Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

GLUTARALDEHİTİN ÇEŞİTLİ YOĞUNLUK DERECELERİNİN VE POLİKARBOKSİLAT SİMANININ ETKİNLİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT GLUTARALDEHYDE CONCENTRATIONS AND POLYCARBOXYLATE CEMENT

Journal Name:

  • İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 1993

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In this study, the effects of glutaraldehyde concentrations, % 5 - %3 - % 1 andpolycarboxylate cement - zinc oxide eugenol were compared. 60 primary molars were evaluated clinically and radiographically for 4 months; and 12 teeth were examined histologically 4 weeks postoperatively. No significant differences were found in clinical and radiologic results. However, in the histologic observations, İt was seen that glutaraldehyde at%5 concentration and polycarboxylate cement have caused less inflammation in pulp than the other groups.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışmada, süt azılarında gerçekleştirilen glutaral-dehit amputasyon tedavilerinde % 5 - % 3 - % l'lik glutaral-dehit yoğunluk derecelerinin ve polikarboksilat simanı -Çinko oksit Öjenolun etkileri karşılaştırıldı. 60 süt azısı klinik ve radyolojik olarak 4 ay süre ile; 12 süt azısı ise 1 ay sonra çekilerek histolojik olarak değerlendirildi. Klinik ve radyolojik bulgularda anlamlı farklılıklar saptanmadı. Ancak, histolojik incelemelerde glutaraldehitin % 5 yoğunluk derecesinin ve polikarboksilat simanmın pulpada diğer gruplara göre daha az iltihap oluşturduğu gözlendi
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-glutaraldehitin-cesitli-yogunluk-derecelerinin-polikarboksilat-simaninin-etkinliklerinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf
  • 2
147
154
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1.Aktören
, O.: Süt dişi amputasyon tedavisinde çeşitli madde ve tekniklerin karşılaştırılması. Doktora tezi, 1988, İstanbul.
2. Beaver, H.A., Kopel, H.M., Sabes, W.R.: The effect of zinc oxide eugenol cement on a formocresolized pulp. J.Dent.Chdd., 1966; 33:381-96.
3. Block, R.M., Lewis, R.D., Hirsch, J., Coffey, J., Lange-land, K.: Systemic distribution of labelled paraformaldehyde incorporated within formocresol following pulpotomies in dogs./. Endod. 9:1983; 176-178.
4. Boller, R.J.: Reactions of pulpotomİzed teeth to zinc oxide and formocresol-type drugs. J. Dent. Child., 1972; 39: 52-60.
5. Davis, M.J., Myers, R., Switkes, M.D.: Glutaraldehyde; an alternative to formocresol for vital pulp therapy, J. Dent. Child., 1982; 49:176-180.
6. El-Kafrawy, Dİckey, K., Mitchell, P.: Pulp reaction to a polycarboxylate cement in monkeys. /. Dent. Res., 1974; S3: 15-19.
7. Fuks, A.B., Bimstein, E., Michaeli, Y.: Glutaraldehyde as
154
O. Aktören, K. Gençay, N. Savcı
a pulp dressing after pulpotomy in primary teeth of baboon monkeys, Pediatr. Dent., 1986; 8: 32-36.
8. Fuks, A.B., Bimstein, E., Guelmann, M., Klein, H.: Asses-ment of a 2 percent buffered glutaraldehyde solution in pulpoto-mized primary teeth of school children. J. Dent. Child., 1990; 57: 371-375.
9. Garcia-Godoy, F.: A comparison between zinc oxide-eu-genol and polycarboxylate cement on formocresol pulpotomies, /. Pedod., 1982; 6: 203-217.
10. Garcia-Godoy, F.: Clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde pulpotomies in primary teeth, Acta. Odontol. Pediatr., 1983; 4: 41-44.
11. Garcia-Godoy, F.: A 42 month clinical evaluation of glutaraldehyde pulpotomies in primary teeth./. Pedod., 1986; 10: 148-155.
12. Hannah, D.R., Rowe, AH.: Vital pulpotomy of deciduous molars using N2 and other materials. Br. Dent.J^ 1971; 130: 99-107.
13. Hansen, H.P., Rawn, J.J., Ulrich, D.: Vital pulpotomy in primary molars. A clinical and histologic investigation of the effect of zinc oxide-eugenol cement and ledermix, Scand.J. Dent. Res., 1971; 79:13-23.
14. Hill, S.D., Berry, C.W., Seale, N.S., Kaga, M.: Comparison of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of glutaraldehyde and formocresol. Oral Surg. OralMed. Oral Pathol., 1991; 71: 89¬95.
15. Kopel, H.M., Bernick, S., Zachrisson, E., De Romero, S.A.: The effects of glutaraldehyde on primary pulp tissue following coronal amputation: An in vivo histologic study, /. Dent. Child., 1980; 47: 425-430.
16. Lewis, B.B., CUestner, S.B.: Formaldehyde in dentistry; A review of mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. /. Am. Dent. Assoc., 1981; 103: 429-431.
17. Magnusson, B.: Therapeutic pulpotomy in primary molars-clinical and histological follow-up. Zinc oxide-eugenol as wound dressing, Odontol. Revy, 1971; 22: 45-54.
18. Ranly, DM.: The effect of pH and concentration on the glutaraldehyde fixation of bovine pulp, Acta Odontol. Pediatr., 1983; 4: 45-47.
19. Ranly, D.M., Lazzari, E.P.: A biochemical study of two bifunctional reagents as alternatives to formocresol, /. Dent. Des., 1983; 62: 1054-1057.
20. Ranly, D.M.: Formocresol toxicity. Current knowledge, Acta Odontol. Pediatr., 1984; 5:93-98.
21. Ranly, D.M.: Assesment of the systemic distribution and toxicity of formaldehyde following pulpotomy treatment, /. Dent.Child., 1985; 52: 431-434.
22. Ranly, D.M., Garcia-Godoy, F.: The diffusion of glutaraldehyde from zinc oxide eugenol, Pediatr. Dent., 1985; 7: 215-217.
23. Safer, N., Avery, B., Cox, C: Histopathologic evaluation of the effects of new polycarboxylate cements on monkey pulps. Oral Surg., 1972; 33: 966-975.
24. S. Gravenmade, E.J.: Some biochemical considerations of fixation in endodontics./. Endod., 1975; 1: 233-237.
25. Tagger, E., Tagger, M.: Pulpal and periapical reactions to glutaraldehyde and paraformaldehyde pulpatomy dressing İn monkeys./. Endod., 1984; 10: 364-371.
26. Tagger, E., Tagger, M., Sarnat, H.: Pulpal reactions to glutaraldehyde and paraformaldehyde pulpotomy dressings in monkey primary teeth. Endod. Dent. Traumatol., 1986; 2: 237¬242.
27. Truelove, A., Mitchel, P.: Biologic evaluation of a cor-boxylate cement J. Dent. Res., 1971; 50:166-169.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com