You are here

ÖĞE GÖSTERİM TEORİSİ’NİN BİR UYGULAMASI: FONKSİYON KAVRAMININ ÖĞRETİMİ

AN APPLICATION OF THE COMPONENT DISPLAY THEORY: THE FUNCTION CONCEPT TEACHING

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Author NameUniversity of AuthorFaculty of Author
Abstract (2. Language): 
The Component Display Theory (CDT) is a teaching method which contains various teaching components. This property of CDT enable us to use different teaching strategies and technics in teaching of any concept or, particularly, of mathematical concepts. This case gives the student a facility to learning math concepts more easily and it also help teachers to make more guidance to the students at every levels. In this study it has given an application of teaching the concept of functions by means of CDT, which is one of the most challenging and important concept in mathematics and in comprehending of which students always have difficulties.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Öğe Gösterim Teorisi (ÖGT), çeşitli öğretim bileşenlerini içeren bir öğretim teorisidir. ÖGT’nin bu özelliği, herhangi bir kavramın veya özelde bir matematiksel kavramın öğretiminde farklı öğretim stratejilerinin ve tekniklerinin birlikte kullanılmasına imkan verir. Bu durumda, öğrencilerin matematiksel kavramları daha kolay öğrenmelerine, öğretmenlerin de her düzeydeki öğrenciye daha fazla rehberlik yapabilmelerine olanak sağlar. Bu çalışmada, matematik müfredatının en önemli kavramlarından birisi olan ve öğrenciler tarafından anlaşılmasında bazı sıkıntıların olduğu görülen fonksiyon kavramının öğretiminin, ÖGT’ne göre nasıl yapılabileceğine yönelik bir uygulama örneği verilmiştir.
287-297

REFERENCES

References: 

Beckmann, C., Thompson, D. ve Senk, S.
(1999). Assessing Students'
Understanding of Functions in a
Graphing Calculator Environment.
School Science and Mathematics.
December, 99, 8; ERIC, s. 451
Chao, C. ve başk. (1983). Effects of Four
Instructional Sequences on
Application and Transfer, IDD&E
Working Paper, no.12, ED289461.
Eric Document Repricodument.
Cooney, T. (1999). Developing a Topic
across the Curriculum: Functions.
(Ed., Peake, L.) Mathematics,
Pedagogy and Secondary Teacher
Education. 361 Hannover Street,
USA.
Dede,Y. (2003). Öğe Gösterim Teorisi’nin
İlköğretim Matematik Öğretimindeki
Etkililiği. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri
Dergisi. 1(3), s. 355-360.
Fidan, N. (1996). Eğitim Psikolojisi, Okulda
Öğrenme ve Öğretme. Alkım Yay.
İstanbul.
Hauge, S. (1993). Functions and Relations:
Some Applications from Database
Management for the Teaching of
Classroom Mathematics. ED 365 519.
GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ KIRŞEHİR EĞİTİM FAKÜLTESİ, Cilt 5, Sayı 2, (2004) 297
Gaea, L., Orıt, Z. Ve Kay. S. (1990).
Functions, Graphs, and Graphing:
Tasks, Learning, and Teaching.
Review of Educational Research.
Spring, vol 60, no 1,s.1-64.
Iaderosa, R. A. ve Malara, N. (1999). An
Aspect of a Didactical Path for
Approaching the Concept of
Function: The Qualitative
Interpretation of a Graph.
http://math.unipa.it/ ~grim/AMalara,
(2003, August 22 ).
Keller, B. ve Reigeluth, C. (1982).
Comparison of Three Instructional
Presentation Formats. IDD&E
Working Paper, No. 6, ED28851.
Eric Document Repricodument.
Marovitz, M. ve Buckley, J. (1987).
Integrating ARCS Motivational Theory
into the Component Display Theory of
Instructional Design. ED292872. Eric
Document Repricodument.
MEB. (1992). Ortaöğretim Matematik Dersi
Programları. Milli Eğitim Basımevi,
İstanbul.
Merrill, D. (1983). Component Display
Theory. (Ed. Reigeluth C.).
Instructional Design Theories and
Models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
Associates.
.................... (1987a). A Lesson Based On
The Component Display Theory.
Instructional Theories In Action:
Lessons Illustrating Selected Theories
and Models. (Ed. Reigeluth, C.).
Hillsdale, New Jersey.
..................... (1987b). The New Component
Design Theory: Instructional Design
for Courseware Authoring.
Instructional Science 16, 19 -34.
.................... (1988). Applying Component
Display Theory to the Design of
Courseware (Ed. Jonassen, D).
Instructional Designs For Microcomputer
Courseware. Hillsdale, New Jersey, 61-95.
................... (1994). The Descriptive Component
Display Theory. Instructional Design
Theory. (Ed. Twitchelll, D.). Educational
Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs,
New Jersey 07632.
.................. (2001). Components of
Instruction toward a Theoretical Tool
for Instructional Design. Instructional
Science 29: 291–310.
Twitchell, D. (1990a). Robert M. Gagne and
M. David Merrill: In Conversation.
No. 5: A Comparison of Robert M.
Gagne's Events of Instruction and M.
David Merrill's Component Display
Theory. Educational Technology. 30
(11), 35-39.
.................(1990b). A Simplified Approach
to the Application of Component
Display Theory. Educational
Technology. April, 30 (4), 11-18.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com