theory and Institutional Economics: Metaphor Model?", Journal of
EconomicIssues,Vol. 23, No. 1, pp.141-160. WARREN, K; FRANKLIN, C. ve STREETER, C. (1998), "New Directions in Systems Theory: Chaos
and Complexity", Social Work, Vol. 43, No.4, pp. 357-372.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com