Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Opinions of Primary School Science and Technology Teachers about Developing Students’ Affective Competence

Journal Name:

  • Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry

Publication Year:

  • 2012

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The present study aimed to determine the primary school secondary level science and technology teachers‟ opinions about developing students‟ affective competence. It was designed as case study with qualitative research method. The participants of the study consisted of 19 science and technology teachers with at least five year experience, who works at 14 different state primary school secondary levels in Eskisehir in Turkey. The data of the study was collected through semi-structured interviews with the teachers in March-April 2010. The interview form contained 10 questions and the responses to these questions were analyzed with NVivo8.0 program through content analysis approach. The findings of the study indicated that the Science and Technology teachers agreed on the significance of gaining the affective intelligence to students, however, they had lack of information and skills on this issue. According to the participant teachers, school administrators and teachers have important responsibilities for this issue, so the teachers were in struggle for using various teaching method and techniques to gain this competence. Yet, they felt inadequate about measurement and evaluation.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-opinions-primary-school-science-and-technology-teachers-about-developing-students-affective-competence.pdf
  • 1
36
54
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Adey P., & Shayer, M. (1994). Really raising standards: cognitive intervention and academic achievement. London: Routledge
Akbaş, O. (2004). Türk milli eğitim sisteminin duyuşsal amaçlarının ilköğretim ikinci kademedeki gerçekleşme derecesinin değerlendirilmesi. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara: Gazi Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman. Annesley, F.R., & Putt, L. (1992). The measure of affective development in primary school students. Townsville: James Cook University of North Queensland.
Bacanlı, H. (2009). Duyuşsal davranış eğitimi. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Bıkmaz, F.H. (2001). İlköğretim 4. ve 5. sınıf öğrencilerinin fen bilgisi dersindeki başarılarını etkileyen faktörler. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Ankara Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, January 2012, 3(1)
53
Bilen, M. (2001). Kurumlarda insan ilişkilerinin başarıya etkisi. 2000 Yılında Türk eğitim örgütü ve Yönetimi ulusal sempozyumu. (11-13 Ocak). Ankara. Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D., & Turgut, M. F. (1996). Fizik öğretimi. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. Demirbaş, M., & Yağbasan, R. (2006). Fen bilgisi öğretiminde bilimsel tutumların işlevsel önemi ve bilimsel tutum ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanma çalışması. Uludağ üniversitesi eğitim fakültesi dergisi, 2, 271-299. Edwards, S., & Bowman, M.A. (1996). Promoting student learning through questioning: A study of classroom questions. Journal on excellence in college teaching, 7(2), 3-2. Fensham, P.J. (1985). Science for all. Journal of curriculum studies, 17, 415–435.
Fink, A. (1995). The survey handbook. USA: Sage Publication.
Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill Publishing Company. Gelen, İ., & Beyazıt, N. (2007). Eski ve yeni ilköğretim programları ile ilgili çeşitli görüşlerin karşılaştırılması. Kuram ve uygulamada eğitim yönetimi, 50, 457-476.
Gözütok, F.D. (2008). Eğitim ve şiddet. Ankara: Gazi Kitabevi. Griffit, K.G., & Nguye, A.D. (2005). Are educators prepared to affect the affective domain? National forum of teacher education journal. 16 (3E), 1-4. Gürdal, A., Sahin, F., & Macaroğlu, E. (1996). İlköğretim ikinci kademe öğrencileri için fen bilgisi tutum ölçeği. Öneri, 1(5), 145-155. Hauenstein, A.D. (1998). A conceptual framework for educational objectives: A holistic approach to traditional taxonomies. Lanham, MD: University Press of America Hodson, D. (1998). Teaching and learning science: towards a personalized approach. Buckingham: Open University Press. Katz, L., & Chard, S.C. (2000). Engaging children's minds: the project approach. Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
Kılıç, A. (2002). Duyuşsal alan özellikleri ve bireye kazandırılması. Eğitim araştırmaları dergisi, 8, 153-164.
Köseoğlu, F. (2004). 2004 ilköğretim fen ve teknoloji dersi programı 4-8. sınıf programın getirdiği yenilikler ve temel özellikleri. Bilim ve aklın aydınlığında eğitim dergisi, Sayı: 54-55. http://yayim.meb.gov.tr.
Krajcik, J., Czerniak, C., & Berger, C. (1999). Teaching children science: A project based approach. Boston, MA: Mc Graw-Hill.
Marcum, J.W. (2006). After the information age. A dynamic learning manifesto. New york: Peter Lang Publishing. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M.A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Nussbaum, J.F. (1992). Effective teacher behaviors. Communication education, 41(2), 167-180.
Oruç, M. (1993). İlköğretim okulu II. kademe öğrencilerinin fen tutumları ile fen başarıları arasındaki ilişki. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
Özdemir, S. (2005). Yeni öğretim programı ne getiriyor? Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı
Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, January 2012, 3(1)
54
Patton, M.Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Paykoç, F. (1995). Sosyal bilgiler eğitiminde çağdaş eğilimler. İlköğretim okullarında sosyal bilgiler öğretimi ve sorunları. (pp. 46–68). Ankara: TED Yayınları. Pedretti, E. (2005). STSE education: principles and practices in Aslop S., Bencze L., Pedretti E. (Eds.), Analysing Exemplary Science Teaching: theoretical lenses and a spectrum of possibilities for practice. Open University Press, Mc Graw-Hill Education.
Pajares, M.F. (1992). Teachers‟ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy concept. Review of educational research, 62, 307-332.
Reich, R. (2001). The future of success. New York: Alfred A. Knopf. Rennie, J.L., & Punch, F.K. (1991). The relationship between affect and achievement in science. Journal of research in science teaching, 28(2), 193-209.
Richardson, G., & Blades, D. (2001). Social studies and science education: Developing world citizenship through interdisciplinary partnerships. Canadian social studies. 35(3). www.quasar.ualberta.ca/css. Richmond, V.P., Lane, D.R., & McCroskey, J.C. (2006). Teacher immediacy and the teacher-student relationship. In T. P. Mottet, V. P. Richmond, and J. C. McCroskey (Eds.), Handbook of instructional communication: Rhetorical and relational perspectives (pp. 167–193). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Russell, M. (2004). The importance of the affective domain in further education classroom culture. Research in post-compulsory education, 9(2), 249-270. Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. (Eds.) (1994). STS education: International perspectives in reform. New York: Teacher‟s College Press. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage Publications. Walls, R. T., Nardi, A.H., Von Minden, A.M., & Hoffma, N. (2002). The characteristics of effective and ineffective teachers. Teacher education quarterly, Winter 2002, 39-48.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Yin, R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com