You are here

RESTORATİF DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE KOMPOZİT İNLEY-ONLEY TEKNİKLERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

EVALUATION OF COMPOSITE IN LEY-ONLAY TECHNIQUES IN RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY

Journal Name:

Publication Year:

Keywords (Original Language):

Abstract (2. Language): 
Indirect restoration;, can. be pr ad an iJtsrnativc to direct restorations in situations where there is an excessive hard tissue loss. The&e are called inlay-onlay restorations. The inlay-onlay restorations can be produced from metal, porcelain or composite. These three, materials have various advantages and disadvantages compared to each other. The true indication should • be decided by considering the patient's socio-economical status. In this review, the composite inlay-onlay restorations will be discussed.
Abstract (Original Language): 
Diş sert doku kayıplarının fazla olduğu durumlarda, indırekt restorasyonlar direkt restorasyonlara alternatif olarak tercih edilebilir. Bunlara inley-onley restorasyonlar denir. İnley-onley restorasyonlar melal, porselen veya kompozkten yapılabilir. Bu üç materyal birbirleri ile kıyaslandığında, çeşitli avantaj ve dezavantajları vardır. Hasıanm s osyo-ekonomik durumu da güz önüne alınarak doğru endikasyon konulmalıdır. Bu derlemede, klinik açıdan kompozit inley-onley restorasyonlar bahsedilecektir.

REFERENCES

References: 

1. Goldstein RE- Esthetics in dentistry. BC Decker Inc. Canada. 1998.
2.
Bayırl
ı G. Endodontik Tedavi II. istanbul Üniversitesi Basımevi ve Film Merkezi. Bölüm 10, istanbul 1999.
3. Andrcasen FM, Andrea&en JO. Examination and
^mım,«io ,-.f rfnni-ıl mİtinr-c İn- Andı-Msen .[O. Andreasen
UICglLl/LIK ^ ......... ...j.... , -
FM,
Textboo
k and color atlas of traumatic injuries of the teeth, Munskgaard, Mosby, Copenhagen, St- Louis, 1994: 15] ISO.
4. Roulet JF, Spreafico R. Esthetic posterior indirect restorations. In: Roulet JF, Wilson NHF, Huzzi M. Advances in Operative Dentitsry. Contemporary Clinical Practice Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. Illinois. 2001: 165-190.
5.
Nayı
r H. Dişhekimliği maddeler bilgisi. Yedinci Baskı. İstanbul Üniversitesi Basımevi ve Film Merkezi. İstanbul 1999:145.
6. Nathanson [>. Principles of porcelain use as an inlay/onlay material. In: Garber DA, Goldstein RE. Porcelain & Composite Inlay &. Onlays. Esthetic Posterior Restorations. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. Chicago. 1994:37¬7. Shillingburg HT- Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. Third edition. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. Chicago. 1997.
8. Yavuzyilmaz H- Metal
destekl
i estetik Kuronlar. Ga^i üniversitesi iletişim Fakültesi Basımevi. Ankara 1990:13.
9. Manhart J, Scheibcnbogen-Fuchsbrımner A, Chen HY, Hickei R. A 2-year clinical study of composite and ceramic mlays. Clin Oral Invest 2000; 4:192-198.
10.
Çalıkkocaoğl
u $. Diş Hekimliğinde Maddeler Bilgisi. Mor Ajans İstanbul 2000. Bölüm 7. sayfa 171.
11.
Spreafic
o RC. Gagliani M. Composite Resin Restorations on Posterior Teeth. Tn: Roulet JF, Degrangc M. Adhesion. The sileni revaluation in Dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co. Inc. Berlin. 2000¬12. Garber DA. Goldstein RE. Cast-Ceramic
Systems and Other Alternatives. In: Porcelain & Composite Inlay & Onlays. Esthetic Posterior Restorations. Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. Chicago. 1994: 104.
13. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fcilzer A. Materials and juiing cements lor iimucvi i^siviaiiuua. m. nuui« .>• , Wilson NHF, Fuzzi M, ed: Advances in Operative Dentistry, Contemporary Clinical Practice, Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc. 2001: 95-107.
14. Rceh ES., Mcsser HH, Douglas WH. Redaction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative prosedüre. J Endod 1989; 15: 512-516.
15. Sorensen JA., Martinoff .IT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontics I ly treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 51:
780-784.
65
Atatürk Üniv.Dij Hek.Fak.Derg. CİJt:14,Sayı2, Sayfa:59-66.2004
ERSOY,ÖZEL
](•>. Hernandez R, Büder S, Dostun D, Trope M. Resistance to İmciline of endodontic ally treated premolars restored with new generation dentine bonding systems. Int Endod J 1994,27: 281-284.
17. Lopez l.MP, l^itao JGM, Douglas WH, Effect of a new resin inlay/onlay restorative material on cuspal reinforcement. Quintessence Int 1991; 22: 641-645,
18. Haller B, Thull R, Klaibcr B, Schmitz A.
Hockerstabilisierung durch Adhösiv inlays in MOD Kavitötcıı. Dtsclı Zahnnörztl Z. 1990; 45: 660-663.
19. Burke FJT, Wilson NHF, Watts DO. The effect of cuspal ctîverage on the fracture resistance ül" teeth restored with indirect composite resin restorations. Quintessence Int 1993,24:875-880.
27. Smith CT., Schuman N. Restoration of endodonticdly treated teeth: a guide for the restorative dentist. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 457-462.
28. Schwartz RS., Summitt JB., Robbins JW. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry. Quintessence Publishing Co, Illinois, 1996:234.
29. Pcutzfcld A, Asmusscn E. A comparison of accuracy in seating and gap formation for three inlay/onlay ledrniqiltai.Oper Dent 1990, 15:129-35¬30. Cassin AM, Pearson GJ. Mrcroleakage studies
comparing a one visit indirect composite inlay system and a direct composite restorative technique. .T Oral Rehabil 1992, 19:265-270.

Thank you for copying data from http://www.arastirmax.com