Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

TEMEL EĞİTİMDE DURUMLU ÖĞRENME ORTAMLARININ DÜZENLENMESİ

Journal Name:

  • Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2000
Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In education, behaviorists concentrate on outcomes. These outcomes might be defined as observable and measurable changes in human behavior. The goal of primary education is not only to change the human behavior, but also attitude change. Attitude researchers who investigate an intangible process are often ignored by behavioral scientists. Attitudes are intangible tendencies which guide the behaviors of students. On the other hand, cognitive theory, constructivism, and situated learning are process oriented and they explain attitude changes much more effectively than does behaviorism. Situated learning is derived from situated cognition focusing on attitudes. Situated learning is the learning of knowledge, skill and attitude in a context. This context could be an authentic context or a virtual copy of that context. Authentic context which provides with students the use of abstract knowledge in the concrete environments. Designing situated learning environments in elementary classrooms makes the learning more effective
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Eğitimde davranışçılar doğrudan öğretim çıktıları üzerinde odaklanırlar. Bu çıktılar insan davranışlarındaki gözlenebilen ve ölçülebilen değişim olarak tanımlanabilir. Ancak temel eğitimin amacı yalnız davranış değişikliği gerçekleştirmek değildir. Temel eğitiminin amaçları arasında tutum değişikliği de yer almaktadır. Tutuma yönelik araştırmalar ise, davranışçıların pek önemsemediği, gözle görülmeyen süreçler üzerinde yoğunlaşmaktadır. Tutumlar öğrenciyi yönlendiren ve gözle görülemeyen eğilimlerdir. Bilişsel kuram, yapıcılık ve durumlu öğrenme ise sürece yönelik yaklaşımlardır ve bu kuramlar tutum değişikliğini davranışçı yaklaşıma göre daha etkili bir şekilde açıklamaktadır. Tutumlar üzerine yoğunlaşan durumlu öğrenme, durumlu biliş kavramından ortaya çıkmıştır. Durumlu öğrenme; bir bağlam içinde bilgi, beceri ve tutumların öğrenilmesidir. Bu bağlam gerçek ya da sanal ortamlar olabilir. Temel eğitimde eksikliği en fazla hissedilen gerçek dünya bağlamı, öğrencilerin soyut bilgileri somut ortamlarda kullanabilmelerine olanak sağlar. Durumlu öğrenme ortamlarının temel eğitim sınıflarında düzenlenmesi öğrenmeyi daha etkin bir hale getirebilir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-temel-egitimde-durumlu-ogrenme-ortamlarinin-duzenlenmesi.pdf
  • 1
21-28
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

Brown, J. S., Collinns, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-42.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1993). Stolen knowledge. Educational Technology, 33 (3), 10-15.
Brown, S. B., & Duguid, P. (1994). Practice at the periphery: A reply to Steven Tripp. Educational Technology, 34 (10), 9-21.
Casey, C. (1996). Incorporating cognitive apprenticeship in multi-media. Educational Technology Research & Development, 44 (1), 71-84.
Chiou, G. F. (1995). Learning rationaties and virtual reality in education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 23 (4), 327-336.
Choi, J. I., & Hannafin, M. (1995). Situated cognition and learning environments: Roles, structures, and implications for design. Educational Technology Research & Development, 43 (2), 53¬69.
Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In L. Idel & B. F. Jones
(Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 121-138) New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Collins, A. (1994). Goal-based scenarios and the problem of situated learning: A commentary on
Andersen Consulting's design of goal-based scenarios. Educational Technology, 33 (11), 30-32.
Damarin, S. K. (1993). Schooling and situated knowledge: Travel or tourism? Educational Technology, 33 (3), 27-32.
Griffin, M. M. (1995). You can't get from here: Situated learning, transfer, and map skills. Contemporary Educational
Psychology, 20 (1), 65-87.
Harley, S. (1993). Situated learning and classroom instruction. Educational Technology, 33 (3), 46-51.
Hay, K. E. (1993). Legitimate peripheral participation, instructionism, and constructivism: Whose situation is it
anyway? Educational Technology, 33 (3), 33-38.
Hay, K. E. (1994). The three activities of a student: A reply to Tripp. Educational Technology, 34
(10), 22-27.
Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Thinking technology. Educational Technology, 33 (1), 35-37.
Kumar, D. D. (1995). Intelligent educational systems for anchored instruction? Techtrends,40 (1), 33-3.
Lehman, J.D, Newby, T. J., Russell, J. D., Stepich, D. A. (1996). Instructional technology for
teaching and learning. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. McLennan, H. (Ed.). (1996). Situated learning perspectives. New Jersey: Educational Technology
Publications.
Moore, J. L., Lin, X., Schwartz, D. L., Petrosino, A., Hickey, D. T., Campbell, O., Hmelo, C., &
Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1994). The relationship between situated cognition and anchored instruction: A response to Tripp. Educational Technology, 34 (10), 28-32.
Picard, L. C. (1993). Intentionality and instructional design: Revisiting key issues and their implications. Educational
Technology, 33 (12), 23-28.
Streibel, M. J. (1991). Instructional plans and situated learning. In G. J. Aglin (Ed.), Instructional
technology (pp.117-131). New Jersey: Libraries Unlimited. Streibel, M. J. (1993). Quaries about computer education and situated critical pedagogy. Educational
Technology, 33 (3), 22-26. Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions. New York: Cambridge University Press. Wegner, J. L. E. (1991). Situated learning legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt (1990). Anchored instruction and its relationship
to situated cognition. Educational Researcher, 19 (8), 2-10. The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1992). The casper series as an example of
anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational
Psychologist, 27 (3), 291-315.
The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1993). Toward integrated curricula: Possibilities from anchored
instruction. In W. Robinowitz (Ed.), Cognitive science foundations of instruction (pp.33-55). New Jersey: Erlbaum.
Tripp, S. D. (1993). Theories, traditions, and situated learning. Educational Technology, 33 (3), 71-77.
Winn, W. (1993). Instructional design and situated learning: Paradox or partnership? Educational Technology, 33 (3), 16-21.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com