Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

PREFERENCES ON INTERNET BASED LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS IN STUDENT-CENTERED EDUCATION

Journal Name:

  • The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education

Publication Year:

  • 2008

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
Nowadays, educational systems are being questionned to find effective solutions to problems that are being encountered, and discussions are centered on the ways of restructuring systems so as to overcome difficulties. As the consequences of the traditional teaching approach, we can indicate that the taught material is not longlasting but easily forgotten, that students do not sufficiently acquire the knowledge and skills that are aimed at developing, and that students lack transferring their knowledge to real life. In our current situation, individuals prefer to use educational resources where and when they want, based on their individual skills and abilities. Throughout the world, because the internet infrastructure has developed quite rapidly, it has been offered as an alternative way for a rich learning and teaching environment. This study aims at determining teacher candidates’ preferences regarding internetbased learning environments in student-centered education by involving the teacher candidates enrolled at Osmangazi University, Faculty of Education, Primary School Teaching, Mathematics Teaching and Computer and Educational Technologies Education programmes. This study is a descriptive study. The data collection scale consists of the “Constructivist Internet-based Education of Science Scale (CILES-S)”. The sample group of teacher candidates in the study showed differences with respect to their preferences regarding internet-based learning in student-centered education. The candidates scored higher in the internet-based learning environments of Cognitive Development and Critical Judgement. The lowest average scores of the sample group were observed in the internet-based learning environment of Episthemologic awareness.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-preferences-internet-based-learning-environments-student-centered-education.pdf
  • 4
154-174
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Wen, M. L.; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Lin, Hung-Ming; Chuang, Shih-Chyueh. (2004).
Cognitive-Metacognitive and Content-Technical Aspects of Constructivist Internet-
Based Learning Environments: A LISREL Analysis. Computers and Education, 43 (3),
237-248.
De La Harpe, B., Kulski, M. and Radloff, A. (1999). How Best to Document The Quality
of Our Teaching and Our Students’ Learning? In: Martin, K., Stanley, N. and Davison, N.,
Editors,Teaching in The Disciplines: Learning in Context. Proceedings of The Eighth
Annual Teachin Learning Forum, The University of Western Australia. University of
Western Australia, Perth.
173
Deryakulu, D. (2000). Yapıcı Öğrenme. Sınıfta Demokrasi. Editör: Şimşek, A. (sayfa: 53-
77) Ankara: Eğitim Sen Yayınları. [Constructive leraning. Democracy in schoolroom. In:
Simsek, A. Editor. (p:53–77). Ankara.].
Gibbs, G. (1992). Assessing More Students. Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
Giles, J., Ryan, Daniel A.J., Belliveav, G., De Freitas, E., Casy, R. (2006). Teaching Style
and Learning in a Quantitative Classroom (EJ74429). Active Learning in Higher
Education: The Journal of the Institute for Learning and Teaching. 7 (3), 213–225.
Hannafin M.J. and Land S.M. (1997). The Foundations and Assumptions of Technology
Enhanced Student-Centered Learning Environments, Instructional Science 25 (3), 167–
202.
Isman, A. (2005). Ogretim Teknolojileri ve Materyal Gelistirme. II. baskı Sempati.
Ankara. [Teaching Technology and Material Development. Ankara.].
Katz, R.N. (1999). Dancing with the devil: Information technology and the new
competition in higher education. Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
Lee, Min-Hsien and Tsai, Chin-Chung (2005). Exploring High School Students’ and
Teachers’ Preferences toward the Construcctivist Internet-based Learning
Environments İn Taiwan. Educational Studies, 31 (2), 149-167.
Means, (1994). Introduction: Using Technology to Advance Educational Goals. In: B.
Means, Editor, Technology and Education Reform: The Reality Behind The Promise,
Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Oblinger, D. G., and Maruyama M. K. (1996). Distributed Learning. Boulder, CO: Cause
Professional Paper Series, 14.
Ozcelik, D. Ali. (1989). Test Hazırlama Kılavuzu. İkinci Baskı. Ankara: OSYM Egitim
Yayinlari 5. [Test Preparation Guide. Ankara:OSYM press.].
Ozdamar, K. (2002). Paket Programlari ile Istatiksel Veri Analizi I. 4. baskı. Eskisehir:
Kaan Kitabevi. [Statistical Data Analysis with Package. Eskişehir].
Peng, Hsinyi; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Wu, Ying-Tien. (2006). University Students' Self-
Efficacy and Their Attitudes Toward the Internet: The Role of Students' Perceptions of
the Internet. Educational Studies, 32 (1), 73-86.
Sellers, Rebecca G.; Wright, Kenneth E.; Wright, Vivian H. (2003). Attitudes and
Perceptions of On- and Off-Campus Students of an Internet-Based Graduate Allied
Health Program.
Tsai, Chin-Chung. (2004). Beyond Cognitive and Metacognitive Tools: The Use of the
Internet as an Epistemological Tool for Instruction. British Journal of Educational
Technology, 35 (5), 525-536.
174
Wen, Meichun Lydia; Tsai, Chin-Chung; Lin, Hung-Ming; Chuang, Shih-Chyueh. (2004).
Cognitive-Metacognitive and Content-Technical Aspects of Constructivist Internet-
Based Learning Environments: A LISREL Analysis. Computers and Education, 43 (3),
237-248.
Yasar, S. (1998). Yapısalci kuram ve ogrenme-ogretme süreci. VII. Ulusal Eğitim
Bilimleri Kongresi (9-11 Eylül)-I. (sayfa:695-699). Konya: Selçuk Universitesi.
[Constructivist theory and learning-teaching process. VII. National Conference of
Education Science (9-11 Eylül)-I. (p: 695-699). Konya: Selcuk University.].
Http://www.vathena.arc.nasa.gov . 06.12. 2006

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com