Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

THE EFFECT OF 5E LEARNING CYCLE MODEL IN TEACHING TRIGONOMETRY ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT AND THE PERMANENCE OF THEIR KNOWLEDGE

Journal Name:

  • International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the effect of 5E learning cycle model, based on the constructivist approach, which is used for teaching trigonometry in 10th grade of elementary mathematics education, on the students’ academic achievement and on the permanence of their trigonometry knowledge is investigated. The participants of this research are 10th grade students registered for spring semester of 2010-2011 academic year to an Anatolian high school in Kastamonu. These students divided into two equal groups, a control and an experimental group. The students in the experimental group took the course about trigonometry from the researcher in an environment where the 5E learning model based on the constructivist approach is used. The students in the control group took the same course from their mathematics teacher in an environment where the activities of official mathematics curriculum are used. The statistical findings of the research show that the experimental group students’ scores of academic achievement and permanence of trigonometric knowledge are higher than those in the control group. The difference between these groups is statistically significant and is in favor of the experimental group.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-effect-5e-learning-cycle-model-teaching-trigonometry-students-academic-achievement-and-permanence-their-knowledge.pdf
  • 1
73-87
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Adamek, T., Penkalski K., ve Valentine G., (2005). “The History of Trigonometry,History of Mathematics” ,
www.math.rutgers.edu/~mjraman/History_Of_Trig.pdfweb ( 12.05.2009).
Akar, E., (2005). “Effectiveness of 5E Learning Cycle Model on Students” Understanding of Acid and Base
Concepts. Unpublished Master Thesis. Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
Altunay, D., (2004). “Oyunla Desteklenmiş Matematik Öğretiminin Öğrenci Erişine Ve Kalıcılığa Etkisi”. Gazi
Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yayımlanmış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ankara.
Balcı, S., (2005). “Improving 8th Grade Students‘ Understandin of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plants By
Using 5E Learning Cycle and Conceptual Change Text”. Unpublished Master Thesis. Middle East Technical
University, Ankara.
Bleıcher, R. E., (2005). “Learning The Learning Cycle: The Differantial Effect on Elementary Preservise
Teachers”.School Science and Mathematics.105(2), 61-72.
Bruner, J.S., (1972). Models of The Educational Researcher
Büyüköztürk, Ş., (2001). Deneysel Desenler: Ön Test Son Test Kontrol Gruplu Desen. Pegema Yayıncılık, Ankara.
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş., Ve
Bybee, R.W., (1997). Improving İnstruction. In Achieving Scientific Literacy: From Purposes To Practice.
Portsmouth, Nh: Heinemann.
Caine, R. N., & Caine, G. (1990). "Understanding A Brain Based Approach To Learning And Teaching."
Educational Leadership, 48(2), 66-70.
Campbell, M.A., (2000). “The Effects Of The 5e Learning Cycle Model On Students’ Understanding Of Force And
Motion Concepts”. Ms Thesis. University Of Central Florida.
Carin, A. A. & Bass, J.E., (2001). Teaching Science As Inguiry. New Jersey, Ninth Edition. Prentice-Hall, Upper
Saddle River.
Demirel, F. (2008). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Pegema Yayıncılık”, Ankara.
Ergin, G., Ünsal, Y. & Tan M. (2006). “5e Modeli‘Nin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarısına Ve Tutum Düzeylerine
Etkisi”: Yatay Atış Hareketi. Örneği. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 7 (2), 1-15.
Hançer, A. H., (2005). “Fen Eğitiminde Yapılandırmacı Yaklaşıma Dayalı Bilgisayar Destekli Öğrenmenin
Öğrenme Ürünlerine Etkisi”, Doktora Tezi. Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
Lawson, A. E., (2001). “Using The Learning Cycle To Teach Biology Concepts And Reasoning Patterns”. Journal
Of Biological Education, 35 (4), 165–169.
Lord, T. R., (1999). “A Comparison Between Traditional And Constructivist Teaching İn Enviromental Science”.
The Journal Of Enviromental Education, 30 (3), 22–28.
Lorsbach, A. W., (2006). “The Learning Cycle As A Tool For Planning Science Instruction”.
Http://Www.Coe.İlstu.Edu/Scienceed/Lorsbach/257lrcy.Htm. (11.04.2010)
Meb (2005). Ortaöğretim Matematik Ders Programı, Www.Meb.Gov.Tr. (11.04.2010).
Piaget, J., (1992). To Understand İs To Invent. Newyork, Grossman
Selçuk, Z., (2002). Gelişim Ve Öğrenme, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara.
Turgut, F. & Diğerleri. (1997). İlköğretim Fen Öğretimi, Yök/ Db Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Hizmet Öncesi
Öğretmen Eğitimi Yayınları, Ankara.
Özsevgeç, T., (2007). “İlköğretim 5. Sınıf Kuvvet Ve Hareket Ünitesine Yönelik 5E Modeline Göre Geliştirilen
Rehber Materyallerin Etkililiklerinin Belirlenmesi” Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi
Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
Uzun, N., (2002). “Ortaöğretim Biyoloji Programında Genetik Konularının Değerlendirilmesi Ve Öğrencilerin
Genetiğe İlişiğinin Saptanması”, H.Ü Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Bilim Uzmanlığı Tezi
Wılder, M., Shuttleworth, P., (2005). “Cell Inquiry: A 5e Learning Cycle Lesson. Science Activities”. Winter,
Vol:41,No:4,37-43.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com