Fonksiyon Kavramı: Tanımsal Bilginin Kavramın Çoklu Temsillerine Transfer Edilebilmesi ve Bazı Kavram Yanılgıları

Akkoç, H.
(2003)
. Students' understanding of the core concept of function. Unpublished EdD Thesis, University of Warwick, UK.
Akkoç, H. (2005). Fonksiyon kavramının anlaşılması: Çoğul temsiller ve tanımsal özellikler. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi (Eurasian Journal of Educational Research), 5(20), 14-24.
Akkoç, H. (2006). Fonksiyon kavramının çoklu temsillerinin çağrıştırdığı kavram görüntüleri. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (H.U. Journal of Education), 30, 1-10.
Altun, M. (1999). Anadolu
Üniversites
i Açıköğretim Fakültesi İlköğretim Öğretmenliği Lisans Tamamlama Programı Matematik Eğitimi. Prof. Dr. Aynur Özdaş (Ed), 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10. Bölümler. Eskişehir: Açıköğretim Fakültesi Yayınları, No: 591, ISBN. 975-492¬825-8.
Bakar, M. & Tall, D. (1992). Students mental prototypes for functions and graphs.
International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 23(1),39-50.
Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E.,
Hawks
, J. & Nichols, D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. Educational Studies in
Mathematics, 23(3), 247-285.
Brenner, M. E. Ve diğ. (1997). Learning by understanding: the role of multiple representations in learning algebra.
American Educational Research Journal, 34(4), 663-689.
Confrey, J. (1994). Splitting, similarity and rate of change: a new approach to multiplication and exponential functions. In G.Harel & J. Confrey, (Eds.) The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics, 291-330. Albany, NY: State University of New York.
102
• •I
Pamukkale University Journal of Education, Number 31 (January 2012/1)
Fonksiyon Kavramı: Tanımsal Bilginin Kavramın Çoklu Temsillerine Transfer Edilebilmesi ve Bazı Kavram Yanılgıları
Confrey, F. & Smith, E. (1991). A framework for functions: prototypes, multiple representations and transformations. In R.G.
Underhil
l (Ed.), Proceedings ofThe 13th Annual Meeting of The North American Chapter of The International Group For The Psychology of Mathematics Education, 57-63, Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Clement, L. (2001). What do students really know about functions?. The Mathematics Teacher, 94(9),
745-748.
Dede, Y., Bayazit, İ. ve Soybaş, D. (2010). Öğretmen adaylarının denklem, fonksiyon ve polinom kavramlarını anlamaları. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 18(1), 67-88.
Even, R. (1993). Subject-matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: prospective secondary teachers and the function concept. Journal for Research in Mmathematics Education, 24(2), 94-116.
Gaea, L., Orit, Z. & Kay. S. (1990). Functions, graphs and graphing: tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational Research. 60(1),
1-64.
Geuther G. K. & Ferrini-Mundy, J. (1990). Functions and their representations. Mathematics Teacher,
83(3), 209-216.
Hauge, S. K. (1993). Functions and relations: some applications from database management for the teaching of classroom mathematics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No.
ED 365 519).
Kabael, U. T. (2010). Fonksiyon
kavramı:Tarih
i gelişimi, öğrenilme süreci, öğrenci yanılgıları ve öğretim stratejileri, Tübav Bilim Dergisi, 3(1), 128-136.
Kaput, J. (1992). Patterns in students' formalization of quantitative patterns. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds), The concept of function: aspects of epistemology and pedagogy.
Mathematical Association of America Notes, 25, 290¬317.
Keller, B. A.
&
Hirsch, C. R.
(1998)
. Student preferences for representations of functions. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 29 (1), 1-17.
Leinhardt, G., Zaslavsky, O. & Stein, M. K. (1990). Functions, graphs, and graphing: tasks, learning, and teaching. Review of Educational
Research, 60(1), 1-64.
Malara N.A & Iaderosa, R (1999), Theory and Practice: a case of fruitful relationship for the renewal of the teaching and learning of algebra, Proceedings of CIEAEM 50, 38-54.
Malik, M A. (1980). Historical and pedagogical aspects of the definition of function.
International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science
& Technology, 11(4), 489-92.
Meel, D. E (1999). Prospective teachers' understandings: function and composite function. Issues in the Undergraduate Preparation of School Teachers: The Journal, 1.
Montiel, M., Vidakovic, D. & Kabael, T. (2008). Relationship between students' understanding of functions in cartesian and polar coordinate systems. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 1(2), 52-70.
Sajka, M. (2003). A secondary school student understands of the concept of function -a case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 53,
229-254.
Sierpinska, A. (1992). On understanding the notion of function (ed. E. Dubinsky, G. Harel). The Concept of Function: Aspects of Epistemology and Pedagogy. Mathematical Association of America Notes, 25, 25-58.
Tall, D. & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and concept definition in mathematics, with special reference to limits and continuity.
Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 151-169.
Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the undergraduate curriculum. In E. Dubinsky, A. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.),
Research in Collegiate Mathematics Education, I, CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 4, 21-44.
Ural, A. (2006). Fonksiyon öğreniminde kavramsal zorluklar. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 7(2), 75-94.
Vinner, S.
(1983)
. Concept definition, concept image and the notion of function. International Journal for Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 14
(3), 293-305.
Vinner, S. & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and definitions for the concept of function.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(4),
356-366.
Yıldırım ve Şimşek (2006). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.