You are here

The Differences of Career Self-efficacy in the Selection of Careers among Malay Students at International Islamic University Malaysia

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Abstract (2. Language): 
This study was conducted to examine the link between career self-efficacy and career selections of university students. The study was also aimed to find out the differences of career self-efficacy in terms of gender and socio-economic status. The study was restricted to Malay students, and Malay is one of the main races in Malaysia. Participants selected for this study were undergraduate Malay students from different faculties at International Islamic University, Malaysia. The number of samples selected was 200, consisting of 100 males and 100 females. The instrument used in the study was designed by Bentz and Hackett (1981) and was adapted by the researcher to suit the Malaysian context. Data was analyzed using t-test and one-way variance. The result indicates significant differences in career self-efficacy in successfully completing the educational requirements and performing job duties of traditional and nontraditional careers with regard to gender. The result of this study also indicates that female students show higher career-self-efficacy for both traditional and non-traditional careers, compared to male students. The study also shows that students from high economic status reported higher career self-efficacy compared to students from medium and low socio economicstatus.
17
30

REFERENCES

References: 

Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy in changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.
Bentz, N.E. (2000). Self-efficacy as a basis for career assessment. Journal of Career Assessment
8(3), 205-219.
Bentz, N.E.& Hackett,G. (1998). Manual for the Occupational Self-efficacy Scale. Ohio State
University & Arizona State University.
Bonett, D.A. (1994). Marital status and sex: Impact on career self-efficacy. Journal of
Counselling and Development. 73, 187-194.
Gati, I., Givon, M.& Osipow, S.H. (1995). Gender differences in career decision making: The
content and structure of preferences. Journal of Counselling Psychology. 42(2), 204-216.
George, D. & Mallery, P. (2001) SPSS for Windows Step by Srep: A Simple Guide and References
10.0 Update. 3rd Edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hackett, G. (1995) Self-efficacy in career choice and development. in Bandura, Self-efficacy in
changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
McCracken, R.S. & Weitzman. L.M. (1997). Relationship of personal agency, problem solving
appraisal, and traditionality of career choice to women’s attitudes toward multiple role
planning. Journal of Counselling Psychology. 2, 149-159.
O’Brien, V, Martinez-Pons, M & Kopala, M. (1999). Mathematics self-efficacy, ethnic identity,
gender, and career interests related to mathematics and science. The Journal of
Educational Research. 92(4), 231-238.
Rainey, L.M. & Borders, L.D. (1997). Influential factors in career orientation and career
aspiration of early adolescent girls. Journal of Counselling Psychology. 44(2), 160-172.
Scheye, P.A. & Gilroy, F.D. (1994) College women’s career self-efficacy and educational
environments. The Career Development Quarterly(42), 244-251.
Service Circular 2002.
Wiersma, W. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development in Bandura, Self-efficacy in
changing societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com