Buradasınız

Anasayfa » Content

Learners’ perceptions of technology for design of a collaborative m-learning module

Journal Name:

  • World Journal on Educational Technology

Publication Year:

  • 2010

Key Words:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
In Malaysian schools the learning of science does not reflect the nature of science. An instructional module which could address the need for teaching science through a process of scientific discovery and collaboration is required. A developmental research approach with three phases was used to design a collaborative m-Learning module for a topic in science. In the first phase of analysis, a survey of 158 students’ use of technology and the perception of the use of computers and mobile phones was completed. Data from the analysis phase indicated the students’ readiness in using online tools such as discussion forums and text messaging with mobiles for learning. Computers were perceived to be useful for learning, but mobile phones were not. The findings from the first phase were used to determine the learning tools to utilize in the design of the module in the second phase. The online learning tools used are wikis and discussion forums. In addition, text messaging using the mobile phone was also employed for individualized quizzes. The collaborative m-Learning module designed, was evaluated by experts for further improvements. The findings indicate that the experts agree that a collaborative Learning module with a variety of learning tools such as wikis, discussion forum and text messaging, could be used for teaching science. In addition, this module could also be used for teaching other subjects.
Bookmark/Search this post with
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastrmx_159831_2_pp_169-185.pdf
  • 3
169-185
  • English

REFERENCES

References: 

Abruscato, J. (2000). Teaching children science: A discovery approach. (5th ed.). Needham Heights,
Ma: Allyn & Bacon
Champagne, A. B., & Kouba, V. L. (2005). Writing to inquire: Written products as performance
measures. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.). Assessing science understanding:
A human constructivist view (pp.223-248). London: Elsevier Inc.
Chong, B. P. (2005). Understanding of the nature of science and its relationship with academic
achievement and gender among Form 6 students. Unpublished M. Ed Project paper. University
Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Frick, T., Watson, C., Cullen, T., & Han, S. (2008).5-Star Instructional Design: Evaluation of Web-
Based Instruction in Medical Science.Retrieved on 17th December 2010 from
http://site.educ.indiana.edu/Portals/355/showcase/R690/frickwatsoncullen...
Geddes, S.J. (2004). Mobile learning in the 21st century: benefit for learners. The Knowledge Tree.
Edition 6. Retrieved 20 August, 20, 2006 from http://knowledgetree.flexiblelearning.net.au
/edition06/download/geddes.doc
Greeno, J. G. (1992). Mathematical and scientific thinking in classrooms and other situations. In D.F.
Halpern (Ed.). Enhancing thinking skills in the sciences and mathematics (pp. 39-62). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Guzdial, M., & Turns, J. (2000). Computer-supported collaborative learning in Engineering: The
challenge of scaling-up assessment. In M. J. Jacobson, & R. B. Kozma (Eds.), Innovations in science
and mathematics education: Advance design for technologies of learning (pp. 227-257). Mawah,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Hogan, K. & Fisherkeller, J. (2005). Dialogue as data: Assessing students’ scientific reasoning with
interactive protocols. In J. J. Mintzes, J. H. Wandersee, & J. D. Novak (Eds.), Assessing science
understanding: A human constructivist view (pp.95-127). London: Elsevier Inc.
Karpov, Y. V., & Haywood, H. C. (1998). Two ways to elaborate Vygotsky’s concept of mediation:
Implications for instruction. American Psychologist, 53 (1), 27-36.
Kaye, A. R. (1992). Learning together apart. In A. R. Kaye (ed.), Collaborative learning through
computer conferencing: The Najaden Papers. Vol. F90 Nato ASI Series. Proceedings of the NATO
Dorothy DeWitt & Saedah Siraj / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 169-185
183
Advanced Research Workshop on Collaborative Learning and Computer
Conferencing,Copenhagen, Denmark, July 29- August 3, 1991 (pp.1-24). Berlin Heidelberg,
Germany: Springer-Verlag
Kozma, R. (2003). The material features of multiple representations and their cognitive and social
affordances for science understanding. Learning and Instruction. 13(2), 205-226. Retrieved
May20, 2008 from Proquest Database.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2004). Cooperation and the use of technology. In D. H. Jonassen
(Ed.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (2nd ed.). (pp. 785-
812). Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Lee, C. S. (1999). Collaboration in
networked writing classrooms. Unpublished M. Ed Project paper. University Malaya, Kuala
Lumpur, Malaysia
Ling, Jeannie Ai Yieng (1999). Primary Science curriculum implementation in Malaysia : Inquiry as
hope and practice. University Massey, Palmerston North New Zealand. Unpublished doctorate
dissertation in Collection of doctoral abstracts on education in Malaysia (Koleksi abstrak disertasi
kedoktoran mengenai pendidikan di Malaysia). Education Planning and Research Division,
Ministry of Education Malaysia
Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and
Development, 50(3) 43 - 60.
Ministry of Education. (2002). Curriculum specifications for integrated curriculum for secondary
schools: Science Form 2. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & PustakaNorizan Ahmad (2005).
Pengintegrasian Teknologi dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran sains di sekolah menengah
[Integrating technology in teaching and learning science in secondary schools]. Unpublished
doctoral dissertation. University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur.
Osbourne, J., & Henessy, S. (2003). Literature review in science education and the role of ICT:
Promise, problems and future directions. Bristol, U. K.: Futurelab. Retrieved on 20th July from
http://www.futurelab.org.uk
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (1999). Building learning communities in cyberspace: Effective strategies for
the online classroom. San Franscisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc.Tan J. N. (1999). The development and
implementation if the primary school science curriculum in Malaysia. University of East Anglia,
U.K. Unpublished doctorate dissertation in Collection of doctoral abstracts on education in
Malaysia (Koleksi abstrak disertasi kedoktoran mengenai pendidikan di Malaysia). Education
Planning and Research Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Rossett, A. (1995). Needs Assessment. In G. J. Anglin (Ed.), Instructional technology: Past, present
and future (2nd ed.) (pp.183-196). Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited Inc.
Saedah Siraj. (2005). m-learning dalam pembangunan sekolah berteknologi di Malaysia: Prospek
pelaksanaan. (m-learning in the development for schools with technology in Malaysia:
Implementation prospects). Paper presented at National Seminar on ICT in Education 2005,
Tanjung Malim, 17-19th November.
Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. (2000). The Knowledge Integration Environment: Helping students use the
internet effectively. In M. J. Jacobson, & R. B. Kozma (Eds.) Innovations in science and
mathematics education: Advance design for technologies of learning (pp.193-226). Mawah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
Dorothy DeWitt & Saedah Siraj / World Journal on Educational Technology (2010) 169-185
184
Wang, F. & Hanafin, M. J., (2005). Design-based research and technology enhanced learning
environments. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53 (4), 5-23.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com