Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

INTERPRETATION OF UNKNOWN AND VARIABLE PRIOR TO FORMAL ALGEBRAIC INSTRUCTION

CEBİR ÖĞRETİMİNE GEÇİŞTE BİLİNMEYEN VE DEĞİŞKEN KAVRAMLARININ YORUMLANMASI

Journal Name:

  • Kastamonu Üniversitesi Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2013

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Bu çalışmanın amacı, altıncı sınıf öğrencilerinin cebir öğretimine geçiş aşamasında bilinmeyen ve değişken kavram kullanımlarını nasıl kullandığını incelemektir. Üç öğrenciye, bilinmeyen ve değişken kavramlarını içeren bir ölçek sunulmuştur. Sonuçlar, denklem çözme ve örüntü bulma gibi cebirsel ifadelerde, öğrencilerin bilinmeyen ve değişken kavramlarını bilinmeyen olarak algıladıklarını göstermektedir.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
The purpose of the study is to investigate the sixth grade students’ use of unknowns and variables prior to any formal algebraic instruction. Three students were presented with a questionnaire including the manipulation of unknowns and variables. The students showed the ability to interpret algebraic expressions such as solving equations and finding patterns. It is a crucial point that they defined both of the term of unknown and variable as unknown. In this study it was examined the grounds of this use.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-interpretation-unknown-and-variable-prior-formal-algebraic-instruction.pdf
  • 4
1317
1326
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Kieran,C.,(2006). Research on the learning and teaching of algebra. In A.Gutierrez &
P.Boero (Eds.), Handbook of Research on the Psychology of Mathematics Education:
Past, Present and Future (pp. 11-49). Rotterdam: Sense Publisher.
2. Herscovics,N., Linchevski,L.(1994).A cognitive gap between arithmetic and algebra.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(1), 59–7.
3. Trigueros, M, Ursini, S. (2003). First-year undergraduates’ difficulties in working with
different uses of variable. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, (Eds.) Research
in Collegiate Mathematics Education (CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, Vol. 12,
pp.1-29). Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.
Interpretation Of Unknown And Variable Prior To Formal Algebraic ... 1325
October 2013 Vol:21 No:4 (Special Issue) Kastamonu Education Journal
4. Usiskin, Z. (1988). Conceptions of school algebra and uses of variables. In A. Coxford &
A. P. Schulte (Eds.), The ideas of algebra, K-12 (1988 Yearbook: pp. 8-19). Reston, VA:
NCTM.
5. Chalouh,L. & Herscovics, N. (1988). Teaching algebraic expressions in a meaningful
way. In A.E.Coxford (Ed.), The ideas of algebra, K-12(1988 Yearbook, pp.33-42). Reston,
VA: NCTM.
6. Stacey, K. & MacGregor, M. (2000). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems.
Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18 (2), 149-167.
7. Foster, D. (2007). Making meaning in algebra examining students’ understandings and
misconceptions. In A.H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Assessing Mathematical Proficiency (MSRI
Publications , Vol. 53, pp163-176). NY: Cambridge University Press.
8. English, L. D. & Warren, E. A. (1999). Introducing the variable through pattern exploration.
In B. Moses (Ed.), Algebraic Thinking, grades K-12: readings from NCTM’s schoolbased
journals and other publications, (pp. 141-145). Reston, VA: NCTM.
9. Zazkis,R. & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: the tension between algebraic
thinking and algebraic notation. Educational studies in mathematics, 49, 379-402.
10. Lee, L. (1996). An initiation algebraic culture through generalization activities. In N. Bednarz,
C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to Algebra. Perspectives for research and
teaching (pp. 87-106). Dordrecht : Kluwer.
11. Radford, L. (1996). Some reflections on the teaching algebra through generalization. In
N. Bednarz, C. Kieran & L. Lee (Eds.), Approaches to Algebra. Perspectives for research
and teaching (pp. 107-111). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Patton,M .Q.(2002).Qualitative research and evaluation methods(6th ed.), Thousand
Oaks, CA : Sage.
13. Borko,H. & Livingston,C. (1989). Cognition and Improvisation: Differences in Mathematics
Instruction by Expert and Novice Teachers .American Educational Research Journal,
26(4).pp. 473-498.
14. Herscovics,N. & Kieran, C. (1999). Constructing meaning for the concept of equation.
Introducing the variable through pattern exploration. In B. Moses (Ed.), Algebraic Thinking,
grades K-12: readings from NCTM’s school-based journals and other publications,
(pp. 181-188). Reston, VA: NCTM.
15. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı. (2005). Ilköğretim matematik
dersi öğretim programı ve kılavuzu (1-5. sınıflar). Ankara: Devlet Kitapları Müdürlüğü.
16. Herbert, K. & Brown, R.H. (1999). Pattern as tools for algebraic reasoning. In B. Moses
(Ed.), Algebraic Thinking, grades K-12: readings from NCTM’s school-based journals
and other publications, (pp. 123-128). Reston, VA: NCTM.
17. Stacey,K. & MacGregor, M. (1999). Ideas about symbolism that students bring to algebra.
In B. Moses (Ed.), Algebraic Thinking, grades K-12: readings from NCTM’s school-based
journals and other publications, (pp. 308-312). Reston, VA: NCTM.
18. Aktaş,Ş., Atalay,A., Aygun,S., Aynur,N., Bilge,O, Celik,M., Çuha, Karaman,U., Öcal,İ.,
Öncü,F., Özçelik,U., Uluğbay,M., Ünsal,N. (2006). İlköğretim matematik 6 ders kitabı,
Ankara: Devlet Kitapları.
1326 Meriç ÖZGELDİ ...
Ekim 2013 Cilt:21 No:4 (Özel Sayı) Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi
19. Wagner, S. (1999). What are these things called variables? Ideas about symbolism that
students bring to algebra. In B. Moses (Ed.), Algebraic Thinking, grades K-12: readings
from NCTM’s school-based journals and other publications, (pp. 316-320). Reston, VA:
NCTM.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com