You are here

Home » Content

ANGLE SINIFLANDIRMASIN A GORE ORTODONTIK ANOMALİLERİN DAĞILIMI VE FARKLİ TEDAVİ YAKLAŞIMLARI

THE DISTRIBUTION OF ORTHODONTIC ANOMALIES ACCORDING TO ANGLE CLASSIFICATION AND DIFFERENT TREATMENT APPROACHES

Journal Name:

  • Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi

Publication Year:

  • 2001

Key Words:

Keywords (Original Language):

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was carried out in order to determine the anomaly prevalence of 1785 patients who were applied for treatment to our orthodontic clinic. The anomalies of patients were classified as class I, class IT-] - class 1T-2, and ill according to Angles' classification, and different treatment approaches were evaluated. As a result, the percentages of the anomaly classification were found as; 24% class I, 44,2% class 11-1. 9.H% class 11-2,22 class II!.
Bookmark/Search this post with
Abstract (Original Language): 
Bu çalışma ortodonti kliniğimize tedavi amacı ile müracaat eden 1785 hastanın ortodontik anomali prevıılansını değerlendirmek amacı ile yapıldı. Hastalarda mevcut olan anomaliler, Angle sınılİandırmasma göre değerlendirilmiş olup, sınıf T, sınıf II-1, sınıf 11-2, sınıf III anomali olarak simflaridırılmış ve uygulanan farklı tedavi yöntemleri değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuç oiarak hastaların %24'ü sınıf I, (/c44.2\si sınıf 11-1, %9.8'i sınıf 11-2, %22\si sınıf III anomalili olduğu belirlenmiştir.
FULL TEXT (PDF): 
PDF icon arastirmax-angle-siniflandirmasin-gore-ortodontik-anomalilerin-dagilimi-farkli-tedavi-yaklasimlari.pdf
  • 3
45-47
  • Turkish

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Angle EH. Classification of malocclusions. Dental Cosmos 1899;4I: 248-2550.
2. Case CS. Techniques and principles of denial orthopedia. Ncwyork: Leo Brudcr, 1963:16 8
3. Gravely JF, Johnson DB. Angle's classified of malocclusions: An asscsmcnt of reliability, Br J Orthod 1973;1:79-86.
4. Bjöık A, Krcbs AA, Solow B. A method for epidemiological registration of malocclusion. Ada Odontol Scand 1964:22:27-41.
5. Bramukou U, Freer TJ, Helm S, Kakamkarov H, SardoinCirri J, Solow B. Basic methods for recording malocclusion traits. Dull World Health Organ 1979;57:955-6).
6. Ingervall B. Prcvalancc of denial and occlusal anomalies in Swedish conscripts. Acta Odont Scand 1974:32:83-92,
7. Sal/mann JA. Malocclusion and treatment need in United States vouths 12-17 vcars of age. Am J Orthod 1977:72:579-81',
8. Sputh FL. An assesment of malocclusion in Caucasian eight graders in the Indianapolis public school system. Master's Thesis, Indiana Universlyjy^O-
9. inline T, Hausen H. Occlusal anomalies in Finnish students related to age, sex, absent permanent teeth and orthodontic treatment. Fur .1 Orthod 1983;4:125-3 1.
10. Garner LD, Btitt Mil. Malocclusion in Black Americans and Nyeri Kenyans. Angle Orthod 1985;55:139-46.
I 1. Siriwut pp, .(arabak JR. Malocclusion and facial morphology-Is. there a relationship?-An epidemiologic study. Angle Orthod 1985;55:127-38.
12. Asi DH. Carlos JF, Cons NC. The prevalanee and characteristics of malocclusion among senior high school students in upstate New York. Am J Orthod 1965;51:437-55-
13. Emrich RE, Brodic AG, Blayney JR. Prevalence of Class 1. Class 11 and Class III malocclusion (Angle) in and urban population. An epidemiological study. .1 Dent Res 1965;44:947-53.
14. Horowitz HS. A study of occlusal relations in 10 to 12 yearold Caucasian and Negro Children-Suminury Report. IntDent .1. 1 970:20:593-605.
15. Woon KC, Thoııg YL, Kadir HA. Permanent dentition occlusion in Chinese, Indian and Miilav groups in Malaysia. Atist Orthod J 1989;! 1:45-8.
16. Wood BP, Malocclusion in the modem Alaskan Plskirno. Am J Orthod 1971;57:344-54.
17.
Bi
r Y. Ortodontik tedavi amacı ile başvuran kişilerdeki düzensizliklerin Angle sınıflamasına gore dağılımı, Ege Üniv Diş Ilck Fak Dcrg. 1984;3:9-15.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com