1. Zubery Y ve ark.
Immediate loading of modual transitional implants: a histologic and histomorphometric study in dogs. International Journal of Periodontics and Restorative Dentistry, 1999; 19: 343-53.
2. Balkin BE, Steflik DE, Naval F. Minidental implant insertion with the auto-advance technique for ongoing applications. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2001; 27: 32-7.
3. Krennmair G, Weinlander M, Schidinger S. Provisional implants for anchoring removable interim prostheses in edentulous jaws: a clinical study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2003; 18: 582-88.
4. Leshem D ve ark. A simple technique for fabrication of immediate interim removable prosthesis supported by transitional implants. Implant Dentistry, 2003; 12: 227-29.
5. Stegaroiu R ve ark. Influence of restoration type on stress distribution in bone around implants: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1998; 13: 82-90.
6. Kunavisarut C ve ark. Finite element analysis on dental implant-supported prostheses without passive fit. Journal of Prosthodontics, 2002; 11:
30-40.
7. Adell R ve ark. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. International Journal of Oral
Surgery, 1981; 10: 387-416.
8. Lozada JL ve ark. Comparative three dimensional analysis of two finite-element endosseous implant designs. Journal of Oral Implantology, 1994; 20: 315-21.
9. Branemark PI. Osseointegration and its experimental background. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1983; 50: 399-410.
10. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 1996; 7: 143-52.
11. Morgan MJ, James DF, Pilliar RM. Fractures of the fixture component of an osseointegrated implant. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1993; 8: 409-14.
12. Yokoyama S ve ark. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry, 2004; 91: 234-40.
13. Sertgöz A, Güvener S. Finite element analysis of the effect of cantilever and implant length on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 1996; 76: 165-69.
14. Akca, K, Iplikcioglu H. Finite element stress analysis of the effect of short implant usage in place of cantilever extensions in mandibular posterior edentulism. Journal of Oral
Rehabilitation 2002; 29: 350-56.
15. Bahat O. Treatment planning and placement of implants in the posterior maxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Implants, 1993; 8: 151-61.
16. van Steenberghe D ve ark. Applicability of osseointegrated oral implants in the rehabilitation of partial edentulism: a prospective multicenter study on 558 fixtures. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Implants, 1990; 5: 272-81.
17. Scurria MS ve ark. Prognostic variables associated with implant failure: a retrospective effectiveness study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 1998; 13: 400¬6.
18. Pilliar RM ve ark. Dental implant design: Effect on bone remodeling. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 1991; 25: 467-83.
19. Brunski JB. Biomechanical considerations in dental implant design. International Journal of Oral Implantology, 1988; 5: 31-4.
20. Holmgren EP ve ark. Evaluating parameters of osseointegrated dental implants using finite element analysis-a twodimensional comparative study examining the effects of implant diameter, implant shape, and load direction. Journal of
Oral Implantology, 1998; 24: 80-8.
Mini implantların Protetik Kullanım Alanları ve Avantajları
21. Meijer HJ ve ark. Stress distribution around dental implants: influence of superstructure, length of implants, and height of mandible. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry,1992; 68: 96¬102.
22. Iplikcioglu H, Akca K. Comparative evaluation of the effect of diameter, length and number of implants supporting three-unit fixed partial prostheses on stress distribution in the bone. Journal of Dentistry, 2002; 30: 41-6.
23. Himmlova L ve ark. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. Journal of Prosthetic
Dentistry, 2004; 91: 20-25.
24. Quek CE, Tan KB, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue performance of a single-tooth implant abutment system: effect of diameter. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 2006; 21:
929-36.
25. Allum SR, Tomlinson RA, Joshi R. The impact of loads on standard diameter, small diameter and mini implants: a comparative laboratory
29
study. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2008;
19: 553-9.
26. Romeo E ve ark. Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants,
2004; 19: 247-59.
27. Zinsli B ve ark. Clinical evaluation of small diameter ITI implants: a prospective study. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial
Implants, 2004; 19: 92-9.
28. Flanagan D ve ark. Measurement of the fatigue life of mini dental implants: a pilot study. Journal of Oral Implantology, 2008; 34: 7-11.
29. Serra G ve ark. Sequential bone healing of immediately loaded mini-implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2008; 134: 44-52.
30. Christensen GJ. Critical appraisal. Mini implants: good or bad for long-term service? Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry,
2008; 20: 343-8.
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com
