1. Allen, E.F. and Rhoads, R.H.: Effects of high speed periodontal instruments on tooth surface. /. Periodontal., 1963; 34: 352-56.
2. Badersten, A., Nilveus, R. and Egelberg, J.: Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. I. Moderately advanced periodontitis./. Clin. Periodontal, 1981; 8: 57-72.
3. Badersten, A., Nilveus, R. and Egelberg, J.: Effect of nonsurgical periodontal therapy. II. Severely advanced periodontitis. /. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1984; 11: 63-76.
4. Baehni, P., Thiio, B„ Chapuis, B. and Pernet, D.: Effects of ultrasonic and sonic scalers on dental plaque microflora in vitro and in vivo. /. CUn. PeriodontoL, 1992; 19: 455-59.
5. Belting, CM. and Spjut, P.J.: Effects of high-speed periodontal instruments on the root surface during subgingival calculus removal. J.Am. Dent. Assoc., 1964; 69: 579-84.
6. Breİninger, D.R., O'Leary, T.J. and Blumenshine, R.V.H.: Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus. J. PeriodontoL, 1987;58: 9-18.
7. Clark, S.M.: The ultrasonic dental unit: A guide for the clinical application of ultrasonics in dentistry and in dental hygiene. /. PeriodontoL, 1969; 40: 621-29.
8. Clark, S.M., Grupe, H.E. and Mahler, D.B.: The effect of ultrasonic instrumentation on root surfaces., 1968; 39: 135-137.
9. Curie, J. and Curie, P.: Sur I'electricite polaire dans les cris-taux hemiedresa faces enclinees., Compt. Read. Acad. Sc., 1880; 91: 383 (7'den naklen).
10. Dentsply International Inc.: Instructions for using Dentsply / Cavitron Model 2001,1980.
11. D'Silva, I.V., Nayak, R.P., Cherian, K.M. and Mulky, M.J.: An evaluation of the root topography following periodontal instrumentation-A scaning electran microscopic study./. Periodontal., 1979; 50: 283-90.
12. Ewen, S.J.: Ultrasound and periodontics. /. PeriodontoL, 1960; 31: 101-6.
13. Ewen, S.J. and Tascher, P.J.: Clinical use of ultrasonic root scaler./. PeriodontoL, 1958; 29: 45-49.
14. Gankerseer, eJ. and Walmsley, A.D.: Preliminary investigation into the performance of a sonic scaler. /. PeriodontoL, 1987; 58: 780-84.
15. Gellin, R.G., Miller, M.C., Javed, T., Engler, W.O. and Mishkin, D.J.: The effectiveness of the Titan-S sonic scaler versus curettes in the removal of subgingival calculus. A human surgical evaluation./. PeriodontoL, 1986; 57: 672-80.
16. Goldman, H.M.: Curettage by ultrasonic instrument. Oral Surg., OralMed., OralPathoL, 1960; J3:43-53.
17. Goldman, H.M.: Histologic assay of healing following ultrasonic curettage versus hand instrument curettage. Oral Surg., OralMed., OralPathoL, 1961; 14: 925-28.
18. Jotikasthira, N.E., Lie, T. and Leknes, K.N.: Comparative in vitro studies of sonic, ultrasonic and reciprocating scaling instruments./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1992; 19: 560-69.
19. Joule, J.P.: On the effects of magnetism upon the dimensions of iron and steel bars. Mag. and J. Science Series, 1847; 3: 30: 76 (7'den naklen).
20. Kerry, G.J.: Roughness of root surfaces after use of ultrasonic instruments and hand curettes./. PeriodontoL, 1967; 38: 340-46.
21. Khatiblou, F.A. and Ghodssi, A.: Root surface smoothness or roughness in periodontal treatment. A clinical study./. PeriodontoL, 1983; 54: 365-67.
22. Larato, D.C., Ruskin, P.F. and Martin, A.: Effect of an ultrasonic scaler on bacterial counts in air. /. PeriodontoL 1967; 38: 550-54.
23. Leon, L.E. and Vogel, R.I.: A comparison of the effectiveness of hand scaling and ultrasonic debridement İn furcations as evaluated by differential dark-field microscopy./. PeriodontoL 1987;55:86-94.
24. Lie, T. and Leknes, K.N.: Evaluation of the effect on root surfaces of air turbine scalers and ultrasonic instrumentation./. PeriodontoL, 1985; 56: 522-31.
25. Lie, T. and Meyer, K.: Calculus removal and loss of tooth substance in response to different periodontal instruments. A scanning electron microscope study./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1977; 4: 250-62.
26. Loos, B., Kİger, R. and Egelberg, J.: An evaluation of basic periodontal therapy using sonic and ultrasonic scalers./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1987; 14: 29-33.
27. Meyer, K. and Lie, T.: Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of micro-roughness measurements and scaning electron microscopy. /. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1977; 4: 77-91.
28. Moskow, B.S.: The response of the gingival sulcus to instrumentation: a histological investigation./. PeriodontoL, 1962; 33: 282-91.
29. Möller, P., Grevstad, A.O. and Kristoffersen, T.: Ultrasonic scaling of maxillary teeth causing tinnitus and temporary hearing shifts./ Clin. PeriodontoL, 1976; 3: 123-27.
Periodontal
Tedavide Ultrasonik ve Sonik Kazıyıcdar
249
30. Nadler, H.: Removal of crevicular epithelium by ultrasonic curettes. J. Periodontal, 1962; 33: 220-25.
3Î
. Oosterwaal, P.J.M., Matee, M.I., Mikx, F.H.M., van't Hof, M.A. and Renggli, H.H.: The effect of subgingival debridement with hand and ultrasonic instruments on the subgingival microflora./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1987; 14: 528-33.
32. Pameijer, C.H., Stallard, R.E. and Hiep, N.: Surface characteristics of teeth following periodontal instrumentation: A scanning electron microscope study./. PeriodontoL, 1972; 43: 628-33.
33. Patterson, M., Eick, J.D., Eberhard, A.B., Gross, K. and Killoy, W.J.: The effectiveness of two sonic and two ultrasonic scaler tips in furcations. /. PeriodontoL, 1989; 60: 325-29.
34. Ritz, L., Hefti, A.F. and Rateitschak, K.H.: An in vitro investigation on the loss of root substance in scaling with various instruments./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1991; 18: 643-47.
35. Rosenberg, R.M. and Ash, M.M.: The effect of root roughness on plaque accumulation and gingival inflamation./. PeriodontoL 1974; 45:146-50.
36. Sanderson, A.D.: Gingival curettage by hand and ultrasonic instruments: Ahistologic comparison./.PeriodontoL, 1966; 40:279-90.
37. Schaffer, E.M., Stende, G. and King, D.: Healing of periodontal pocket tissues following ultrasonic scaling and hand planing./. PeriodontoL, 1964; 35: 140-48.
38. Smart, GJ., Wilson, M., Davies, E.H. and kieser, J.B.: The assesment of ultrasonic root surface debridement by determination of residual endotoxin levels. /. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1990; 17: 174-78.
39. Stende, G.W. and Schaffer, E.M.: A comparison of ultrasonic and hand scaling./. PeriodontoL, 1961; 32: 312-14.
40. Stewart, J.L., Drisko, R.R. and Herİach, A.D.: Comparison of ultrasonic and hand instruments for the removal of calculus. J.Am. Dent., Assoc., 1967; 75: 153-57.
41. Suppipat, N.: Ultrasonics in periodontics./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1974; J: 206-13.
42. Sweeney, W.T.: Charactiristics of ultrasonic vibrations. J. Am. Dent. Assoc., 1957;55:819-22.
43. Thornton, S. and Garnick, J.: Comparison of ultrasonic to hand instruments in the removal of subgingival plaque./. PeriodontoL, 1982; 53: 35-7.
44. Torfason, T.f Kiger, R., Selvig, K.A. and Egelberg, J.: Clinical improvement of gingival conditions following ultrasonic versus hand instruments of periodontal pockets./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1979; 6: 165-76.
45. Walmsley, A.D., Laird, W.R.E. and Williams, A.R.: Dental plaque removal by cavitational activity during ultrasonic scaling./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1988; 15: 539-43.
46. Walmsley, A.D., Walsh, T.F., Laird, W.R.E. and Williams, A.R.: Effects of cavitational activity on the root surface of during ultrasonic scaling./. Clin. PeriodontoL, 1990; 17: 306¬12.
47. Wilkinson, R.F. and Maybury, J.E.: Scanning electron mikroscopy of the root surface following instrumentation. /. PeriodontoL, 1973; 44: 559-63.
48. Youle, J.D.:
Teme
l bilimler ansiklopedisi. Milliyet Yayınlan, İstanbul, 1989.
49. Zinner, D.D.: Ultrasonic studies in dentistry: A preliminary report. Proc. of Fourth Annual Conference on Ultrasonic Therapy. Library of Congress 55:12257:6:1955 (39'dan naklen).
Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com